STHO vs FRPH vs OZ Stock Comparison

Star Holdings, Frp Holdings and Belpointe PREP Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
STHO Star Holdings
$7.49 -9.0% 1M -4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$90.61M
P/E
6.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$93.77M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
5 wins
FRPH Frp Holdings, Inc.
$18.67 -11.6% 1M -23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$352.15M
P/E
258.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.62M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
4 wins
OZ Belpointe PREP, LLC
$34.53 -22.0% 1M -46.0% 1Y
Market cap
$132.96M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Star Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Star Holdings 5, Frp Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSTHOFRPHOZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.61M $352.15M $132.96M FRPH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 6.5x 258.7x — STHO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -17.7% +3.1% — FRPH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.8% 3.1% — STHO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.0x 6.4x — STHO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.1% -23.9% -46.0% STHO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -8.5%/yr -19.2%/yr FRPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.7% 25.8% 32.7% FRPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 32/100 — STHO

Percentile Scorecard

STHOFRPHOZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSTHOFRPHOZ
Valuation 26 #29 of 39 24 #30 of 39 –
Growth 68 #11 of 32 13 #28 of 32 –
Profitability 21 #23 of 29 50 #15 of 29 –
Financial Health 27 #28 of 38 41 #23 of 38 –
Shareholder Returns 85 #3 of 14 – –
Overall 45 32 –
  • STHO ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FRPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OZ ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSTHOFRPHOZSPY
1 month -9.0%-11.6%-22.0% -0.2%
3 months -20.3%-20.2%-23.9% +3.9%
6 months -11.0%-13.7%-32.3% +8.2%
Year to date -9.0%-18.1%-46.9% +12.9%
1 year -4.1%-23.9%-46.0% +12.3%
3 years -30.6%-30.9%-50.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -11.5%-11.6%-20.6% +23.3%
5 years —-35.7%-65.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-8.5%-19.2% +10.9%
10 years —+17.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+1.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSTHOFRPHOZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.7%25.8%32.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.2%26.7%38.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.660.260.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.13-0.93-1.41 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.8%-42.6%-66.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.6%-27.0%-49.2% -1.2%
52-week high $9.93$25.56$67.99 $779.14
52-week low $7.01$18.67$34.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSTHOFRPHOZ
P/E now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 7.9x 261.1xmedian 7.9x —median 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 4.7x 8.2xmedian 4.7x —median 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -3.1xmedian 11.2x 26.6xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 6.2x —median 6.2x —median 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.6x 0.8xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.24median 0.32 -8.03median 0.32 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSTHOFRPHOZ
Revenue $93.77M $43.62M –
Gross profit $15.01M – –
Operating income -$91.00M $6.16M –
Net income $3.99M $1.32M –
Free cash flow -$68.76M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.15 $0.07 –
Cash & equivalents $34.81M $100.98M –
Total debt $208.84M $214.62M –
Shares (diluted) 12.08M 19.06M 3.90M
Enterprise value -$81.25M -$143.47M $132.96M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSTHOFRPHOZ
P/E 6.5x 261.1x –
P/FCF -1.3x – –
P/Operating cash flow -6.5x – –
P/S 1.0x 8.2x –
P/B 0.3x 0.8x –
P/Tangible book 0.3x 0.8x –
EV/EBITDA -3.1x 26.6x –
EV/EBIT -2.9x 76.6x –
EV/Revenue 2.8x 10.8x –
EV/FCF -3.8x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -19.0x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.24 -8.03 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSTHOFRPHOZ
Revenue growth (1Y) -17.7% 3.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.7% 3.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 184.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 32.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 36.8% -38.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% -15.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 106.7% -75.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.4% -33.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 126.5% -74.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.6% -32.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.9% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -39.0% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSTHOFRPHOZ
Gross margin 16.0% – –
EBITDA margin -91.4% 40.7% –
Operating margin -97.0% 14.1% –
Pretax margin -98.0% 24.5% –
Net margin 14.8% 3.1% –
FCF margin -73.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin -14.8% – –
Return on equity 1.5% 0.2% –
Return on assets 0.8% 0.1% –
Return on invested capital – 0.9% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.5x – –
Stock comp / revenue – 6.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSTHOFRPHOZ
Debt / assets 41.1% 28.2% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.0x 6.4x –
Debt / FCF -3.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 44.3% 40.3% –
Equity / assets 55.7% 59.7% –
Interest coverage -4.4x 2.1x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSTHOFRPHOZ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 10.8% – –
Shareholder yield 10.8% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSTHOFRPHOZ

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSTHOFRPHOZ
Held by institutions 66.4% 47.8% 31.8%
Institutions holding 81 109 45
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +3.0% -6.0%
Institutions buying 31 56 8
Institutions selling 23 30 13
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.87 0.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

STHOFRPHOZ
STHO 1.00 0.30 0.07
FRPH 0.30 1.00 0.02
OZ 0.07 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, STHO, FRPH and OZ?

Frp Holdings (FRPH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Star Holdings (STHO) $90.61M, Frp Holdings (FRPH) $352.15M, Belpointe PREP (OZ) $132.96M.

Which stock is cheaper, STHO, FRPH and OZ?

Star Holdings (STHO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Star Holdings (STHO) 6.5x, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 258.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Frp Holdings (FRPH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Star Holdings (STHO) -17.7%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) +3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Star Holdings (STHO) has the highest net margin (Star Holdings (STHO) 14.8%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Star Holdings (STHO) returned the most: Star Holdings (STHO) -4.1%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) -23.9%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -46.0%. Over five years, Frp Holdings (FRPH) compounded fastest (Frp Holdings (FRPH) -8.5%/yr, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -19.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Frp Holdings (FRPH) has been the steadiest (Star Holdings (STHO) 30.7%, Frp Holdings (FRPH) 25.8%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) 32.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, STHO, FRPH and OZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Star Holdings (STHO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.