TGB vs CRS vs ALM Stock Comparison

Trekor Metals, Carpenter Technology and Almonty Industries Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TMC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TGB Trekor Metals Ltd
$7.58 -14.6% 1M +80.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.27B
P/E
157.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$916.35M
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
3 wins
ALM Almonty Industries Inc.
$8.79 -35.0% 1M +41.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.65B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$62.16M
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Carpenter Technology leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Carpenter Technology 4, Almonty Industries 4, Trekor Metals 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTGBCRSALMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.27B $13.93B $1.65B CRS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 157.4x 24.4x 29.0x CRS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.4x 20.8x 14.6x ALM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +72.6% +10.2% +208.0% ALM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 17.9% 91.6% ALM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 23.0% 20.8% — TGB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.6x -0.7x ALM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +80.9% -4.6% +41.8% TGB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.3%/yr +55.0%/yr +40.3%/yr CRS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 71.3% 49.4% 91.4% CRS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 61/100 63/100 TGB

Percentile Scorecard

TGBCRSALM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTGBCRSALM
Valuation 73 #47 of 168 53 #80 of 168 35 #109 of 168
Growth 93 #12 of 152 71 #45 of 152 93 #11 of 152
Profitability 78 #28 of 123 75 #32 of 123 80 #25 of 123
Financial Health 20 #132 of 165 38 #103 of 165 45 #92 of 165
Shareholder Returns 62 #45 of 117 71 #35 of 117 –
Overall 65 61 63
  • TGB ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • CRS ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • ALM ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTGBCRSALMSPY
1 month -14.6%-25.5%-35.0% -1.0%
3 months -7.3%-48.8%-34.0% -0.4%
6 months +0.8%-36.2%-58.8% +4.5%
Year to date +33.9%-7.1%-0.2% +12.4%
1 year +80.9%-4.6%+41.8% +13.6%
3 years +483.1%+338.6%+865.9% +76.4%
3 years, per year +80.1%+63.7%+113.1% +20.8%
5 years +247.7%+792.3%+442.6% +63.7%
5 years, per year +28.3%+55.0%+40.3% +10.4%
10 years +1,584.4%+820.7%+2,275.7% +267.7%
10 years, per year +32.6%+24.9%+37.3% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureTGBCRSALMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 71.3%49.4%91.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.1%53.1%88.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.951.603.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.14-0.090.46 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.9%-54.8%-62.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.7%-52.8%-62.5% -1.6%
52-week high $9.68$619.28$23.42 $779.14
52-week low $4.19$280.03$5.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTGBCRSALM
P/E now vs peer median 170.0xmedian 13.4x 25.5xmedian 13.4x 32.1xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 3.0x 4.5xmedian 3.0x 37.2xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 7.7x 16.8xmedian 7.7x 5.1xmedian 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 13.3x 42.5xmedian 13.3x —median 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 2.3x 6.6xmedian 2.3x 5.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 3.52median 0.19 0.34median 0.19 —median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTGBCRSALM
Revenue $916.35M $3.19B $62.16M
Gross profit $387.04M $995.30M $29.80M
Operating income $372.24M $745.00M $30.20M
Net income $15.68M $569.80M -$73.22B
Free cash flow $502.57M $340.80M –
EPS (diluted) $0.04 $11.40 $0.27
Cash & equivalents $185.76M $159.50M $863.71M
Total debt $809.11M $691.00M $572.28M
Shares (diluted) 323.50M 50.00M 208.03M
Enterprise value $1.68B $12.85B $492.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTGBCRSALM
P/E 170.0x 25.5x 32.1x
P/FCF 5.4x 42.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 6.6x 23.4x –
P/S 3.0x 4.5x 37.2x
P/B 3.2x 6.6x 5.9x
P/Tangible book 3.2x 6.6x 5.9x
EV/EBITDA 6.8x 16.8x 5.1x
EV/EBIT 9.0x 20.1x 66.8x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 4.7x 32.5x
EV/FCF 6.7x 44.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 8.1x 24.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.52 0.34 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTGBCRSALM
Revenue growth (1Y) 72.6% 10.2% 208.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 32.8% -5.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 154.8% 23.1% 7,264%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 49.8% 34.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 167.9% 32.7% 9,134%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 53.4% 56.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 155.8% 37.7% -161.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.5% 74.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 159.7% 38.8% 162.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.3% 74.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 88.5% 40.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 78.7% 83.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 73.6% 26.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.2% 232.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTGBCRSALM
Gross margin 42.2% 31.2% 47.9%
EBITDA margin 54.2% 28.0% 635.6%
Operating margin 40.6% 23.4% 48.6%
Pretax margin 43.3% 22.1% 234.8%
Net margin 1.6% 17.9% 91.6%
FCF margin 54.8% 10.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 45.3% 19.4% –
Return on equity 5.6% 25.8% –
Return on assets 1.8% 15.0% –
Return on invested capital 23.0% 20.8% –
Return on capital employed 15.8% 22.4% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 26.5x 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 0.9% 7,418%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTGBCRSALM
Debt / assets 30.3% 18.5% 47.7%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.3x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 0.6x -0.7x
Debt / FCF 1.6x 2.0x –
Liabilities / assets 68.0% 41.7% 67.6%
Equity / assets 32.0% 58.3% 32.4%
Interest coverage 8.3x – 4.8x
Current ratio – 3.9x 9.6x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.9x 9.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.3x 9.3x
Altman Z-score – 8.39 2.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTGBCRSALM
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield -0.4% 1.7% –
Shareholder yield -0.4% 2.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTGBCRSALM
Forward P/E 19.4xFY2026 20.8xFY2027 14.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.39FY2026 $14.05FY2027 $0.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +680.0%FY2026 +30.6%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +112.8% +8.6% +115.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $936.91MFY2026 $3.56BFY2027 $228.30MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +91.2%FY2026 +14.0%FY2027 +864.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.8% -0.4% +190.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTGBCRSALM
Held by institutions 0.2% 93.3% 59.4%
Institutions holding 4 878 181
Change in shares held, QoQ -99.7% -0.9% +27.9%
Institutions buying 2 549 140
Institutions selling 2 250 30
Buyers to sellers 1.00 2.20 4.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TGBCRSALM
TGB 1.00 0.35 0.55
CRS 0.35 1.00 0.33
ALM 0.55 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TGB, CRS and ALM?

