STKH vs SSYS vs NNDM Stock Comparison

Steakholder Foods, Stratasys and Nano Dimension Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSYS Stratasys Ltd.
$7.15 -14.9% 1M -38.0% 1Y
Market cap
$615.69M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$547.27M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
3 wins
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.42 -9.0% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$299.39M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$120.89M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Nano Dimension leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Nano Dimension 4, Stratasys 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSTKHSSYSNNDMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.13K $615.69M $299.39M SSYS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -12.7x -0.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 71.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -3.1% +73.5% NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -8.4% -349.5% SSYS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -28.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -89.5% -38.0% -16.0% NNDM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -83.4%/yr -25.7%/yr -24.8%/yr NNDM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 225.6% 47.7% 53.1% SSYS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 37/100 48/100 NNDM

Percentile Scorecard

STKHSSYSNNDM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSTKHSSYSNNDM
Valuation – 36 #131 of 203 39 #125 of 203
Growth – 21 #148 of 188 56 #84 of 188
Profitability – 13 #161 of 184 7 #172 of 184
Financial Health 75 #55 of 217 79 #46 of 217 91 #20 of 217
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – 37 48
  • STKH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SSYS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • NNDM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSTKHSSYSNNDMSPY
1 month -76.7%-14.9%-9.0% +0.9%
3 months -86.0%-6.8%-4.7% +5.9%
6 months -79.5%-15.6%-15.0% +8.5%
Year to date -83.5%-17.6%-7.8% +13.3%
1 year -89.5%-38.0%-16.0% +12.4%
3 years -99.9%-30.2%-45.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year -88.9%-11.3%-18.2% +23.5%
5 years -100.0%-77.3%-75.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -83.4%-25.7%-24.8% +11.0%
10 years —-62.4%-97.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year —-9.3%-32.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSTKHSSYSNNDMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 225.6%47.7%53.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 172.3%46.6%57.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.642.231.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.40-0.80-0.30 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-83.4%-80.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.2%-38.5%-33.6% -0.9%
52-week high $4.30$11.62$2.14 $779.14
52-week low $0.38$6.80$1.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSTKHSSYSNNDM
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.4x -12.7xmedian 25.4x -0.7xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.9x 1.1xmedian 1.9x 2.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.3x -12.2xmedian 14.3x 0.3xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.8x -26.5xmedian 21.8x -5.8xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.2x 0.8xmedian 2.2x 0.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.41 -29.23median 1.41 0.00median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSTKHSSYSNNDM
Revenue – $547.27M $120.89M
Gross profit – $221.15M $46.88M
Operating income – -$83.46M -$143.53M
Net income – -$115.18M -$139.91M
Free cash flow – -$23.24M -$51.44M
R&D – $77.20M $29.99M
EPS (diluted) – $-0.56 $-2.02
Cash & equivalents $1.06M $92.53M $349.11M
Total debt – – $14.82M
Shares (diluted) 124.02K 82.30M 209.34M
Enterprise value -$6.85M -$334.13M -$911.78M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSTKHSSYSNNDM
P/E – -12.7x -0.7x
P/FCF – -26.5x -5.8x
P/Operating cash flow – -134.4x -5.9x
P/S – 1.1x 2.5x
P/B 0.0x 0.8x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 0.8x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA – -12.2x 0.3x
EV/EBIT – -4.8x 0.3x
EV/Revenue – 0.7x -0.4x
EV/FCF – -17.3x 0.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – -88.0x 0.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -29.23 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSTKHSSYSNNDM
Revenue growth (1Y) – -3.1% 73.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -4.6% 32.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -12.3% 88.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -6.6% 27.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -30.0% -9.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -9.0% -35.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – -17.1% -154.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -37.3% 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 59.7% -112.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% -428.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -172.1% 25.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 61.1% 21.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -116.2% 28.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 36.4% 17.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSTKHSSYSNNDM
Gross margin – 40.4% 38.8%
EBITDA margin – -6.1% -117.1%
Operating margin – -15.3% -118.7%
Pretax margin – -13.1% -121.7%
Net margin – -8.4% -349.5%
FCF margin – -4.2% -42.6%
Operating cash flow margin – -0.8% -41.9%
Return on equity – -14.0% -33.8%
Return on assets – -10.9% -28.9%
Return on invested capital – – -28.1%
Return on capital employed – -9.3% -27.7%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.0x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 4.3% 6.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSTKHSSYSNNDM
Debt / assets – – 0.6%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.4x
Debt / FCF – – -0.1x
Liabilities / assets 27.9% 22.0% 13.5%
Equity / assets 72.1% 78.0% 86.5%
Interest coverage – – -341.7x
Current ratio 1.8x 3.5x 10.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x 2.3x 8.0x
Cash ratio 1.2x 1.3x 7.5x
Altman Z-score – -0.98 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSTKHSSYSNNDM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSTKHSSYSNNDM
Forward P/E – 71.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-550.39FY2026 $0.10FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -33.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +100.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $57.45MFY2025 $582.47MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +574,390.0%FY2025 +5.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -42.2% +6.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSTKHSSYSNNDM
Held by institutions – 50.8% 31.9%
Institutions holding – 150 107
Change in shares held, QoQ – +7.3% +13.9%
Institutions buying – 79 51
Institutions selling – 29 25
Buyers to sellers – 2.72 2.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

STKHSSYSNNDM
STKH 1.00 0.01 -0.01
SSYS 0.01 1.00 0.37
NNDM -0.01 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, STKH, SSYS and NNDM?

Stratasys (SSYS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Steakholder Foods (STKH) $47.13K, Stratasys (SSYS) $615.69M, Nano Dimension (NNDM) $299.39M.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Stratasys (SSYS) -3.1%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) +73.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Stratasys (SSYS) has the highest net margin (Stratasys (SSYS) -8.4%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -349.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nano Dimension (NNDM) returned the most: Steakholder Foods (STKH) -89.5%, Stratasys (SSYS) -38.0%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -16.0%. Over five years, Nano Dimension (NNDM) compounded fastest (Steakholder Foods (STKH) -83.4%/yr, Stratasys (SSYS) -25.7%/yr, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -24.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Stratasys (SSYS) has been the steadiest (Steakholder Foods (STKH) 225.6%, Stratasys (SSYS) 47.7%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) 53.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, STKH, SSYS and NNDM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nano Dimension (NNDM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.