TAK vs NVS vs ABBV Stock Comparison

Takeda Pharmaceutical, Novartis Ag and AbbVie Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NVS Novartis Ag
$153.75 +5.7% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$304.05B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$54.77B
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
5 wins
ABBV AbbVie Inc.
$286.86 +8.5% 1M +25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$507.17B
P/E
80.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$64.39B
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Novartis Ag leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Novartis Ag 5, AbbVie 4, Takeda Pharmaceutical 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTAKNVSABBVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $63.90B $304.05B $507.17B ABBV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 111.3x 19.3x 80.4x NVS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 51.1x 16.6x 21.4x NVS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.7% +2.8% +10.4% ABBV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% 28.8% 9.8% NVS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.5% 34.9% 18.7% NVS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.5x — 2.6x ABBV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +45.8% +17.9% +25.8% TAK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.1%/yr +13.2%/yr +21.5%/yr ABBV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.5% 27.8% 26.0% TAK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 71/100 68/100 NVS

Percentile Scorecard

TAKNVSABBV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTAKNVSABBV
Valuation 97 #18 of 626 90 #63 of 626 95 #31 of 626
Growth 21 #480 of 604 54 #276 of 604 54 #281 of 604
Profitability 85 #84 of 555 96 #26 of 555 95 #30 of 555
Financial Health 34 #433 of 658 43 #377 of 658 16 #554 of 658
Shareholder Returns 74 #97 of 368 73 #99 of 368 80 #74 of 368
Overall 62 71 68
  • TAK ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NVS ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ABBV ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTAKNVSABBVSPY
1 month +8.3%+5.7%+8.5% -0.8%
3 months +17.1%-1.5%+11.7% +3.5%
6 months +24.9%+6.6%+45.3% +7.0%
Year to date +31.0%+11.5%+25.5% +12.2%
1 year +45.8%+17.9%+25.8% +13.0%
3 years +51.7%+66.6%+106.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +14.9%+18.6%+27.4% +23.1%
5 years +47.8%+85.8%+164.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +8.1%+13.2%+21.5% +11.0%
10 years -11.4%+116.2%+370.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year -1.2%+8.0%+16.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureTAKNVSABBVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.5%27.8%26.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.3%30.7%24.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.33-0.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.130.640.99 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -26.4%-20.4%-24.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-8.8%-0.7% -1.8%
52-week high $20.43$168.62$288.96 $779.14
52-week low $13.23$121.80$197.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTAKNVSABBV
P/E now vs peer median 112.1xmedian 17.1x 18.9xmedian 17.1x 80.4xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 8.8x 5.4xmedian 8.8x 7.9xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.4xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x 23.0xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 18.0x 15.1xmedian 18.0x 27.8xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.1x 7.0xmedian 2.1x -85.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -2.76median 0.31 0.58median 0.31 -7.96median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTAKNVSABBV
Revenue $46.49B $54.77B $64.39B
Gross profit $30.58B $42.37B $46.02B
Operating income $2.71B $17.10B $16.87B
Net income -$1.04B $12.75B $6.32B
Free cash flow $5.20B $19.38B $18.21B
R&D $4.53B $11.69B $9.71B
EPS (diluted) $0.18 $8.07 $3.56
Cash & equivalents $2.85B $7.62B $6.57B
Total debt $126.30B $31.01B $70.82B
Shares (diluted) 3.15B 1.96B 1.77B
Enterprise value $40.27B $268.04B $480.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTAKNVSABBV
P/E 112.1x 18.9x 80.4x
P/FCF 12.5x 15.1x 27.8x
P/Operating cash flow 10.4x 16.0x 26.0x
P/S 1.4x 5.4x 7.9x
P/B 1.4x 7.0x -85.4x
P/Tangible book 2.5x -2,292x -9.2x
EV/EBITDA 12.4x – 23.0x
EV/EBIT 33.3x 17.3x 33.9x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 5.4x 8.9x
EV/FCF 17.4x 15.2x 31.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.4x 16.1x 29.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.76 0.58 -7.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTAKNVSABBV
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.7% 2.8% 10.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.8% 8.1% 4.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.8% 0.7% 11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.2% 9.5% 6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -43.4% 2.5% 53.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -14.3% 23.8% -1.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -209.1% -6.5% 67.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -35.3% 21.7% -10.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -75.7% -9.6% 67.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -40.6% 32.3% -10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -14.8% -11.5% 1.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.4% 6.2% -8.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -13.3% -10.2% -0.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.2% 7.0% -9.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTAKNVSABBV
Gross margin 65.8% 77.4% 71.5%
EBITDA margin 15.6% – 38.5%
Operating margin 5.8% 31.2% 26.2%
Pretax margin 2.6% 28.3% 13.5%
Net margin 1.2% 28.8% 9.8%
FCF margin 11.2% 35.4% 28.3%
Operating cash flow margin 13.5% 33.6% 30.3%
Return on equity 1.2% 31.5% –
Return on assets 0.6% 10.6% 4.7%
Return on invested capital 3.5% 34.9% 18.7%
Return on capital employed 3.0% 19.3% 17.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -6.0x 1.4x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTAKNVSABBV
Debt / assets 32.0% 7.9% 52.4%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.2x -11.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.5x – 2.6x
Debt / FCF 6.0x 0.5x 3.9x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 65.6% 104.4%
Equity / assets 48.3% 34.4% -4.4%
Interest coverage 0.8x 36.7x –
Current ratio 3.2x 0.9x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.58 – 2.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTAKNVSABBV
Dividend yield 1.5% 3.1% 2.4%
Net buyback yield 1.0% -1.5% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 2.5% 1.6% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTAKNVSABBV
Forward P/E 51.1xFY2026 16.6xFY2026 21.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.40FY2026 $9.26FY2026 $13.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.3%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026 +33.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +62.5% +1.2% +25.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.27BFY2026 $53.95BFY2026 $69.55BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.8%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.9% +19.1% -0.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTAKNVSABBV
Held by institutions 3.3% 7.0% 74.9%
Institutions holding 378 1,607 4,173
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% -5.9% +2.6%
Institutions buying 212 662 2,201
Institutions selling 98 560 1,502
Buyers to sellers 2.16 1.18 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TAKNVSABBV
TAK 1.00 0.49 0.37
NVS 0.49 1.00 0.50
ABBV 0.37 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TAK, NVS and ABBV?

AbbVie (ABBV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) $63.90B, Novartis Ag (NVS) $304.05B, AbbVie (ABBV) $507.17B.

Which stock is cheaper, TAK, NVS and ABBV?

Novartis Ag (NVS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 111.3x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 19.3x, AbbVie (ABBV) 80.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Novartis Ag (NVS) is cheapest (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 51.1x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 16.6x, AbbVie (ABBV) 21.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

AbbVie (ABBV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) +0.7%, Novartis Ag (NVS) +2.8%, AbbVie (ABBV) +10.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Novartis Ag (NVS) has the highest net margin (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 1.2%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 28.8%, AbbVie (ABBV) 9.8%). On return on invested capital, Novartis Ag (NVS) leads (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 3.5%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 34.9%, AbbVie (ABBV) 18.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) returned the most: Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) +45.8%, Novartis Ag (NVS) +17.9%, AbbVie (ABBV) +25.8%. Over five years, AbbVie (ABBV) compounded fastest (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) +8.1%/yr, Novartis Ag (NVS) +13.2%/yr, AbbVie (ABBV) +21.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) has been the steadiest (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 21.5%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 27.8%, AbbVie (ABBV) 26.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TAK, NVS and ABBV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Novartis Ag (NVS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.