SSGC vs HOLO vs PL Stock Comparison

SafeSpace Global, MicroCloud Hologram and Planet Labs PBC Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.07 -22.2% 1M -80.6% 1Y
Market cap
$12.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
PL Planet Labs PBC
$13.77 -21.0% 1M +1.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.22B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$378.28M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Planet Labs PBC leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Planet Labs PBC 6, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSSGCHOLOPLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.32M $15.68M $5.22B PL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.6x — -14.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.3% — +44.1% PL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14,125.2% — -95.1% PL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -80.6% -74.0% +1.2% PL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.3%/yr -89.2%/yr +6.7%/yr PL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 142.3% 67.2% 91.7% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 — 36/100 PL

Percentile Scorecard

SSGCHOLOPL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSSGCHOLOPL
Valuation 1 #123 of 124 – 35 #81 of 124
Growth 5 #108 of 113 – 46 #62 of 113
Profitability 3 #107 of 110 – 38 #69 of 110
Financial Health 70 #40 of 129 99 #2 of 129 45 #71 of 129
Shareholder Returns – – 15 #57 of 67
Overall 19 – 36
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PL ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSSGCHOLOPLSPY
1 month -22.2%-30.5%-21.0% -0.8%
3 months -30.0%-29.7%-34.4% +3.5%
6 months -41.7%-32.9%-61.2% +7.0%
Year to date -68.2%-56.1%-30.2% +12.2%
1 year -80.6%-74.0%+1.2% +13.0%
3 years -30.0%-100.0%+565.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -11.2%-93.7%+88.2% +23.1%
5 years -58.8%-100.0%+38.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -16.3%-89.2%+6.7% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureSSGCHOLOPLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 142.3%67.2%91.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 172.4%74.3%82.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.342.432.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.57-1.100.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.1%-100.0%-85.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -80.6%-74.6%-73.2% -1.8%
52-week high $0.36$4.57$51.40 $779.14
52-week low $0.07$1.16$11.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSSGCHOLOPL
P/E now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 38.1x —median 38.1x -13.8xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 247.4xmedian 4.3x —median 4.3x 13.2xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 35.4x —median 35.4x -68.3xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.9xmedian 27.1x —median 27.1x 203.0xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 3.4x 0.0xmedian 3.4x 8.9xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.15median 1.27 —median 1.27 0.62median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSSGCHOLOPL
Revenue $53.72K – $378.28M
Gross profit $25.36K – $209.65M
Operating income -$7.80M – -$102.74M
Net income -$7.59M – -$359.87M
Free cash flow -$4.52M – $24.67M
R&D – – $128.10M
EPS (diluted) $-0.04 – $-1.00
Cash & equivalents $1.74M $110.42M $415.13M
Total debt – $1.87M –
Shares (diluted) 189.55M 13.18M 359.59M
Enterprise value -$6.79M -$2.17B $2.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSSGCHOLOPL
P/E -1.7x – -13.8x
P/FCF -2.9x – 203.0x
P/Operating cash flow -2.4x – 42.6x
P/S 247.4x – 13.2x
P/B 6.8x 0.0x 8.9x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 0.0x 9.3x
EV/EBITDA -2.3x – -68.3x
EV/EBIT -1.5x – -40.3x
EV/Revenue 215.1x – 11.0x
EV/FCF -2.6x – 167.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -2.1x – 35.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.15 – 0.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSSGCHOLOPL
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.3% – 44.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 21.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 35.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 24.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -107.0% – -24.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -100.2% – 16.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -125.5% – -297.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -82.7% – -33.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -96.6% – -236.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -12.0% – -22.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -203.2% – 41.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -260.2% – 55.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -148.0% – -30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% – 31.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSSGCHOLOPL
Gross margin 47.2% – 55.4%
EBITDA margin -9,232% – -16.0%
Operating margin -14,518% – -27.2%
Pretax margin -14,283% – -93.8%
Net margin -14,125% – -95.1%
FCF margin -8,418% – 6.5%
Operating cash flow margin -10,294% – 31.1%
Return on equity -210.5% – -71.4%
Return on assets -177.3% – -26.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -198.3% – -10.4%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x – -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1,842% – 16.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSSGCHOLOPL
Debt / assets – 0.0% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 34.8% 2.9% 60.6%
Equity / assets 65.2% 97.1% 39.4%
Interest coverage – – -18.7x
Current ratio 5.4x 34.6x 2.8x
Quick ratio 4.4x 107.3x 2.6x
Cash ratio 4.4x 107.0x 2.5x
Altman Z-score -12.87 – 2.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSSGCHOLOPL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -5.3%
Shareholder yield – – -5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSSGCHOLOPL
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.05FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $413.71MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +34.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +41.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSSGCHOLOPL
Held by institutions – 3.0% 74.2%
Institutions holding – 16 480
Change in shares held, QoQ – +135.7% +6.1%
Institutions buying – 11 270
Institutions selling – 0 161
Buyers to sellers – – 1.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SSGCHOLOPL
SSGC 1.00 -0.02 0.02
HOLO -0.02 1.00 0.32
PL 0.02 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SSGC, HOLO and PL?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) is the largest by market capitalisation: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.32M, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.68M, Planet Labs PBC (PL) $5.22B.

Which company is growing faster?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +44.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) has the highest net margin (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) -95.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Planet Labs PBC (PL) returned the most: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -80.6%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -74.0%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +1.2%. Over five years, Planet Labs PBC (PL) compounded fastest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -16.3%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr, Planet Labs PBC (PL) +6.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 142.3%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.2%, Planet Labs PBC (PL) 91.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SSGC, HOLO and PL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Planet Labs PBC (PL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.