SSGC vs CXT vs ZBRA Stock Comparison

SafeSpace Global, Crane NXT and Zebra Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.06 -25.0% 1M -82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
CXT Crane NXT, Co.
$58.43 +22.4% 1M -11.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.32B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$381.67 +3.1% 1M +22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$18.26B
P/E
33.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Zebra Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Zebra Technologies 6, Crane NXT 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSSGCCXTZBRALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.32M $3.32B $18.26B ZBRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.6x 23.7x 33.9x CXT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.7x 16.9x CXT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.3% +17.3% +12.7% CXT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14,125.2% 7.8% 9.2% ZBRA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.4% 10.6% ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.2x 2.4x ZBRA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -82.4% -11.0% +22.9% ZBRA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr +10.6%/yr -6.4%/yr CXT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 143.0% 38.9% 47.2% CXT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 44/100 62/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

SSGCCXTZBRA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSSGCCXTZBRA
Valuation 1 #123 of 124 68 #65 of 203 68 #37 of 112
Growth 5 #108 of 113 49 #97 of 188 49 #56 of 109
Profitability 3 #106 of 109 61 #72 of 183 85 #17 of 104
Financial Health 69 #40 of 127 18 #179 of 217 17 #97 of 116
Shareholder Returns – 26 #113 of 153 94 #6 of 81
Overall 19 44 62
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CXT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ZBRA ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSSGCCXTZBRASPY
1 month -25.0%+22.4%+3.1% -0.2%
3 months -40.0%+7.2%+34.2% +3.9%
6 months -45.5%+31.9%+74.1% +8.2%
Year to date -72.7%+24.1%+57.2% +12.9%
1 year -82.4%-11.0%+22.9% +12.3%
3 years -40.0%+14.8%+84.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -15.7%+4.7%+22.6% +23.3%
5 years -66.7%+65.7%-28.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.7%+10.6%-6.4% +10.9%
10 years —+147.8%+475.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+9.5%+19.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSSGCCXTZBRASPY
Volatility, 1Y 143.0%38.9%47.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 175.4%41.1%41.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.361.221.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.280.48 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.8%-47.6%-67.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -82.4%-11.0%-2.4% -1.2%
52-week high $0.34$65.65$391.00 $779.14
52-week low $0.06$36.13$199.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSSGCCXTZBRA
P/E now vs peer median -1.5xmedian 38.6x 23.9xmedian 25.2x 33.8xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 212.1xmedian 4.4x 1.9xmedian 1.9x 3.1xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 34.5x 12.1xmedian 14.0x 19.3xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 29.4x 15.0xmedian 21.7x 20.0xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 3.3x 2.7xmedian 2.3x 5.3xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 1.28 -2.29median 1.32 -8.94median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSSGCCXTZBRA
Revenue $53.72K $1.80B $5.85B
Gross profit $25.36K $759.30M $2.90B
Operating income -$7.80M $252.60M $858.00M
Net income -$7.59M $141.40M $539.00M
Free cash flow -$4.52M $224.00M $904.00M
R&D – – $622.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.04 $2.42 $11.20
Cash & equivalents $1.74M $231.40M $157.00M
Total debt – $1.45B $2.77B
Shares (diluted) 189.55M 58.00M 48.13M
Enterprise value -$6.79M $2.44B $16.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTZBRA
P/E -1.5x 23.9x 33.8x
P/FCF -2.5x 15.0x 20.0x
P/Operating cash flow -2.1x 12.4x 18.4x
P/S 212.1x 1.9x 3.1x
P/B 5.8x 2.7x 5.3x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 6.5x 6.7x
EV/EBITDA -1.9x 12.1x 19.3x
EV/EBIT -1.2x 18.2x 24.1x
EV/Revenue 179.7x 2.5x 3.5x
EV/FCF -2.1x 20.5x 22.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x 17.0x 21.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 -2.29 -8.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTZBRA
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.3% 17.3% 12.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 14.9% 14.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.6% 4.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -107.0% 9.4% 8.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -100.2% -4.0% -0.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -125.5% -6.6% -1.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -82.7% -9.9% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -96.6% -7.4% 4.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -12.0% -10.5% -3.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -203.2% 41.3% 5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -260.2% -1.1% 63.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -148.0% 52.0% 6.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% -4.6% 83.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTZBRA
Gross margin 47.2% 42.1% 49.6%
EBITDA margin -9,232% 21.0% 18.3%
Operating margin -14,518% 14.0% 14.7%
Pretax margin -14,283% 9.8% 12.1%
Net margin -14,125% 7.8% 9.2%
FCF margin -8,418% 12.4% 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin -10,294% 15.0% 16.7%
Return on equity -210.5% 11.3% 15.6%
Return on assets -177.3% 3.9% 6.4%
Return on invested capital – 7.4% 10.6%
Return on capital employed -198.3% 8.6% 19.1%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.9x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1,842% 1.4% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTZBRA
Debt / assets – 40.4% 32.0%
Debt / equity – 1.1x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.2x 2.4x
Debt / FCF – 6.5x 3.1x
Liabilities / assets 34.8% 64.8% 60.2%
Equity / assets 65.2% 35.2% 39.8%
Interest coverage – 3.5x –
Current ratio 5.4x 1.4x 0.5x
Quick ratio 4.4x 0.9x 0.3x
Cash ratio 4.4x 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -13.96 1.85 3.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTZBRA
Dividend yield – 1.2% –
Net buyback yield – -0.7% 5.0%
Shareholder yield – 0.5% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSSGCCXTZBRA
Forward P/E – 12.7xFY2026 16.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.59FY2026 $22.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +13.1%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – 0.0% -4.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.85BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +11.4%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +17.8% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSSGCCXTZBRA
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 359 644
Change in shares held, QoQ – +12.7% +4.5%
Institutions buying – 182 309
Institutions selling – 111 242
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SSGCCXTZBRA
SSGC 1.00 -0.01 0.08
CXT -0.01 1.00 0.28
ZBRA 0.08 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SSGC, CXT and ZBRA?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.32M, Crane NXT (CXT) $3.32B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $18.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, SSGC, CXT and ZBRA?

Crane NXT (CXT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -1.6x, Crane NXT (CXT) 23.7x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 33.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Crane NXT (CXT) is cheapest (Crane NXT (CXT) 12.7x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 16.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Crane NXT (CXT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%, Crane NXT (CXT) +17.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has the highest net margin (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%, Crane NXT (CXT) 7.8%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Crane NXT (CXT) 7.4%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) returned the most: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -82.4%, Crane NXT (CXT) -11.0%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +22.9%. Over five years, Crane NXT (CXT) compounded fastest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -19.7%/yr, Crane NXT (CXT) +10.6%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crane NXT (CXT) has been the steadiest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 143.0%, Crane NXT (CXT) 38.9%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 47.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SSGC, CXT and ZBRA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.