TBTC vs BKNG vs DBD Stock Comparison

Table Trac, Booking Holdings and Diebold Nixdorf Prices as of Oct 22, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TBTC Table Trac Inc
$5.45 -2.0% 1M +23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$23.13M
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.33M
Div. yield
–
Restaurant and Retail Software Technology
4 wins
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc.
$155.83 0.0% 1M -23.5% 1Y
Market cap
$117.57B
P/E
16.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.24B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
6 wins
DBD DIEBOLD NIXDORF, Inc
$69.22 +9.7% 1M +19.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.36B
P/E
21.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.87B
Div. yield
–
Restaurant and Retail Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Booking Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Booking Holdings 6, Table Trac 4, Diebold Nixdorf 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTBTCBKNGDBDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.13M $117.57B $2.36B BKNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.6x 16.3x 21.3x TBTC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.3x 12.3x DBD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.3% +12.9% +5.4% TBTC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.1% 25.5% 2.9% BKNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 75.5% 9.1% BKNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.3x 1.7x BKNG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.9% -23.5% +19.7% TBTC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.1%/yr +10.2%/yr — BKNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.9% 38.0% 40.3% BKNG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 60/100 72/100 TBTC

Percentile Scorecard

TBTCBKNGDBD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTBTCBKNGDBD
Valuation 91 #9 of 90 66 #57 of 167 92 #8 of 90
Growth 62 #32 of 82 38 #96 of 153 78 #19 of 82
Profitability 86 #12 of 77 99 #2 of 153 61 #31 of 77
Financial Health 97 #4 of 96 39 #109 of 179 35 #63 of 96
Shareholder Returns 62 #21 of 54 59 #39 of 94 93 #5 of 54
Overall 79 60 72
  • TBTC ranked among 99 companies in Vertical Software
  • BKNG ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • DBD ranked among 99 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTBTCBKNGDBDSPY
1 month -2.0%0.0%+9.7% -1.0%
3 months +23.9%-12.2%-22.5% +2.9%
6 months +6.4%-13.5%-19.2% +6.4%
Year to date +29.1%-27.3%+2.0% +11.4%
1 year +23.9%-23.5%+19.7% +13.1%
3 years +32.3%+37.4%+265.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year +9.8%+11.2%+54.1% +21.5%
5 years +47.3%+62.7%— +67.7%
5 years, per year +8.1%+10.2%— +10.9%
10 years +263.3%+165.5%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +13.8%+10.3%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTBTCBKNGDBDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.9%38.0%40.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.0%38.2%44.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.360.861.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.40-0.620.49 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.4%-39.5%-33.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.0%-29.1%-23.7% -2.5%
52-week high $6.19$219.68$90.73 $779.14
52-week low $3.70$154.13$56.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTBTCBKNGDBD
P/E now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 42.7x 16.6xmedian 17.5x 21.4xmedian 42.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.7x 4.1xmedian 1.4x 0.6xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 19.0x 12.2xmedian 14.9x 8.0xmedian 19.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 19.6x 12.3xmedian 11.2x 9.9xmedian 19.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.8x -10.9xmedian 1.7x 2.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.46median 1.75 -0.29median 0.42 0.69median 1.75

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTBTCBKNGDBD
Revenue $13.33M $28.24B $3.87B
Gross profit $9.42M – $977.60M
Operating income $2.96M $9.28B $246.30M
Net income $2.68M $7.21B $113.90M
Free cash flow $1.15M $9.54B $238.10M
R&D – – $84.30M
EPS (diluted) $0.57 $9.36 $3.15
Cash & equivalents $8.15M $17.21B $282.40M
Total debt – $20.18B $942.90M
Shares (diluted) 4.68M 770.00M 35.30M
Enterprise value -$9.64M $50.62B $1.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTBTCBKNGDBD
P/E 9.4x 16.6x 21.4x
P/FCF 21.9x 12.3x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow 21.4x 11.9x 8.6x
P/S 1.9x 4.1x 0.6x
P/B 1.8x -10.9x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.8x -10.1x 10.1x
EV/EBITDA 5.7x 12.2x 8.0x
EV/EBIT 5.8x 12.9x 12.2x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 4.3x 0.8x
EV/FCF 14.9x 12.6x 12.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.5x 12.2x 11.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.46 -0.29 0.69

