ST vs TEL vs APH Stock Comparison

Sensata Technologies Holding, TE Connectivity and Amphenol Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TEL TE Connectivity plc
$213.88 -2.2% 1M -9.2% 1Y
Market cap
$65.44B
P/E
21.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.32B
Div. yield
0.01%
Electrical Equipment Industrials
5 wins
APH Amphenol Corp /De/
$75.28 -10.5% 1M -43.7% 1Y
Market cap
$192.89B
P/E
37.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.01B
Div. yield
0.01%
Electrical Equipment Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Amphenol leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Amphenol 5, TE Connectivity 5, Sensata Technologies Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSTTELAPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.13B $65.44B $192.89B APH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 68.2x 21.7x 37.5x TEL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.3x 20.0x 28.8x ST
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.8% +16.5% +54.2% APH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.4% 15.6% 17.7% APH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.6% 16.2% 16.5% APH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 0.9x 1.5x TEL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% TEL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.6% -9.2% -43.7% ST
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.8%/yr +8.4%/yr +14.7%/yr APH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.7% 35.9% 85.6% TEL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 76/100 64/100 TEL

Percentile Scorecard

STTELAPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSTTELAPH
Valuation 77 #47 of 203 60 #81 of 203 19 #164 of 203
Growth 31 #130 of 187 86 #28 of 187 97 #7 of 187
Profitability 47 #98 of 185 93 #14 of 185 98 #5 of 185
Financial Health 35 #142 of 219 66 #76 of 219 42 #127 of 219
Shareholder Returns 47 #81 of 153 74 #41 of 153 66 #53 of 153
Overall 48 76 64
  • ST ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TEL ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • APH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSTTELAPHSPY
1 month -3.6%-2.2%-10.5% -0.8%
3 months -12.3%+3.0%-49.6% +3.5%
6 months -3.7%+2.1%-49.4% +7.0%
Year to date +22.2%-6.0%-44.3% +12.2%
1 year +27.6%-9.2%-43.7% +13.0%
3 years +18.6%+85.2%+89.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.9%+22.8%+23.8% +23.1%
5 years -25.7%+49.7%+98.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -5.8%+8.4%+14.7% +11.0%
10 years +9.0%+240.6%+359.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +0.9%+13.0%+16.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSTTELAPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.7%35.9%85.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.8%39.2%114.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.921.621.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.70-0.26-0.51 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.8%-35.2%-58.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.0%-14.1%-57.3% -1.8%
52-week high $53.55$249.00$176.32 $779.14
52-week low $28.53$195.84$73.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSTTELAPH
P/E now vs peer median 65.8xmedian 26.0x 20.6xmedian 26.0x 36.0xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.9x 3.2xmedian 1.9x 6.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 14.0x 13.8xmedian 14.0x 21.8xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 21.4x 18.7xmedian 21.4x 39.4xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.2x 4.7xmedian 2.2x 11.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.74median 1.26 1.25median 1.26 0.96median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSTTELAPH
Revenue $3.78B $19.32B $29.01B
Gross profit $1.11B $6.98B $11.17B
Operating income $284.24M $3.81B $7.84B
Net income $89.91M $3.02B $5.19B
Free cash flow $579.20M $3.32B $4.71B
R&D $128.20M $919.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.61 $10.29 $1.99
Cash & equivalents $403.30M $1.24B $4.73B
Total debt $11.62B $5.63B $18.81B
Shares (diluted) 146.70M 293.00M 2.58B
Enterprise value $3.73B $60.58B $187.47B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSTTELAPH
P/E 65.8x 20.6x 36.0x
P/FCF 10.2x 18.7x 39.4x
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x 14.0x 31.6x
P/S 1.6x 3.2x 6.4x
P/B 2.0x 4.7x 11.9x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 5.5x 18.0x
EV/EBITDA 15.0x 13.8x 21.8x
EV/EBIT 28.0x 17.4x 25.4x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 3.4x 6.9x
EV/FCF 13.7x 20.0x 42.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.5x 15.0x 33.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.74 1.25 0.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSTTELAPH
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.8% 16.5% 54.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.7% 5.7% 32.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.5% 20.3% 70.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -5.6% 10.9% 40.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 110.8% 29.5% 86.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -24.9% 17.9% 45.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -19.3% 107.3% 61.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -38.6% 13.4% 39.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -19.4% 110.8% 59.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -37.8% 16.5% 37.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 23.5% 17.5% 57.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 14.6% 35.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.0% 15.0% 67.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.0% 14.9% 34.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSTTELAPH
Gross margin 29.5% 36.1% 38.5%
EBITDA margin 14.0% 24.9% 31.5%
Operating margin 7.5% 19.7% 27.0%
Pretax margin 4.6% 19.5% 25.2%
Net margin 2.4% 15.6% 17.7%
FCF margin 15.3% 17.2% 16.2%
Operating cash flow margin 18.4% 22.9% 20.2%
Return on equity 3.1% 22.8% 34.9%
Return on assets 1.3% 11.7% 11.9%
Return on invested capital 2.6% 16.2% 16.5%
Return on capital employed 4.8% 18.0% 23.0%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 7.7x 1.5x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.9% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSTTELAPH
Debt / assets 36.9% 21.6% 42.0%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.4x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 0.9x 1.5x
Debt / FCF 4.2x 1.7x 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 55.1% 49.2% 65.2%
Equity / assets 44.9% 50.8% 34.8%
Interest coverage 2.0x 31.3x 12.4x
Current ratio 2.3x 1.9x 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.1x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.3x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 2.41 5.09 5.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSTTELAPH
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.4% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 0.4% 2.6% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 1.6% 4.0% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 28.2% 19.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 25.7% 21.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.8% 39.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 5.8% 27.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSTTELAPH
Forward P/E 11.3xFY2026 20.0xFY2026 28.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.60FY2026 $10.67FY2026 $2.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.3%FY2026 +21.8%FY2026 +56.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.7% +15.1% +35.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.79BFY2026 $20.84BFY2026 $33.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.3%FY2026 +20.7%FY2026 +44.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.1% +10.3% +33.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSTTELAPH
Held by institutions 100.0% 94.1% 96.0%
Institutions holding 467 1,281 2,330
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% +3.0% +2.6%
Institutions buying 265 608 1,360
Institutions selling 149 451 773
Buyers to sellers 1.78 1.35 1.76

