SSGC vs WIMI vs EVLV Stock Comparison

SafeSpace Global, WiMi Hologram Cloud and Evolv Technologies Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.06 -25.0% 1M -82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Evolv Technologies Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Evolv Technologies Holdings 7). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSSGCWIMIEVLVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.32M $3.45M $848.29M EVLV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.6x — -162.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 0.2x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.3% — +41.7% EVLV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14,125.2% — -3.0% EVLV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -23.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -82.4% -87.2% -43.2% EVLV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr -58.9%/yr -3.5%/yr EVLV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 143.0% 70.6% 51.2% EVLV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 — 54/100 EVLV

Percentile Scorecard

SSGCWIMIEVLV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSSGCWIMIEVLV
Valuation 1 #123 of 124 – 56 #55 of 124
Growth 5 #108 of 113 – 99 #2 of 113
Profitability 3 #106 of 109 – 51 #54 of 109
Financial Health 69 #40 of 127 79 #27 of 127 31 #88 of 127
Shareholder Returns – – 33 #44 of 65
Overall 19 – 54
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • WIMI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • EVLV ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSSGCWIMIEVLVSPY
1 month -25.0%-35.4%-4.4% -0.2%
3 months -40.0%-55.3%-18.2% +3.9%
6 months -45.5%-70.2%-32.5% +8.2%
Year to date -72.7%-78.5%-36.0% +12.9%
1 year -82.4%-87.2%-43.2% +12.3%
3 years -40.0%-91.5%+19.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -15.7%-56.1%+6.0% +23.3%
5 years -66.7%-98.8%-16.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.7%-58.9%-3.5% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureSSGCWIMIEVLVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 143.0%70.6%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 175.4%74.0%54.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.362.161.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-1.23-0.84 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.8%-99.1%-77.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -82.4%-87.2%-43.8% -1.2%
52-week high $0.34$3.98$8.15 $779.14
52-week low $0.06$0.51$4.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSSGCWIMIEVLV
P/E now vs peer median -1.5xmedian 38.6x —median 38.6x -158.0xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 212.1xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x 4.8xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x -97.0xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 29.4x —median 29.4x -2,327xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 3.3x 0.0xmedian 3.3x 7.0xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 1.28 —median 1.28 -2.30median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSSGCWIMIEVLV
Revenue $53.72K – $171.44M
Gross profit $25.36K – $85.49M
Operating income -$7.80M – -$35.60M
Net income -$7.59M – -$5.22M
Free cash flow -$4.52M – -$356.00K
R&D – – $22.69M
EPS (diluted) $-0.04 – $-0.03
Cash & equivalents $1.74M $198.36M $52.70M
Total debt – $108.20M $28.74M
Shares (diluted) 189.55M 9.71M 180.10M
Enterprise value -$6.79M -$1.65B $599.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSSGCWIMIEVLV
P/E -1.5x – -158.0x
P/FCF -2.5x – -2,327x
P/Operating cash flow -2.1x – 29.7x
P/S 212.1x – 4.8x
P/B 5.8x 0.0x 7.0x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 0.0x 7.0x
EV/EBITDA -1.9x – -97.0x
EV/EBIT -1.2x – -22.3x
EV/Revenue 179.7x – 4.6x
EV/FCF -2.1x – -2,231x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x – 28.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 – -2.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSSGCWIMIEVLV
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.3% – 41.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 31.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 25.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 95.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -107.0% – 49.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -100.2% – 29.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -125.5% – 94.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -82.7% – 66.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -96.6% – 94.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -12.0% – 68.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -203.2% – 334.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -260.2% – 42.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -148.0% – 98.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% – 83.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSSGCWIMIEVLV
Gross margin 47.2% – 49.9%
EBITDA margin -9,232% – -4.8%
Operating margin -14,518% – -20.8%
Pretax margin -14,283% – -3.1%
Net margin -14,125% – -3.0%
FCF margin -8,418% – -0.2%
Operating cash flow margin -10,294% – 16.2%
Return on equity -210.5% – -4.4%
Return on assets -177.3% – -1.7%
Return on invested capital – – -23.8%
Return on capital employed -198.3% – -20.2%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x – -5.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1,842% – 13.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSSGCWIMIEVLV
Debt / assets – 5.5% 9.5%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.1x
Debt / FCF – – -80.7x
Liabilities / assets 34.8% 28.1% 60.6%
Equity / assets 65.2% 71.9% 39.4%
Interest coverage – – -9.7x
Current ratio 5.4x 3.6x 1.2x
Quick ratio 4.4x 3.4x 0.8x
Cash ratio 4.4x 3.4x 0.5x
Altman Z-score -13.96 – 1.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSSGCWIMIEVLV
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -0.7%
Shareholder yield – – -0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSSGCWIMIEVLV
Forward P/E – 0.2xFY2023 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.31FY2023 $-0.09FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $270.18MFY2023 $193.69MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +32.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +19.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSSGCWIMIEVLV
Held by institutions – – 67.2%
Institutions holding – – 256
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +2.2%
Institutions buying – – 132
Institutions selling – – 68
Buyers to sellers – – 1.94

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SSGCWIMIEVLV
SSGC 1.00 0.02 0.04
WIMI 0.02 1.00 0.29
EVLV 0.04 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SSGC, WIMI and EVLV?

Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) is the largest by market capitalisation: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.32M, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) $3.45M, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) $848.29M.

Which company is growing faster?

Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) +41.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) has the highest net margin (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) -3.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) returned the most: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -82.4%, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) -87.2%, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) -43.2%. Over five years, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) compounded fastest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -19.7%/yr, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) -58.9%/yr, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) -3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) has been the steadiest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 143.0%, WiMi Hologram Cloud (WIMI) 70.6%, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SSGC, WIMI and EVLV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Evolv Technologies Holdings (EVLV) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.