SRAD vs BR vs NTAP Stock Comparison

Sportradar Group AG, Broadridge Financial Solutions and NetApp Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.60 -4.8% 1M -53.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.65B
P/E
634.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$222.08 +10.4% 1M +90.4% 1Y
Market cap
$44.64B
P/E
31.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 6, Broadridge Financial Solutions 3, Sportradar Group AG 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSRADBRNTAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.65B $20.57B $44.64B NTAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 634.4x 18.3x 31.5x BR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.5x 17.5x 21.2x BR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.7% +8.5% +12.2% SRAD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% 15.0% 19.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -8.6% 16.7% 36.7% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.8x -0.5x NTAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.4% -22.0% +90.4% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.0%/yr 0.0%/yr +20.3%/yr NTAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.6% 30.6% 44.8% BR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 56/100 56/100 SRAD

Percentile Scorecard

SRADBRNTAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSRADBRNTAP
Valuation 77 #29 of 124 62 #39 of 102 41 #66 of 111
Growth 63 #43 of 113 40 #59 of 98 51 #53 of 108
Profitability 71 #33 of 110 81 #19 of 95 91 #10 of 104
Financial Health 56 #57 of 129 44 #61 of 109 27 #84 of 115
Shareholder Returns 30 #47 of 67 51 #32 of 64 70 #25 of 81
Overall 59 56 56
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • BR ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSRADBRNTAPSPY
1 month -4.8%+10.6%+10.4% -0.8%
3 months -14.2%+18.6%+30.8% +3.5%
6 months -9.5%+15.8%+104.8% +7.0%
Year to date -47.0%-18.9%+107.4% +12.2%
1 year -53.4%-22.0%+90.4% +13.0%
3 years +44.0%+8.2%+209.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +12.9%+2.7%+45.7% +23.1%
5 years -37.5%-0.1%+151.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -9.0%0.0%+20.3% +11.0%
10 years —+180.8%+553.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+10.9%+20.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSRADBRNTAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.6%30.6%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.4%32.8%38.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.031.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.94-0.722.02 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.0%-49.3%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.5%-22.0%-7.1% -1.8%
52-week high $27.11$232.02$239.18 $779.14
52-week low $11.56$135.44$94.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSRADBRNTAP
P/E now vs peer median 655.2xmedian 38.1x 18.7xmedian 28.8x 30.7xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 4.3x 2.8xmedian 2.8x 5.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -14.4xmedian 35.4x 14.6xmedian 17.7x 20.9xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 27.1x 16.1xmedian 15.8x 26.4xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 3.4x 7.3xmedian 3.2x 29.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 22.63median 1.27 0.85median 0.85 3.74median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSRADBRNTAP
Revenue $1.62B $7.48B $7.39B
Gross profit – $2.38B $5.22B
Operating income – $1.30B $1.85B
Net income $19.94M $1.12B $1.42B
Free cash flow $510.26M $1.28B $1.65B
R&D $44.37M – $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $64,328.88 $9.60 $7.09
Cash & equivalents $286.82M $402.90M $1.57B
Total debt $49.28M $3.25B $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 310.00 117.10M 200.00M
Enterprise value $10.94B $19.20B $27.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSRADBRNTAP
P/E 655.2x 18.7x 30.7x
P/FCF 7.7x 16.1x 26.4x
P/Operating cash flow 7.8x 15.3x 22.9x
P/S 2.4x 2.8x 5.9x
P/B 4.4x 7.3x 29.1x
P/Tangible book 4.4x 12.6x 29.9x
EV/EBITDA -14.4x 14.6x 20.9x
EV/EBIT -42.7x 18.1x 23.0x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 3.1x 5.7x
EV/FCF 7.0x 18.4x 25.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.2x 17.5x 22.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 22.63 0.85 3.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSRADBRNTAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.7% 8.5% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.9% 7.2% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 11.2% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% 7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 9.4% 35.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 11.6% 25.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -83.5% 33.9% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.8% 21.3% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -94.7% 35.3% 22.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 21.9% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.0% 14.9% 3.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.5% 17.8% 14.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 15.7% 13.4% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 17.7% 15.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSRADBRNTAP
Gross margin – 31.8% 70.6%
EBITDA margin -15.4% 21.5% 27.5%
Operating margin – 17.4% 25.0%
Pretax margin 1.4% 19.3% 24.7%
Net margin 1.2% 15.0% 19.2%
FCF margin 31.6% 17.1% 22.3%
Operating cash flow margin 31.0% 18.0% 25.7%
Return on equity 2.1% 39.7% 99.6%
Return on assets 0.7% 12.7% 13.1%
Return on invested capital -8.6% 16.7% 36.7%
Return on capital employed -3.5% 17.5% 29.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 25.1x 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 4.2% 1.3% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSRADBRNTAP
Debt / assets 0.4% 36.4% 22.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.1x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.8x -0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.0x 2.5x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 69.5% 68.2% 86.4%
Equity / assets 30.5% 31.8% 13.6%
Interest coverage -0.8x – –
Current ratio 1.0x 1.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.3x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 1.78 4.10 4.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSRADBRNTAP
Dividend yield – 2.2% 0.9%
Net buyback yield -1.0% 2.8% 1.7%
Shareholder yield -1.0% 5.0% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSRADBRNTAP
Forward P/E 48.5xFY2026 17.5xFY2027 21.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.26FY2026 $10.32FY2027 $10.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -27.8%FY2026 +7.5%FY2027 +29.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +100.0% +5.0% +8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.65BFY2026 $7.42BFY2027 $8.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.4%FY2026 -0.9%FY2027 +22.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.8% +3.8% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSRADBRNTAP
Held by institutions 17.8% 92.3% 97.4%
Institutions holding 151 1,014 959
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% -1.2% -1.0%
Institutions buying 88 487 501
Institutions selling 42 398 336
Buyers to sellers 2.10 1.22 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SRADBRNTAP
SRAD 1.00 0.20 0.09
BR 0.20 1.00 0.03
NTAP 0.09 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SRAD, BR and NTAP?

NetApp (NTAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $12.65B, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) $20.57B, NetApp (NTAP) $44.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, SRAD, BR and NTAP?

Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 634.4x, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 18.3x, NetApp (NTAP) 31.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) is cheapest (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 48.5x, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 17.5x, NetApp (NTAP) 21.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) +8.5%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 15.0%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 16.7%, NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -53.4%, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) -22.0%, NetApp (NTAP) +90.4%. Over five years, NetApp (NTAP) compounded fastest (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.0%/yr, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 0.0%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +20.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) has been the steadiest (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.6%, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 30.6%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SRAD, BR and NTAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.