TCOM vs AZUL vs BKNG Stock Comparison

Trip.com, Azul and Booking Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TCOM Trip.com Group Ltd
$38.57 -3.3% 1M -46.7% 1Y
Market cap
$25.34B
P/E
7.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Travel Services Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
AZUL Azul Sa
$3.74 -45.4% 1M
Market cap
$3.01B
P/E
131.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Airlines Industrials
1 win
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc.
$147.94 -9.7% 1M -27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$115.52B
P/E
16.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.24B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Trip.com leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Trip.com 5, Booking Holdings 4, Azul 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTCOMAZULBKNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.34B $3.01B $115.52B BKNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.4x 131.8x 16.0x TCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.6x 7.8x 13.6x AZUL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.1% — +12.9% TCOM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 36.1% — 25.5% TCOM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.3% — 75.5% BKNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -46.7% — -27.8% BKNG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.2%/yr — +8.9%/yr BKNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.2% 556.7% 37.9% TCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 — 60/100 TCOM

Percentile Scorecard

TCOMAZULBKNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTCOMAZULBKNG
Valuation 93 #3 of 28 19 #111 of 136 65 #59 of 166
Growth 79 #6 of 25 – 38 #95 of 152
Profitability 67 #9 of 25 – 100 #1 of 152
Financial Health 93 #3 of 30 1 #142 of 143 40 #107 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – 57 #41 of 94
Overall 83 – 60
  • TCOM ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • AZUL ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • BKNG ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTCOMAZULBKNGSPY
1 month -3.3%-45.4%-9.7% +0.9%
3 months -16.2%-55.2%-26.5% +5.9%
6 months -26.9%-4.1%-15.0% +8.5%
Year to date -46.4%—-30.9% +13.3%
1 year -46.7%—-27.8% +12.4%
3 years +9.2%—+34.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +3.0%—+10.4% +23.5%
5 years +35.0%—+52.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +6.2%—+8.9% +11.0%
10 years -13.8%—+150.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year -1.5%—+9.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureTCOMAZULBKNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.2%556.7%37.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.0%720.4%38.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.581.820.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.29—-0.73 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.9%-99.3%-39.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -51.2%-99.2%-32.7% -0.9%
52-week high $78.96$495.00$219.68 $779.14
52-week low $37.96$3.40$147.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTCOMAZULBKNG
P/E now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 18.2x 131.8xmedian 16.1x 15.8xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 1.5x 2.9xmedian 0.9x 3.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.1x —median 8.6x 11.6xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.4x -44.1xmedian 11.6x 11.7xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.5x —median 1.2x -10.3xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 0.30 —median 0.80 -0.27median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTCOMAZULBKNG
Revenue $9.45B – $28.24B
Gross profit $7.55B – –
Operating income $1.50B – $9.28B
Net income $3.42B – $7.21B
Free cash flow – – $9.54B
R&D $2.30B – –
EPS (diluted) $4.88 – $9.36
Cash & equivalents $8.26B $181.08M $17.21B
Total debt $18.23B $4.21B $20.18B
Shares (diluted) 698.38M 17.41B 770.00M
Enterprise value -$19.69B $2.12B $48.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTCOMAZULBKNG
P/E 7.4x 131.8x 15.8x
P/FCF – -44.1x 11.7x
P/Operating cash flow – – 11.3x
P/S 2.7x 2.9x 3.9x
P/B 1.1x – -10.3x
P/Tangible book 1.2x – -9.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 11.6x
EV/EBIT 11.5x – 12.3x
EV/Revenue 1.8x – 4.0x
EV/FCF – – 12.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 11.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 – -0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTCOMAZULBKNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.1% – 12.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.2% – 13.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 40.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -28.2% – 12.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 42.4% – 15.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 34.1% – 49.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 54.9% – 17.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.2% – -93.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 51.8% – -57.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 2.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 13.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 3.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 13.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTCOMAZULBKNG
Gross margin 80.0% – –
EBITDA margin – – 34.9%
Operating margin 15.9% – 32.9%
Pretax margin 45.7% – 32.9%
Net margin 36.1% – 25.5%
FCF margin – – 33.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – 34.9%
Return on equity 14.3% – –
Return on assets 8.9% – 25.1%
Return on invested capital 5.3% – 75.5%
Return on capital employed 6.1% – 121.7%
Asset turnover 0.2x – 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTCOMAZULBKNG
Debt / assets 10.2% 97.6% 68.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x – -1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.3x
Debt / FCF – – 2.1x
Liabilities / assets 38.0% 165.7% 136.3%
Equity / assets 62.0% – -36.3%
Interest coverage 19.8x – 8.4x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.0x 0.8x
Altman Z-score – – 5.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTCOMAZULBKNG
Dividend yield – – 0.8%
Net buyback yield – – 9.5%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 10.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTCOMAZULBKNG
Forward P/E 10.6xFY2026 7.8xFY2026 13.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.64FY2026 $0.48FY2026 $10.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -44.2%FY2026 – +19.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.0% +187.5% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.46BFY2026 $4.51BFY2026 $27.56BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.0%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026 +2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.9% +13.8% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTCOMAZULBKNG
Held by institutions 23.0% – 92.9%
Institutions holding 319 – 1,916
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% – -9.6%
Institutions buying 152 – 892
Institutions selling 119 – 828
Buyers to sellers 1.28 – 1.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TCOMAZULBKNG
TCOM 1.00 0.01 0.28
AZUL 0.01 1.00 0.00
BKNG 0.28 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TCOM, AZUL and BKNG?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Trip.com (TCOM) $25.34B, Azul (AZUL) $3.01B, Booking Holdings (BKNG) $115.52B.

Which stock is cheaper, TCOM, AZUL and BKNG?

Trip.com (TCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Trip.com (TCOM) 7.4x, Azul (AZUL) 131.8x, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 16.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Azul (AZUL) is cheapest (Trip.com (TCOM) 10.6x, Azul (AZUL) 7.8x, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 13.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Trip.com (TCOM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Trip.com (TCOM) +18.1%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) +12.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Trip.com (TCOM) has the highest net margin (Trip.com (TCOM) 36.1%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 25.5%). On return on invested capital, Booking Holdings (BKNG) leads (Trip.com (TCOM) 5.3%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 75.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Booking Holdings (BKNG) returned the most: Trip.com (TCOM) -46.7%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) -27.8%. Over five years, Booking Holdings (BKNG) compounded fastest (Trip.com (TCOM) +6.2%/yr, Booking Holdings (BKNG) +8.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trip.com (TCOM) has been the steadiest (Trip.com (TCOM) 36.2%, Azul (AZUL) 556.7%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 37.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TCOM, AZUL and BKNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trip.com (TCOM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.