TDY vs NOC vs CW Stock Comparison

Teledyne Technologies, Northrop Grumman and Curtiss Wright Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CW Curtiss Wright Corp
$477.08 -11.6% 1M -16.8% 1Y
Market cap
$17.62B
P/E
32.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.65B
Div. yield
0.21%
Defense Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Northrop Grumman leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Northrop Grumman 4, Curtiss Wright 4, Teledyne Technologies 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTDYNOCCWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $30.28B $78.32B $17.62B NOC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.5x 17.3x 32.6x NOC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.1x 17.9x 33.2x NOC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.6% +6.5% +10.5% CW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.8% 10.4% 14.8% TDY
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.1% 12.2% 14.7% CW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.9x 1.7x 0.6x CW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.73% 0.21% NOC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.0% -7.5% -16.8% TDY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.0%/yr +9.0%/yr +29.9%/yr CW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 28.7% 35.9% TDY
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 58/100 68/100 TDY

Percentile Scorecard

TDYNOCCW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTDYNOCCW
Valuation 66 #35 of 100 78 #23 of 100 52 #49 of 100
Growth 39 #60 of 97 38 #61 of 97 60 #39 of 97
Profitability 83 #17 of 96 78 #22 of 96 95 #6 of 96
Financial Health 73 #29 of 105 40 #63 of 105 66 #36 of 105
Shareholder Returns 91 #7 of 65 58 #28 of 65 67 #22 of 65
Overall 70 58 68
  • TDY ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NOC ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • CW ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTDYNOCCWSPY
1 month +6.7%+8.0%-11.6% -0.2%
3 months +0.8%+0.4%-34.5% +3.9%
6 months +2.1%-4.6%-32.4% +8.2%
Year to date +28.3%-3.3%-13.5% +12.9%
1 year +24.0%-7.5%-16.8% +12.3%
3 years +76.7%+16.5%+143.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.9%+5.2%+34.6% +23.3%
5 years +46.7%+53.7%+269.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.0%+9.0%+29.9% +10.9%
10 years +518.4%+144.6%+438.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +20.0%+9.4%+18.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTDYNOCCWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%28.7%35.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.0%28.4%38.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.12-0.011.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.93-0.26-0.47 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.2%-38.4%-41.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.2%-28.2%-39.8% -1.2%
52-week high $691.24$768.02$792.61 $779.14
52-week low $484.47$473.40$464.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTDYNOCCW
P/E now vs peer median 29.5xmedian 26.5x 17.3xmedian 26.5x 32.6xmedian 26.5x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 3.0x 1.8xmedian 3.0x 4.8xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.3xmedian 14.6x 14.5xmedian 14.6x 22.5xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.4xmedian 26.4x 20.5xmedian 26.4x 28.2xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.5x 4.2xmedian 2.5x 6.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median -49.75median 0.90 17.01median 0.90 1.58median 0.90

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTDYNOCCW
Revenue $6.52B $43.59B $3.65B
Gross profit $2.84B $8.73B $1.38B
Operating income $1.30B $4.63B $686.21M
Net income $1.03B $4.52B $541.18M
Free cash flow $1.15B $3.83B $625.29M
R&D $330.60M – $98.16M
EPS (diluted) $21.90 $31.74 $14.58
Cash & equivalents $562.40M $3.74B $477.15M
Total debt $2.03B $58.43B $957.39M
Shares (diluted) 46.90M 142.40M 37.12M
Enterprise value $28.50B $65.77B $16.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTDYNOCCW
P/E 29.5x 17.3x 32.6x
P/FCF 26.4x 20.5x 28.2x
P/Operating cash flow 23.6x 14.9x 24.4x
P/S 4.6x 1.8x 4.8x
P/B 2.7x 4.2x 6.4x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 4.2x 7.8x
EV/EBITDA 19.3x 14.5x 22.5x
EV/EBIT 24.3x 19.2x 26.4x
EV/Revenue 4.9x 2.0x 5.0x
EV/FCF 27.7x 23.2x 28.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.8x 16.9x 25.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -49.75 17.01 1.58

