SSGC vs ITMSF vs AISP Stock Comparison

SafeSpace Global, Intermap Technologies and Airship AI Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.06 -25.0% 1M -82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Airship AI Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Airship AI Holdings 6, Intermap Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSSGCITMSFAISPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.32M $34.00M $78.00M AISP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.6x -3.5x 3.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.3% -66.2% +32.2% AISP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14,125.2% -147.8% 144.6% AISP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -82.4% -73.4% -53.8% AISP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr -4.2%/yr -25.2%/yr ITMSF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 143.0% 84.5% 78.7% AISP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 26/100 46/100 AISP

Percentile Scorecard

SSGCITMSFAISP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSSGCITMSFAISP
Valuation 1 #123 of 124 19 #101 of 124 59 #51 of 124
Growth 5 #108 of 113 1 #112 of 113 84 #19 of 113
Profitability 3 #106 of 109 20 #87 of 109 44 #62 of 109
Financial Health 69 #40 of 127 64 #47 of 127 35 #83 of 127
Shareholder Returns – – 9 #59 of 65
Overall 19 26 46
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSSGCITMSFAISPSPY
1 month -25.0%-14.1%+25.8% -0.2%
3 months -40.0%-25.7%+18.7% +3.9%
6 months -45.5%-61.5%+1.8% +8.2%
Year to date -72.7%-59.6%-20.8% +12.9%
1 year -82.4%-73.4%-53.8% +12.3%
3 years -40.0%+37.5%-78.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -15.7%+11.2%-40.1% +23.3%
5 years -66.7%-19.1%-76.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.7%-4.2%-25.2% +10.9%
10 years —-21.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-2.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSSGCITMSFAISPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 143.0%84.5%78.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 175.4%99.0%72.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.360.862.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.87-0.68 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.8%-78.5%-87.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -82.4%-73.7%-53.8% -1.2%
52-week high $0.34$2.09$4.96 $779.14
52-week low $0.06$0.54$1.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSSGCITMSFAISP
P/E now vs peer median -1.5xmedian 38.6x -3.5xmedian 38.6x 3.0xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 212.1xmedian 4.4x 6.0xmedian 4.4x 4.3xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 34.5x -2.8xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 29.4x -4.6xmedian 29.4x -22.5xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 3.3x 2.3xmedian 3.3x -9.1xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 1.28 —median 1.28 0.04median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSSGCITMSFAISP
Revenue $53.72K $6.65M $18.15M
Gross profit $25.36K – $10.19M
Operating income -$7.80M -$9.75M -$6.55M
Net income -$7.59M -$9.82M $26.24M
Free cash flow -$4.52M -$8.57M -$3.51M
R&D – – $3.31M
EPS (diluted) $-0.04 $-0.16 $0.76
Cash & equivalents $1.74M $16.18M $12.37M
Total debt – $1.65M –
Shares (diluted) 189.55M 61.80M 34.44M
Enterprise value -$6.79M -$49.78M $35.56M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSSGCITMSFAISP
P/E -1.5x -3.5x 3.0x
P/FCF -2.5x -4.6x -22.5x
P/Operating cash flow -2.1x -5.6x -22.5x
P/S 212.1x 6.0x 4.3x
P/B 5.8x 2.3x -9.1x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 2.4x -9.1x
EV/EBITDA -1.9x -2.8x –
EV/EBIT -1.2x -2.5x -10.2x
EV/Revenue 179.7x 3.6x 3.7x
EV/FCF -2.1x -2.8x -19.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x -3.4x -19.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 – 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSSGCITMSFAISP
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.3% -66.2% 32.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 42.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -107.0% -1,317% 3.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -100.2% – 2.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -125.5% -1,584% 159.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -82.7% – 62.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -96.6% -1,313% 155.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -12.0% – 68.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -203.2% -365.1% 44.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -260.2% – -2.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -148.0% -216.7% 44.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% – -2.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSSGCITMSFAISP
Gross margin 47.2% – 56.2%
EBITDA margin -9,232% -128.3% –
Operating margin -14,518% -146.6% -36.1%
Pretax margin -14,283% -152.3% -36.1%
Net margin -14,125% -147.8% 144.6%
FCF margin -8,418% -129.0% -19.3%
Operating cash flow margin -10,294% -107.7% -19.3%
Return on equity -210.5% -51.9% –
Return on assets -177.3% -36.5% -35.5%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -198.3% -45.5% -50.0%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 0.7x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1,842% 9.6% 13.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSSGCITMSFAISP
Debt / assets – 1.6% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x –
Debt / FCF – 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 34.8% 32.0% 148.6%
Equity / assets 65.2% 68.0% -48.6%
Interest coverage – -180.5x –
Current ratio 5.4x 3.3x 3.2x
Quick ratio 4.4x 3.2x 3.0x
Cash ratio 4.4x 2.9x 2.3x
Altman Z-score -13.96 -11.00 -1.46

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSSGCITMSFAISP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -12.2%
Shareholder yield – – -12.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSSGCITMSFAISP
Forward P/E – 27.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.02FY2026 $-0.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -107.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +350.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $32.39MFY2026 $28.14MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +205.6%FY2026 +83.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +29.0% +36.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSSGCITMSFAISP
Held by institutions – – 14.5%
Institutions holding – – 79
Change in shares held, QoQ – – -29.3%
Institutions buying – – 41
Institutions selling – – 27
Buyers to sellers – – 1.52

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SSGCITMSFAISP
SSGC 1.00 -0.04 0.07
ITMSF -0.04 1.00 0.20
AISP 0.07 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SSGC, ITMSF and AISP?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) is the largest by market capitalisation: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.32M, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $34.00M, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $78.00M.

Which company is growing faster?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has the highest net margin (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Airship AI Holdings (AISP) returned the most: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -82.4%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -73.4%, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -53.8%. Over five years, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) compounded fastest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -19.7%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.2%/yr, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -25.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has been the steadiest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 143.0%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.5%, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SSGC, ITMSF and AISP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.