TGB vs SLSR vs LCU Stock Comparison

Trekor Metals, Solaris Resources and Lion Copper Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TGB Trekor Metals Ltd
$7.87 -11.4% 1M +74.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.84B
P/E
176.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$916.35M
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
6 wins
LCU Lion Copper Corp.
$4.40 -11.5% 1M +63.0% 1Y
Market cap
$70.27M
P/E
263.5x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Trekor Metals leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Trekor Metals 6, Solaris Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTGBSLSRLCULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.84B $1.15B $70.27M TGB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 176.6x -20.9x 263.5x TGB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +72.6% -27.3% — TGB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 23.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +74.5% +7.3% +63.0% TGB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.1%/yr -9.9%/yr +3.1%/yr TGB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 71.2% 58.1% 153.3% SLSR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 38/100 46/100 TGB

Percentile Scorecard

TGBSLSRLCU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTGBSLSRLCU
Valuation 69 #51 of 163 32 #111 of 163 65 #58 of 163
Growth 93 #12 of 148 49 #76 of 148 80 #30 of 148
Profitability 78 #28 of 123 – 16 #104 of 123
Financial Health 22 #128 of 164 34 #109 of 164 42 #96 of 164
Shareholder Returns 64 #40 of 108 – 25 #81 of 108
Overall 65 38 46
  • TGB ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SLSR ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LCU ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTGBSLSRLCUSPY
1 month -11.4%-1.7%-11.5% +0.7%
3 months +11.6%-10.9%-14.2% +3.7%
6 months +9.9%-32.4%-34.8% +7.1%
Year to date +39.0%-13.6%+16.4% +12.8%
1 year +74.5%+7.3%+63.0% +11.9%
3 years +622.0%+73.1%+225.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +93.4%+20.1%+48.3% +22.8%
5 years +273.0%-40.4%+16.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year +30.1%-9.9%+3.1% +10.9%
10 years +1,648.9%—+225.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +33.1%—+12.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTGBSLSRLCUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 71.2%58.1%153.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.3%60.0%185.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.972.18-0.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.050.130.41 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.9%-85.6%-73.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.7%-38.1%-49.3% -1.2%
52-week high $9.68$11.13$8.68 $779.14
52-week low $4.19$6.22$2.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTGBSLSRLCU
P/E now vs peer median 176.6xmedian 13.2x -20.9xmedian 13.2x 263.5xmedian 13.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.1x -184.0xmedian 3.1x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 7.2x -31.5xmedian 7.2x —median 7.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 15.2x -14.6xmedian 15.2x 5.4xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.2x -22.9xmedian 2.2x 3.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.66median 0.30 —median 0.30 5.21median 0.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTGBSLSRLCU
Revenue $916.35M -$6.25M –
Gross profit $387.04M – –
Operating income $372.24M -$49.57M -$14.76M
Net income $15.68M -$30.06M -$2.10M
Free cash flow $502.57M -$78.72M $12.93M
R&D – $16.18M –
EPS (diluted) $0.04 $-0.33 $0.02
Cash & equivalents $185.76M $54.01M –
Total debt $3.05B – $11.38M
Shares (diluted) 323.50M 165.13M 430.24M
Enterprise value $2.25B $1.03B $70.27M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTGBSLSRLCU
P/E 176.6x -20.9x 263.5x
P/FCF 5.7x -14.6x 5.4x
P/Operating cash flow 6.8x – 5.4x
P/S 3.1x -184.0x –
P/B 3.3x -22.9x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 3.3x -22.9x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x -31.5x –
EV/EBIT 9.3x -22.1x -4.9x
EV/Revenue 3.8x -175.3x –
EV/FCF 6.9x -13.9x 5.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.3x – 5.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.66 – 5.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTGBSLSRLCU
Revenue growth (1Y) 72.6% -27.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 32.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 154.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 49.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 167.9% 40.3% -273.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 53.4% – -60.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 155.8% 55.4% 59.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.5% – 19.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 159.7% 40.2% 290.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.3% – 50.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 88.5% – 327.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 78.7% – 197.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 73.6% 2.2% 326.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.2% – 197.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTGBSLSRLCU
Gross margin 42.2% – –
EBITDA margin 54.2% – –
Operating margin 40.6% – –
Pretax margin 43.3% – –
Net margin 1.6% – –
FCF margin 54.8% – –
Operating cash flow margin 45.3% – –
Return on equity 5.6% – -66.5%
Return on assets 1.8% 38.8% -29.7%
Return on invested capital 23.0% – –
Return on capital employed 15.8% -70.0% -55.8%
Asset turnover 0.3x -0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 26.5x – -6.2x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% -78.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTGBSLSRLCU
Debt / assets 30.3% – 6.0%
Debt / equity 0.9x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x – –
Debt / FCF 1.6x – 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 68.0% 148.9% 53.0%
Equity / assets 32.0% -48.9% 47.0%
Interest coverage 8.3x -10.1x –
Current ratio – 8.4x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 8.2x –
Cash ratio 0.7x 8.2x –
Altman Z-score – -1.11 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTGBSLSRLCU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.4% – -5.9%
Shareholder yield -0.4% – -5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTGBSLSRLCU
Forward P/E 20.2xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.39FY2026 $-0.18FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +680.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +112.8% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $936.91MFY2026 $0.00FY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +91.2%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +27.8% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTGBSLSRLCU
Held by institutions 54.7% – –
Institutions holding 178 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.1% – –
Institutions buying 176 – –
Institutions selling 2 – –
Buyers to sellers 88.00 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TGBSLSRLCU
TGB 1.00 0.77 -0.04
SLSR 0.77 1.00 -0.09
LCU -0.04 -0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TGB, SLSR and LCU?

Trekor Metals (TGB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Trekor Metals (TGB) $2.84B, Solaris Resources (SLSR) $1.15B, Lion Copper (LCU) $70.27M.

Which stock is cheaper, TGB, SLSR and LCU?

Trekor Metals (TGB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Trekor Metals (TGB) 176.6x, Solaris Resources (SLSR) -20.9x, Lion Copper (LCU) 263.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Trekor Metals (TGB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Trekor Metals (TGB) +72.6%, Solaris Resources (SLSR) -27.3%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Trekor Metals (TGB) returned the most: Trekor Metals (TGB) +74.5%, Solaris Resources (SLSR) +7.3%, Lion Copper (LCU) +63.0%. Over five years, Trekor Metals (TGB) compounded fastest (Trekor Metals (TGB) +30.1%/yr, Solaris Resources (SLSR) -9.9%/yr, Lion Copper (LCU) +3.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Solaris Resources (SLSR) has been the steadiest (Trekor Metals (TGB) 71.2%, Solaris Resources (SLSR) 58.1%, Lion Copper (LCU) 153.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TGB, SLSR and LCU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trekor Metals (TGB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.