T vs CHT vs TMUS Stock Comparison

At&T, Chunghwa Telecom and T-Mobile US Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
T At&T Inc.
$20.93 -17.3% 1M -15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$142.41B
P/E
11.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$128.85B
Div. yield
0.06%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
3 wins
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.54 +5.1% 1M +12.4% 1Y
Market cap
$37.43B
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
–
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
4 wins
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc.
$146.54 -11.5% 1M -33.4% 1Y
Market cap
$158.88B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$92.19B
Div. yield
0.03%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

T-Mobile US leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (T-Mobile US 5, Chunghwa Telecom 4, At&T 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTCHTTMUSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $142.41B $37.43B $158.88B TMUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.0x 28.0x 15.0x T
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.4x 28.2x 12.9x T
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.5% +8.3% +9.7% TMUS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.1% 17.0% 11.5% CHT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.9% 10.7% 9.9% CHT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.4x — 2.5x TMUS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.06% 0.00% 0.03% T
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -15.0% +12.4% -33.4% CHT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.7%/yr +4.1%/yr +4.6%/yr TMUS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.8% 13.9% 35.6% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 53/100 67/100 TMUS

Percentile Scorecard

TCHTTMUS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTCHTTMUS
Valuation 73 #14 of 49 23 #38 of 49 48 #26 of 49
Growth 44 #26 of 46 53 #22 of 46 78 #11 of 46
Profitability 71 #14 of 46 53 #22 of 46 87 #7 of 46
Financial Health 41 #30 of 50 94 #4 of 50 43 #29 of 50
Shareholder Returns 60 #15 of 36 40 #22 of 36 80 #8 of 36
Overall 58 53 67
  • T ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • CHT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • TMUS ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTCHTTMUSSPY
1 month -17.3%+5.1%-11.5% -1.0%
3 months -13.2%+13.4%-18.6% +2.9%
6 months -20.1%+12.8%-22.8% +6.4%
Year to date -15.7%+16.4%-27.8% +11.4%
1 year -15.0%+12.4%-33.4% +13.1%
3 years +34.8%+35.2%+3.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +10.5%+10.6%+1.3% +21.5%
5 years +8.7%+22.5%+25.4% +67.7%
5 years, per year +1.7%+4.1%+4.6% +10.9%
10 years -26.1%+38.9%+213.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year -3.0%+3.3%+12.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureTCHTTMUSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.8%13.9%35.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.2%14.8%42.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.390.10-0.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.500.89-0.94 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.9%-26.5%-46.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.1%-0.4%-34.0% -2.5%
52-week high $29.10$48.73$221.98 $779.14
52-week low $20.49$40.74$146.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTCHTTMUS
P/E now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 11.6x 28.1xmedian 11.6x 15.0xmedian 11.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.1x 4.8xmedian 1.1x 1.7xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x 7.3xmedian 6.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 5.6x 60.2xmedian 5.6x 8.6xmedian 5.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.3x 3.3xmedian 1.3x 2.8xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.23median 0.24 2.09median 0.24 0.63median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTCHTTMUS
Revenue $128.85B $7.90B $92.19B
Gross profit $102.21B $2.88B $57.33B
Operating income $23.58B $1.61B $18.25B
Net income $13.14B $1.34B $10.56B
Free cash flow $17.82B $625.04M $18.40B
R&D – $144.76M –
EPS (diluted) $1.90 $1.72 $9.76
Cash & equivalents $10.77B $1.32B $2.83B
Total debt $581.46B $620.49M $84.62B
Shares (diluted) 6.84B 777.60M 1.08B
Enterprise value $83.87B $29.44B $143.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTCHTTMUS
P/E 11.0x 28.1x 15.0x
P/FCF 7.9x 60.2x 8.6x
P/Operating cash flow 3.5x – 5.5x
P/S 1.1x 4.8x 1.7x
P/B 1.1x 3.3x 2.8x
P/Tangible book -5.3x 3.3x -3.8x
EV/EBITDA 6.6x – 7.3x
EV/EBIT 12.3x 22.0x 13.1x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 4.5x 2.6x
EV/FCF 16.3x 56.5x 13.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.2x – 8.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.23 2.09 0.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTCHTTMUS
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.5% 8.3% 9.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.9% 3.2% 5.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.0% 7.9% 7.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 2.8% 7.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.5% 6.9% -5.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 116.3% 1.1% 17.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -38.2% 8.2% -13.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.2% -0.8% 19.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -38.6% 52.6% -9.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.1% 13.5% 23.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.5% – 13.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.6% – 18.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -10.7% -11.2% 11.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.5% 2.4% 62.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTCHTTMUS
Gross margin 79.3% 36.5% 62.2%
EBITDA margin 33.9% – 35.4%
Operating margin 18.3% 20.3% 19.8%
Pretax margin 14.1% 21.0% 15.0%
Net margin 10.1% 17.0% 11.5%
FCF margin 13.8% 7.9% 20.0%
Operating cash flow margin 31.2% – 31.3%
Return on equity 11.7% 11.3% 18.8%
Return on assets 3.3% 1.9% 4.9%
Return on invested capital 6.9% 10.7% 9.9%
Return on capital employed 6.3% 2.4% 9.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.1x – 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTCHTTMUS
Debt / assets 35.8% 1.1% 39.6%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.0x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.4x – 2.5x
Debt / FCF 9.0x 0.3x 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 72.5% 34.0% 73.7%
Equity / assets 27.5% 66.0% 26.3%
Interest coverage 3.2x 144.6x –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.2x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.0x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.7x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.76 6.04 1.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTCHTTMUS
Dividend yield 5.3% 3.3% 2.8%
Net buyback yield 6.6% – 7.7%
Shareholder yield 11.9% 3.3% 10.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 60.4% – 41.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) 44.5% – 23.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) -3.3% – 15.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -0.8% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTCHTTMUS
Forward P/E 8.4xFY2026 28.2xFY2026 12.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.48FY2026 $1.72FY2026 $11.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.0%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +6.5% +3.5% +30.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $125.70BFY2026 $7.64BFY2026 $96.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.0%FY2026 +2.2%FY2026 +9.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.9% +12.1% +6.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTCHTTMUS
Held by institutions 66.0% 2.6% 43.1%
Institutions holding 2,675 218 1,656
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% +1.3% +4.7%
Institutions buying 1,266 136 849
Institutions selling 1,152 47 630
Buyers to sellers 1.10 2.89 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TCHTTMUS
T 1.00 0.23 0.71
CHT 0.23 1.00 0.16
TMUS 0.71 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, T, CHT and TMUS?

T-Mobile US (TMUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: At&T (T) $142.41B, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.43B, T-Mobile US (TMUS) $158.88B.

Which stock is cheaper, T, CHT and TMUS?

At&T (T) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (At&T (T) 11.0x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.0x, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 15.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, At&T (T) is cheapest (At&T (T) 8.4x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.2x, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 12.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

T-Mobile US (TMUS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: At&T (T) +3.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) +9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has the highest net margin (At&T (T) 10.1%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 11.5%). On return on invested capital, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads (At&T (T) 6.9%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 9.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) returned the most: At&T (T) -15.0%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +12.4%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) -33.4%. Over five years, T-Mobile US (TMUS) compounded fastest (At&T (T) +1.7%/yr, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.1%/yr, T-Mobile US (TMUS) +4.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

At&T (T) has the highest dividend yield: At&T (T) 0.06%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 0.00%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 0.03%. Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (At&T (T) 29.8%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 35.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, T, CHT and TMUS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, T-Mobile US (TMUS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.