TEO vs VZ Stock Comparison

Telecom Argentina and Verizon Communications Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TEO Telecom Argentina Sa
$11.93 -8.3% 1M +50.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.99B
P/E
34.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.34B
Div. yield
–
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
3 wins
VZ Verizon Communications Inc
$43.11 -8.5% 1M +11.1% 1Y
Market cap
$183.12B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
3 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Verizon Communications leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Verizon Communications 3, Telecom Argentina 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTEOVZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.99B $183.12B VZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.3x 11.9x VZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.7x 8.2x TEO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.7% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +50.6% +11.1% TEO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.1%/yr -3.9%/yr TEO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.5% 28.0% VZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

TEOVZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTEOVZ
Valuation 58 #21 of 49 56 #22 of 49
Growth – –
Profitability 80 #10 of 45 –
Financial Health 56 #22 of 49 –
Shareholder Returns 33 #25 of 37 72 #11 of 37
Overall 57 –
  • TEO ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • VZ ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTEOVZSPY
1 month -8.3%-8.5% -0.8%
3 months -14.7%-9.0% +3.5%
6 months +6.3%-8.5% +7.0%
Year to date +2.8%+5.8% +12.2%
1 year +50.6%+11.1% +13.0%
3 years +114.6%+28.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +29.0%+8.8% +23.1%
5 years +129.4%-18.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +18.1%-3.9% +11.0%
10 years —-9.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-1.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTEOVZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.5%28.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.6%28.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.25-0.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.040.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.0%-44.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.3%-16.1% -1.8%
52-week high $15.98$51.38 $779.14
52-week low $10.65$38.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTEOVZ
P/E now vs peer median 35.3xmedian 11.8x 11.9xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.1x 1.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 6.8x —median 6.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 5.7x 8.9xmedian 5.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.3x 1.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.24 —median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTEOVZ
Revenue $5.34B –
Operating income $516.36M –
Net income $148.22M –
Free cash flow $8.97B –
Cash & equivalents $323.15M $4.50B
Total debt $15.71B –
Shares (diluted) – 4.17B
Enterprise value $2.80B $183.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTEOVZ
P/E 35.3x 11.9x
P/FCF 0.6x 8.9x
P/Operating cash flow 0.5x –
P/S 1.0x 1.4x
P/B 1.1x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 1.7x -3.3x
EV/EBITDA 1.0x –
EV/EBIT 16.1x –
EV/Revenue 1.6x –
EV/FCF 0.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 0.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTEOVZ
Revenue growth (1Y) – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – –
EPS growth (1Y) – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTEOVZ
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin 163.0% –
Operating margin 9.7% –
Pretax margin 3.9% –
Net margin 2.7% –
FCF margin 167.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 176.4% –
Return on equity 3.3% –
Return on assets 1.4% –
Return on invested capital 6.0% –
Return on capital employed 5.8% –
Asset turnover 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 63.6x –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTEOVZ
Debt / assets 32.7% –
Debt / equity 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x –
Debt / FCF 0.4x –
Liabilities / assets 58.0% –
Equity / assets 42.0% 25.8%
Interest coverage 0.4x –
Current ratio 0.5x 0.6x
Quick ratio 0.5x –
Cash ratio 0.2x –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTEOVZ
Dividend yield 2.2% 6.5%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 2.2% 6.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTEOVZ
Forward P/E 6.7xFY2026 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.77FY2026 $5.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +11.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -42.9% +7.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.70BFY2026 $145.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.0%FY2026 +5.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.9% +0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTEOVZ
Held by institutions 3.4% 68.7%
Institutions holding 68 3,131
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +3.1%
Institutions buying 46 1,594
Institutions selling 14 1,246
Buyers to sellers 3.29 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TEOVZ
TEO 1.00 0.00
VZ 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TEO and VZ?

Verizon Communications (VZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Telecom Argentina (TEO) $4.99B, Verizon Communications (VZ) $183.12B.

Which stock is cheaper, TEO and VZ?

Verizon Communications (VZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Telecom Argentina (TEO) 34.3x, Verizon Communications (VZ) 11.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Telecom Argentina (TEO) is cheapest (Telecom Argentina (TEO) 6.7x, Verizon Communications (VZ) 8.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Telecom Argentina (TEO) returned the most: Telecom Argentina (TEO) +50.6%, Verizon Communications (VZ) +11.1%. Over five years, Telecom Argentina (TEO) compounded fastest (Telecom Argentina (TEO) +18.1%/yr, Verizon Communications (VZ) -3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Verizon Communications (VZ) has been the steadiest (Telecom Argentina (TEO) 48.5%, Verizon Communications (VZ) 28.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do TEO and VZ move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of -0.00, a negative relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, TEO and VZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Verizon Communications (VZ) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.