SSGC vs CXT vs ITMSF Stock Comparison

SafeSpace Global, Crane NXT and Intermap Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SSGC SafeSpace Global Corp
$0.07 -22.2% 1M -80.6% 1Y
Market cap
$12.85M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$53.72K
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
CXT Crane NXT, Co.
$57.00 +19.4% 1M -13.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.25B
P/E
23.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Crane NXT leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Crane NXT 8, Intermap Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSSGCCXTITMSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.85M $3.25B $39.84M CXT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.7x 23.2x -3.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.4x 27.5x CXT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -73.3% +17.3% -66.2% CXT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14,125.2% 7.8% -147.8% CXT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.2x 1.8x ITMSF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -80.6% -13.7% -74.8% CXT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.3%/yr +10.3%/yr -4.7%/yr CXT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 142.3% 38.9% 84.7% CXT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 45/100 26/100 CXT

Percentile Scorecard

SSGCCXTITMSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSSGCCXTITMSF
Valuation 1 #123 of 124 70 #61 of 203 19 #101 of 124
Growth 5 #108 of 113 50 #95 of 187 1 #112 of 113
Profitability 3 #107 of 110 62 #71 of 185 20 #88 of 110
Financial Health 70 #40 of 129 17 #181 of 219 64 #47 of 129
Shareholder Returns – 26 #113 of 153 –
Overall 19 45 26
  • SSGC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CXT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSSGCCXTITMSFSPY
1 month -22.2%+19.4%-14.1% -0.8%
3 months -30.0%+5.1%-22.5% +3.5%
6 months -41.7%+28.6%-62.8% +7.0%
Year to date -68.2%+21.1%-59.6% +12.2%
1 year -80.6%-13.7%-74.8% +13.0%
3 years -30.0%+12.0%+37.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -11.2%+3.9%+11.2% +23.1%
5 years -58.8%+63.5%-21.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -16.3%+10.3%-4.7% +11.0%
10 years —+143.4%-21.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.3%-2.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSSGCCXTITMSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 142.3%38.9%84.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 172.4%41.1%99.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.341.210.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.57-0.35-0.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.1%-47.6%-78.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -80.6%-13.2%-73.7% -1.8%
52-week high $0.36$65.65$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.07$36.13$0.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSSGCCXTITMSF
P/E now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 38.1x 23.4xmedian 26.0x -3.5xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 247.4xmedian 4.3x 1.8xmedian 1.9x 6.0xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 35.4x 11.9xmedian 14.0x -2.8xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.9xmedian 27.1x 14.6xmedian 21.4x -4.6xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 3.4x 2.6xmedian 2.2x 2.3xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.15median 1.27 -2.23median 1.26 —median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSSGCCXTITMSF
Revenue $53.72K $1.80B $6.65M
Gross profit $25.36K $759.30M –
Operating income -$7.80M $252.60M -$9.75M
Net income -$7.59M $141.40M -$9.82M
Free cash flow -$4.52M $224.00M -$8.57M
EPS (diluted) $-0.04 $2.42 $-0.16
Cash & equivalents $1.74M $231.40M $16.18M
Total debt – $1.45B $1.65M
Shares (diluted) 189.55M 58.00M 61.80M
Enterprise value -$6.26M $2.38B -$43.93M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTITMSF
P/E -1.7x 23.4x -3.5x
P/FCF -2.9x 14.6x -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow -2.4x 12.1x -5.6x
P/S 247.4x 1.8x 6.0x
P/B 6.8x 2.6x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 6.3x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA -2.3x 11.9x -2.8x
EV/EBIT -1.5x 17.8x -2.5x
EV/Revenue 215.1x 2.5x 3.6x
EV/FCF -2.6x 20.1x -2.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -2.1x 16.6x -3.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.15 -2.23 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTITMSF
Revenue growth (1Y) -73.3% 17.3% -66.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 14.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -107.0% 9.4% -1,317%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -100.2% -4.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -125.5% -6.6% -1,584%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -82.7% -9.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -96.6% -7.4% -1,313%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -12.0% -10.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -203.2% 41.3% -365.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -260.2% -1.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -148.0% 52.0% -216.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% -4.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTITMSF
Gross margin 47.2% 42.1% –
EBITDA margin -9,232% 21.0% -128.3%
Operating margin -14,518% 14.0% -146.6%
Pretax margin -14,283% 9.8% -152.3%
Net margin -14,125% 7.8% -147.8%
FCF margin -8,418% 12.4% -129.0%
Operating cash flow margin -10,294% 15.0% -107.7%
Return on equity -210.5% 11.3% -51.9%
Return on assets -177.3% 3.9% -36.5%
Return on invested capital – 7.4% –
Return on capital employed -198.3% 8.6% -45.5%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.9x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1,842% 1.4% 9.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTITMSF
Debt / assets – 40.4% 1.6%
Debt / equity – 1.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.2x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 6.5x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 34.8% 64.8% 32.0%
Equity / assets 65.2% 35.2% 68.0%
Interest coverage – 3.5x -180.5x
Current ratio 5.4x 1.4x 3.3x
Quick ratio 4.4x 0.9x 3.2x
Cash ratio 4.4x 0.3x 2.9x
Altman Z-score -12.87 1.83 -11.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSSGCCXTITMSF
Dividend yield – 1.2% –
Net buyback yield – -0.7% –
Shareholder yield – 0.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSSGCCXTITMSF
Forward P/E – 12.4xFY2026 27.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.59FY2026 $0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +13.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – 0.0% +350.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.85BFY2026 $32.39MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +11.4%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +17.8% +29.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSSGCCXTITMSF
Held by institutions – 100.0% –
Institutions holding – 359 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +12.7% –
Institutions buying – 182 –
Institutions selling – 111 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SSGCCXTITMSF
SSGC 1.00 0.00 -0.04
CXT 0.00 1.00 0.06
ITMSF -0.04 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SSGC, CXT and ITMSF?

Crane NXT (CXT) is the largest by market capitalisation: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) $12.85M, Crane NXT (CXT) $3.25B, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $39.84M.

Which company is growing faster?

Crane NXT (CXT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -73.3%, Crane NXT (CXT) +17.3%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Crane NXT (CXT) has the highest net margin (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -14,125.2%, Crane NXT (CXT) 7.8%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Crane NXT (CXT) returned the most: SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -80.6%, Crane NXT (CXT) -13.7%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -74.8%. Over five years, Crane NXT (CXT) compounded fastest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) -16.3%/yr, Crane NXT (CXT) +10.3%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crane NXT (CXT) has been the steadiest (SafeSpace Global (SSGC) 142.3%, Crane NXT (CXT) 38.9%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SSGC, CXT and ITMSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Crane NXT (CXT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.