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTDYNOCCW
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.6% 6.5% 10.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.5% 4.1% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.8% 9.8% 11.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.1% 3.4% 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 23.3% 6.8% 17.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 6.4% 14.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 25.5% 12.5% 19.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.3% -1.1% 19.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.2% 13.3% 22.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -0.6% 1.0% 20.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 11.9% 53.2% 25.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 12.5% 21.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 10.5% 108.8% 24.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.4% 22.3% 19.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTDYNOCCW
Gross margin 43.6% 20.0% 37.7%
EBITDA margin 25.3% 14.1% 22.0%
Operating margin 20.0% 10.6% 18.8%
Pretax margin 19.4% 12.0% 18.9%
Net margin 15.8% 10.4% 14.8%
FCF margin 17.6% 8.8% 17.1%
Operating cash flow margin 19.6% 12.1% 19.7%
Return on equity 9.3% 24.7% 20.0%
Return on assets 6.7% 8.8% 10.1%
Return on invested capital 8.1% 12.2% 14.7%
Return on capital employed 9.4% 12.2% 17.3%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.3% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTDYNOCCW
Debt / assets 13.0% 27.5% 17.5%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.8x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.9x 1.7x 0.6x
Debt / FCF 1.8x 3.8x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 28.5% 64.4% 49.2%
Equity / assets 71.5% 35.6% 50.8%
Interest coverage 26.9x 7.1x 16.2x
Current ratio 2.3x 1.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.0x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 5.66 3.08 6.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTDYNOCCW
Dividend yield – 1.7% 0.2%
Net buyback yield 1.5% 0.7% 2.5%
Shareholder yield 1.5% 2.4% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 30.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTDYNOCCW
Forward P/E 25.1xFY2026 17.9xFY2026 33.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $26.05FY2026 $30.81FY2026 $14.35FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.5%FY2026 +17.0%FY2026 +8.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.6% +3.7% +11.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.20BFY2026 $42.95BFY2026 $4.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.4%FY2026 +2.4%FY2026 +15.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.9% +3.7% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTDYNOCCW
Held by institutions 97.2% 83.4% 85.6%
Institutions holding 886 1,809 946
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.7% +0.3% +2.8%
Institutions buying 399 840 479
Institutions selling 327 639 313
Buyers to sellers 1.22 1.31 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TDYNOCCW
TDY 1.00 0.25 0.53
NOC 0.25 1.00 0.31
CW 0.53 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TDY, NOC and CW?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Teledyne Technologies (TDY) $30.28B, Northrop Grumman (NOC) $78.32B, Curtiss Wright (CW) $17.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, TDY, NOC and CW?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Teledyne Technologies (TDY) 29.5x, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 17.3x, Curtiss Wright (CW) 32.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Northrop Grumman (NOC) is cheapest (Teledyne Technologies (TDY) 25.1x, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 17.9x, Curtiss Wright (CW) 33.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Curtiss Wright (CW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Teledyne Technologies (TDY) +8.6%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) +6.5%, Curtiss Wright (CW) +10.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Teledyne Technologies (TDY) has the highest net margin (Teledyne Technologies (TDY) 15.8%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 10.4%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 14.8%). On return on invested capital, Curtiss Wright (CW) leads (Teledyne Technologies (TDY) 8.1%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 12.2%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 14.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teledyne Technologies (TDY) returned the most: Teledyne Technologies (TDY) +24.0%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) -7.5%, Curtiss Wright (CW) -16.8%. Over five years, Curtiss Wright (CW) compounded fastest (Teledyne Technologies (TDY) +8.0%/yr, Northrop Grumman (NOC) +9.0%/yr, Curtiss Wright (CW) +29.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) has the highest dividend yield: Northrop Grumman (NOC) 1.73%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 0.21%. Teledyne Technologies (TDY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Teledyne Technologies (TDY) has been the steadiest (Teledyne Technologies (TDY) 25.6%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 28.7%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 35.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TDY, NOC and CW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Northrop Grumman (NOC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.