Carpenter Technology (CRS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Trekor Metals (TGB) $2.27B, Carpenter Technology (CRS) $13.93B, Almonty Industries (ALM) $1.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, TGB, CRS and ALM?

Carpenter Technology (CRS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Trekor Metals (TGB) 157.4x, Carpenter Technology (CRS) 24.4x, Almonty Industries (ALM) 29.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Almonty Industries (ALM) is cheapest (Trekor Metals (TGB) 19.4x, Carpenter Technology (CRS) 20.8x, Almonty Industries (ALM) 14.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Almonty Industries (ALM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Trekor Metals (TGB) +72.6%, Carpenter Technology (CRS) +10.2%, Almonty Industries (ALM) +208.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Almonty Industries (ALM) has the highest net margin (Trekor Metals (TGB) 1.6%, Carpenter Technology (CRS) 17.9%, Almonty Industries (ALM) 91.6%). On return on invested capital, Trekor Metals (TGB) leads (Trekor Metals (TGB) 23.0%, Carpenter Technology (CRS) 20.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Trekor Metals (TGB) returned the most: Trekor Metals (TGB) +80.9%, Carpenter Technology (CRS) -4.6%, Almonty Industries (ALM) +41.8%. Over five years, Carpenter Technology (CRS) compounded fastest (Trekor Metals (TGB) +28.3%/yr, Carpenter Technology (CRS) +55.0%/yr, Almonty Industries (ALM) +40.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Carpenter Technology (CRS) has been the steadiest (Trekor Metals (TGB) 71.3%, Carpenter Technology (CRS) 49.4%, Almonty Industries (ALM) 91.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TGB, CRS and ALM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Carpenter Technology (CRS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.