SQM vs SU vs IONR Stock Comparison

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile, Suncor Energy and Ioneer Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SU Suncor Energy Inc
$79.48 +16.5% 1M +99.5% 1Y
Market cap
$94.86B
P/E
7.1x
Revenue (TTM)
-$3.60B
Div. yield
3.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
5 wins
IONR ioneer Ltd
$2.70 -18.4% 1M -48.0% 1Y
Market cap
$180.54M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Suncor Energy leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Suncor Energy 5, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSQMSUIONRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.27B $94.86B $180.54M SU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.7x 7.1x — SU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.1x 8.6x — SQM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +59.0% -108.8% — SQM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 0.5x — SQM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.25% 3.02% — SQM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.0% +99.5% -48.0% SU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.2%/yr +28.3%/yr — SU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.0% 27.5% 79.5% SU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 63/100 — SQM

Percentile Scorecard

SQMSUIONR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSQMSUIONR
Valuation 82 #21 of 114 63 #19 of 49 –
Growth 54 #48 of 102 70 #15 of 48 –
Profitability 73 #23 of 81 69 #15 of 46 –
Financial Health 32 #82 of 120 73 #15 of 52 99 #2 of 120
Shareholder Returns 92 #7 of 73 42 #20 of 34 –
Overall 66 63 –
  • SQM ranked among 128 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SU ranked among 52 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • IONR ranked among 128 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSQMSUIONRSPY
1 month -14.8%+16.5%-18.4% -0.8%
3 months -17.2%+24.2%-16.1% +3.5%
6 months -37.6%+23.3%-34.3% +7.0%
Year to date -17.2%+79.2%-43.7% +12.2%
1 year +25.0%+99.5%-48.0% +13.0%
3 years +11.5%+144.8%-27.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +3.7%+34.8%-10.3% +23.1%
5 years +5.9%+247.2%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +1.2%+28.3%— +11.0%
10 years +94.6%+169.5%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +6.9%+10.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSQMSUIONRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.0%27.5%79.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.9%28.2%76.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.96-0.391.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.533.63-0.60 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.5%-37.3%-87.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.2%0.0%-57.7% -1.8%
52-week high $95.31$79.48$6.39 $779.14
52-week low $44.36$39.51$2.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSQMSUIONR
P/E now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 10.6x 7.1xmedian 14.1x —median 10.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 3.1x -26.4xmedian 2.3x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 5.9x 11.4xmedian 4.9x —median 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.3x 4.8xmedian 8.1x —median 11.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.3x 2.0xmedian 1.5x 0.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.75median 0.17 0.19median 1.20 —median 0.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSQMSUIONR
Revenue $6.73B -$3.60B –
Gross profit $2.83B – –
Operating income $3.11B $1.71B –
Net income $1.39B $8.93B –
Free cash flow – $19.78B –
EPS (diluted) $4.86 $11.22 –
Cash & equivalents $3.38B $5.37B $58.84M
Total debt $19.72B $9.85B –
Shares (diluted) 285.64M 1.22B 60.35M
Enterprise value $5.29B $80.61B $46.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSQMSUIONR
P/E 11.7x 7.1x –
P/FCF – 4.8x –
P/Operating cash flow – 6.0x –
P/S 2.4x -26.4x –
P/B 1.9x 2.0x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 2.0x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 4.8x 11.4x –
EV/EBIT 5.5x 58.2x –
EV/Revenue 2.5x -27.6x –
EV/FCF – 5.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 6.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.75 0.19 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSQMSUIONR
Revenue growth (1Y) 59.0% -108.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.8% -27.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 150.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 134.4% 18.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -17.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 190.5% 57.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -7.2% 13.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 190.5% 55.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -15.7% 36.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 8.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 5.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSQMSUIONR
Gross margin 42.1% – –
EBITDA margin 52.7% – –
Operating margin 46.2% – –
Pretax margin 36.6% – –
Net margin 20.6% – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – -438.8% –
Return on equity 16.4% 29.1% –
Return on assets 8.6% 14.6% –
Return on invested capital 22.8% – –
Return on capital employed 23.4% 2.1% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – -3.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSQMSUIONR
Debt / assets 31.3% 10.4% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 0.5x –
Debt / FCF – 0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 47.9% 49.2% 0.9%
Equity / assets 52.1% 50.8% 99.1%
Interest coverage 15.3x – –
Current ratio 2.6x 1.7x 25.8x
Quick ratio 1.8x 1.0x 25.8x
Cash ratio 1.5x 0.5x 25.6x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSQMSUIONR
Dividend yield 4.2% 3.0% –
Net buyback yield – -3.8% –
Shareholder yield 4.2% -0.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 31.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 14.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSQMSUIONR
Forward P/E 8.1xFY2026 8.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $7.03FY2026 $9.19FY2026 $0.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +241.3%FY2026 +173.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -2.4% -18.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.31BFY2026 $45.53BFY2026 $717.29KFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +81.4%FY2026 +27.9%FY2026 +9.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% -11.6% -100.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSQMSUIONR
Held by institutions 13.4% 65.2% 3.9%
Institutions holding 316 752 34
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.0% -5.1% -10.1%
Institutions buying 166 367 20
Institutions selling 100 252 5
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.46 4.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SQMSUIONR
SQM 1.00 0.10 0.29
SU 0.10 1.00 0.00
IONR 0.29 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SQM, SU and IONR?

Suncor Energy (SU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $16.27B, Suncor Energy (SU) $94.86B, Ioneer (IONR) $180.54M.

Which stock is cheaper, SQM, SU and IONR?

Suncor Energy (SU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 11.7x, Suncor Energy (SU) 7.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is cheapest (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 8.1x, Suncor Energy (SU) 8.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +59.0%, Suncor Energy (SU) -108.8%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Suncor Energy (SU) returned the most: Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +25.0%, Suncor Energy (SU) +99.5%, Ioneer (IONR) -48.0%. Over five years, Suncor Energy (SU) compounded fastest (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +1.2%/yr, Suncor Energy (SU) +28.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has the highest dividend yield: Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 4.25%, Suncor Energy (SU) 3.02%. Ioneer (IONR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Suncor Energy (SU) has been the steadiest (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.0%, Suncor Energy (SU) 27.5%, Ioneer (IONR) 79.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SQM, SU and IONR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Suncor Energy (SU) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.