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTBTCBKNGDBD
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.3% 12.9% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 13.4% 2.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.2% – 8.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.6% – 4.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 68.1% 12.9% 42.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.3% 15.3% 97.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 58.8% 49.8% 1,019%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 21.0% 17.4% 28.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 58.1% -93.7% 1,016%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 20.4% -57.3% 31.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -45.4% 2.9% 16.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.2% 13.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -44.2% 3.2% 12.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.0% 13.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTBTCBKNGDBD
Gross margin 70.6% – 25.2%
EBITDA margin 22.6% 34.9% 9.7%
Operating margin 22.2% 32.9% 6.4%
Pretax margin 25.4% 32.9% 4.2%
Net margin 20.1% 25.5% 2.9%
FCF margin 8.7% 33.8% 6.1%
Operating cash flow margin 8.9% 34.9% 7.1%
Return on equity 19.5% – 11.4%
Return on assets 17.1% 25.1% 3.0%
Return on invested capital – 75.5% 9.1%
Return on capital employed 20.0% 121.7% 10.1%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.0x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.4x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 2.1% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTBTCBKNGDBD
Debt / assets – 68.0% 25.2%
Debt / equity – -1.9x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.3x 1.7x
Debt / FCF – 2.1x 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 13.0% 136.3% 73.9%
Equity / assets 87.0% -36.3% 26.1%
Interest coverage – 8.4x 2.7x
Current ratio 16.6x 1.1x 1.3x
Quick ratio 13.6x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 9.6x 0.8x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 10.57 5.83 1.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTBTCBKNGDBD
Dividend yield 3.3% 1.1% –
Net buyback yield – 9.0% 9.0%
Shareholder yield 3.3% 10.0% 9.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTBTCBKNGDBD
Forward P/E – 14.3xFY2026 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $10.90FY2026 $5.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +19.5%FY2026 +0.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +16.8% +31.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $27.56BFY2026 $4.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +2.4%FY2026 +8.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +11.5% +3.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTBTCBKNGDBD
Held by institutions – 92.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 1,915 213
Change in shares held, QoQ – -9.6% +8.6%
Institutions buying – 891 129
Institutions selling – 828 61
Buyers to sellers – 1.08 2.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TBTCBKNGDBD
TBTC 1.00 0.05 0.06
BKNG 0.05 1.00 0.17
DBD 0.06 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TBTC, BKNG and DBD?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Table Trac (TBTC) $23.13M, Booking Holdings (BKNG) $117.57B, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) $2.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, TBTC, BKNG and DBD?

Table Trac (TBTC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Table Trac (TBTC) 8.6x, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 16.3x, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) 21.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) is cheapest (Booking Holdings (BKNG) 14.3x, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Table Trac (TBTC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Table Trac (TBTC) +15.3%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) +12.9%, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) has the highest net margin (Table Trac (TBTC) 20.1%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 25.5%, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Booking Holdings (BKNG) leads (Booking Holdings (BKNG) 75.5%, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) 9.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Table Trac (TBTC) returned the most: Table Trac (TBTC) +23.9%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) -23.5%, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) +19.7%. Over five years, Booking Holdings (BKNG) compounded fastest (Table Trac (TBTC) +8.1%/yr, Booking Holdings (BKNG) +10.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Booking Holdings (BKNG) has been the steadiest (Table Trac (TBTC) 58.9%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 38.0%, Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) 40.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TBTC, BKNG and DBD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Booking Holdings (BKNG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.