STKH vs GE vs NNDM Stock Comparison

Steakholder Foods, General Electric and Nano Dimension Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GE General Electric Co
$301.37 -5.3% 1M -2.7% 1Y
Market cap
$311.42B
P/E
34.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$52.58B
Div. yield
0.59%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
6 wins
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.42 -9.0% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$299.39M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$120.89M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

General Electric leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (General Electric 6, Nano Dimension 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSTKHGENNDMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.13K $311.42B $299.39M GE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 34.3x -0.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 39.7x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +19.6% +73.5% NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 17.3% -349.5% GE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -38.7% -28.1% NNDM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.7x 2.4x GE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.59% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -89.5% -2.7% -16.0% GE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -83.4%/yr +35.8%/yr -24.8%/yr GE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 225.6% 33.2% 53.1% GE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 45/100 48/100 NNDM

Percentile Scorecard

STKHGENNDM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSTKHGENNDM
Valuation – 32 #68 of 100 39 #125 of 203
Growth – 33 #65 of 97 56 #84 of 188
Profitability – 57 #42 of 96 7 #172 of 184
Financial Health 75 #55 of 217 18 #86 of 105 91 #20 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 84 #11 of 65 –
Overall – 45 48
  • STKH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • GE ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NNDM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSTKHGENNDMSPY
1 month -76.7%-5.3%-9.0% +0.9%
3 months -86.0%-14.1%-4.7% +5.9%
6 months -79.5%+6.3%-15.0% +8.5%
Year to date -83.5%-2.2%-7.8% +13.3%
1 year -89.5%-2.7%-16.0% +12.4%
3 years -99.9%+255.1%-45.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year -88.9%+52.6%-18.2% +23.5%
5 years -100.0%+361.2%-75.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -83.4%+35.8%-24.8% +11.0%
10 years —+115.2%-97.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+8.0%-32.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSTKHGENNDMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 225.6%33.2%53.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 172.3%35.3%57.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.641.221.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.40-0.08-0.30 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-45.1%-80.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.2%-20.9%-33.6% -0.9%
52-week high $4.30$381.07$2.14 $779.14
52-week low $0.38$273.25$1.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSTKHGENNDM
P/E now vs peer median —median 25.4x 34.3xmedian 26.4x -0.7xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.9x 5.9xmedian 3.0x 2.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.3x -21.0xmedian 14.5x 0.3xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.8x 39.0xmedian 26.1x -5.8xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.2x 17.5xmedian 2.5x 0.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.41 -119.97median 0.90 0.00median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSTKHGENNDM
Revenue – $52.58B $120.89M
Gross profit – $18.52B $46.88M
Operating income – -$16.58B -$143.53M
Net income – $9.13B -$139.91M
Free cash flow – $7.99B -$51.44M
R&D – $1.81B $29.99M
EPS (diluted) – $8.74 $-2.02
Cash & equivalents $1.06M $8.76B $349.11M
Total debt – $19.33B $14.82M
Shares (diluted) 124.02K 1.04B 209.34M
Enterprise value -$6.85M $270.17B -$911.78M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSTKHGENNDM
P/E – 34.3x -0.7x
P/FCF – 39.0x -5.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 33.0x -5.9x
P/S – 5.9x 2.5x
P/B 0.0x 17.5x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 22.7x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA – -21.0x 0.3x
EV/EBIT – -19.4x 0.3x
EV/Revenue – 6.1x -0.4x
EV/FCF – 40.3x 0.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 34.2x 0.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -119.97 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSTKHGENNDM
Revenue growth (1Y) – 19.6% 73.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% 32.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 11.7% 88.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.9% 27.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 13.2% -9.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -98.5% -35.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 13.2% -154.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -3.4% 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 15.5% -112.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -0.3% -428.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 21.4% 25.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% 21.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 20.1% 28.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 2.7% 17.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSTKHGENNDM
Gross margin – 35.2% 38.8%
EBITDA margin – -29.1% -117.1%
Operating margin – -31.5% -118.7%
Pretax margin – 20.3% -121.7%
Net margin – 17.3% -349.5%
FCF margin – 15.2% -42.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 17.9% -41.9%
Return on equity – 51.2% -33.8%
Return on assets – 7.2% -28.9%
Return on invested capital – -38.7% -28.1%
Return on capital employed – -19.5% -27.7%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.0x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 6.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSTKHGENNDM
Debt / assets – 15.2% 0.6%
Debt / equity – 1.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.7x 2.4x
Debt / FCF – 2.4x -0.1x
Liabilities / assets 27.9% 86.0% 13.5%
Equity / assets 72.1% 14.0% 86.5%
Interest coverage – -17.9x -341.7x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.0x 10.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.6x 8.0x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.2x 7.5x
Altman Z-score – 2.70 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSTKHGENNDM
Dividend yield – 0.6% –
Net buyback yield – 2.7% –
Shareholder yield – 3.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 21.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 26.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 36.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSTKHGENNDM
Forward P/E – 39.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-550.39FY2026 $7.59FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +19.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +28.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $57.45MFY2025 $54.10BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +574,390.0%FY2025 +27.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -42.2% +11.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSTKHGENNDM
Held by institutions – 79.4% 31.9%
Institutions holding – 3,443 107
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.5% +13.9%
Institutions buying – 1,830 51
Institutions selling – 1,149 25
Buyers to sellers – 1.59 2.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

STKHGENNDM
STKH 1.00 0.05 -0.01
GE 0.05 1.00 0.19
NNDM -0.01 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, STKH, GE and NNDM?

General Electric (GE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Steakholder Foods (STKH) $47.13K, General Electric (GE) $311.42B, Nano Dimension (NNDM) $299.39M.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: General Electric (GE) +19.6%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) +73.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

General Electric (GE) has the highest net margin (General Electric (GE) 17.3%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -349.5%). On return on invested capital, Nano Dimension (NNDM) leads (General Electric (GE) -38.7%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -28.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year General Electric (GE) returned the most: Steakholder Foods (STKH) -89.5%, General Electric (GE) -2.7%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -16.0%. Over five years, General Electric (GE) compounded fastest (Steakholder Foods (STKH) -83.4%/yr, General Electric (GE) +35.8%/yr, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -24.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: General Electric (GE) 0.59%. Steakholder Foods (STKH) and Nano Dimension (NNDM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, General Electric (GE) has been the steadiest (Steakholder Foods (STKH) 225.6%, General Electric (GE) 33.2%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) 53.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, STKH, GE and NNDM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, General Electric (GE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.