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

STTELAPH
ST 1.00 0.57 0.18
TEL 0.57 1.00 0.42
APH 0.18 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ST, TEL and APH?

Amphenol (APH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) $6.13B, TE Connectivity (TEL) $65.44B, Amphenol (APH) $192.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, ST, TEL and APH?

TE Connectivity (TEL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 68.2x, TE Connectivity (TEL) 21.7x, Amphenol (APH) 37.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) is cheapest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 11.3x, TE Connectivity (TEL) 20.0x, Amphenol (APH) 28.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Amphenol (APH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +0.8%, TE Connectivity (TEL) +16.5%, Amphenol (APH) +54.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphenol (APH) has the highest net margin (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 2.4%, TE Connectivity (TEL) 15.6%, Amphenol (APH) 17.7%). On return on invested capital, Amphenol (APH) leads (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 2.6%, TE Connectivity (TEL) 16.2%, Amphenol (APH) 16.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) returned the most: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +27.6%, TE Connectivity (TEL) -9.2%, Amphenol (APH) -43.7%. Over five years, Amphenol (APH) compounded fastest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) -5.8%/yr, TE Connectivity (TEL) +8.4%/yr, Amphenol (APH) +14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

TE Connectivity (TEL) has the highest dividend yield: Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 0.00%, TE Connectivity (TEL) 0.01%, Amphenol (APH) 0.01%. Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TE Connectivity (TEL) has been the steadiest (Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 39.7%, TE Connectivity (TEL) 35.9%, Amphenol (APH) 85.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ST, TEL and APH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amphenol (APH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.