SOHU vs NTES vs PLTK Stock Comparison

Sohu.com, NetEase and Playtika Holding Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SOHU Sohu.com Ltd
$12.75 -2.3% 1M -18.0% 1Y
Market cap
$332.38M
P/E
1.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$599.25M
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
5 wins
NTES NetEase, Inc.
$114.09 -1.1% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$72.84B
P/E
16.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.70B
Div. yield
2.57%
Video Games Technology
5 wins
PLTK Playtika Holding Corp.
$2.06 -3.3% 1M -45.8% 1Y
Market cap
$785.68M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
4.85%
Video Games Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

NetEase leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (NetEase 5, Sohu.com 5, Playtika Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSOHUNTESPLTKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $332.38M $72.84B $785.68M NTES
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.6x 16.3x -2.8x SOHU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.9x 7.1x PLTK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.2% +9.8% +5.8% NTES
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 38.1% 26.6% -9.9% SOHU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.7% -5.0% NTES
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.4x 18.2x NTES
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.57% 4.85% PLTK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.0% -21.9% -45.8% SOHU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.4%/yr +2.7%/yr -41.1%/yr NTES
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.5% 33.2% 60.1% SOHU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 77/100 64/100 44/100 SOHU

Percentile Scorecard

SOHUNTESPLTK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSOHUNTESPLTK
Valuation 98 #4 of 167 60 #67 of 167 83 #30 of 167
Growth 63 #57 of 153 45 #84 of 153 14 #132 of 153
Profitability 60 #62 of 153 95 #8 of 153 48 #80 of 153
Financial Health 87 #24 of 179 85 #27 of 179 19 #146 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 34 #62 of 94 59 #39 of 94
Overall 77 64 44
  • SOHU ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • NTES ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • PLTK ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSOHUNTESPLTKSPY
1 month -2.3%-1.1%-3.3% -0.2%
3 months -3.8%-10.4%-48.2% +3.9%
6 months -18.0%+2.1%-40.8% +8.2%
Year to date -18.5%-17.1%-47.8% +12.9%
1 year -18.0%-21.9%-45.8% +12.3%
3 years +59.2%+6.8%-75.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +16.8%+2.2%-37.4% +23.3%
5 years -38.9%+14.1%-92.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -9.4%+2.7%-41.1% +10.9%
10 years -66.7%+113.6%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -10.4%+7.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSOHUNTESPLTKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.5%33.2%60.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.1%32.8%66.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.490.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.55-0.66-0.76 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.3%-52.0%-93.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.0%-22.7%-52.9% -1.2%
52-week high $17.22$147.56$4.37 $779.14
52-week low $11.74$109.26$2.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSOHUNTESPLTK
P/E now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 17.3x 16.3xmedian 17.3x -2.8xmedian 17.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.4x 4.4xmedian 1.4x 0.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.2x 10.3xmedian 14.2x 25.5xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.5x 9.8xmedian 11.5x 1.9xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.8x 3.0xmedian 1.8x -2.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.02median 0.40 2.27median 0.40 0.07median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSOHUNTESPLTK
Revenue $599.25M $16.70B $2.83B
Gross profit $526.14M $11.22B $2.08B
Operating income -$77.49M $5.90B -$97.60M
Net income $228.61M $4.75B -$279.70M
Free cash flow – $7.46B $419.10M
R&D $253.49M $2.59B $402.80M
EPS (diluted) $8.10 $6.91 $-0.73
Cash & equivalents $116.22M $3.36B $438.50M
Total debt – $5.39B $2.38B
Shares (diluted) 28.23M 643.63M 382.20M
Enterprise value -$3.01B $31.72B -$1.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSOHUNTESPLTK
P/E 1.6x 16.3x -2.8x
P/FCF – 9.8x 1.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.9x 1.7x
P/S 0.6x 4.4x 0.3x
P/B 0.3x 3.0x -2.0x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 3.0x -1.0x
EV/EBITDA – 10.3x 25.5x
EV/EBIT 6.5x 10.8x -28.0x
EV/Revenue -0.8x 3.8x 1.0x
EV/FCF – 8.6x 6.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.7x 6.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.02 2.27 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSOHUNTESPLTK
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.2% 9.8% 5.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.1% 5.5% 3.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.2% 16.9% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.2% 11.5% 3.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 2.6% 23.6% -129.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -6.0% 22.2% -29.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 83.6% -2.8% -423.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 75.0% 9.2% -42.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 108.2% -4.7% -418.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 83.4% 7.2% -41.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.9% -4.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.3% -1.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 12.3% -5.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.2% -1.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSOHUNTESPLTK
Gross margin 87.8% 67.2% 73.5%
EBITDA margin – 37.2% 3.8%
Operating margin -12.9% 35.3% -3.4%
Pretax margin -5.9% 34.9% -9.3%
Net margin 38.1% 26.6% -9.9%
FCF margin – 44.7% 14.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 44.0% 16.1%
Return on equity 17.8% 19.6% –
Return on assets 14.1% 14.0% -8.0%
Return on invested capital – 22.7% -5.0%
Return on capital employed -6.0% 23.0% -3.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x -1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.7% 2.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSOHUNTESPLTK
Debt / assets – 5.4% 72.4%
Debt / equity – 0.1x -6.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.4x 18.2x
Debt / FCF – 0.2x 5.7x
Liabilities / assets 20.6% 28.0% 112.1%
Equity / assets 79.4% 72.0% -12.1%
Interest coverage – – -0.6x
Current ratio 3.0x 3.5x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.7x 1.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 2.6x 1.3x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 7.28 0.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSOHUNTESPLTK
Dividend yield – 2.6% 4.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield – 2.6% 4.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSOHUNTESPLTK
Forward P/E – 11.9xFY2026 7.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.38FY2026 $9.56FY2026 $0.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -116.7%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +7.2% +134.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $351.88MFY2026 $17.11BFY2026 $2.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -39.8%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026 +6.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.8% +7.4% -1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSOHUNTESPLTK
Held by institutions 23.4% 9.2% 15.6%
Institutions holding 52 458 172
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.0% +1.9% -0.9%
Institutions buying 18 261 92
Institutions selling 20 121 59
Buyers to sellers 0.90 2.16 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SOHUNTESPLTK
SOHU 1.00 0.32 0.09
NTES 0.32 1.00 0.19
PLTK 0.09 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SOHU, NTES and PLTK?

NetEase (NTES) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sohu.com (SOHU) $332.38M, NetEase (NTES) $72.84B, Playtika Holding (PLTK) $785.68M.

Which stock is cheaper, SOHU, NTES and PLTK?

Sohu.com (SOHU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sohu.com (SOHU) 1.6x, NetEase (NTES) 16.3x, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -2.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Playtika Holding (PLTK) is cheapest (NetEase (NTES) 11.9x, Playtika Holding (PLTK) 7.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

NetEase (NTES) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sohu.com (SOHU) +9.2%, NetEase (NTES) +9.8%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) +5.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sohu.com (SOHU) has the highest net margin (Sohu.com (SOHU) 38.1%, NetEase (NTES) 26.6%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -9.9%). On return on invested capital, NetEase (NTES) leads (NetEase (NTES) 22.7%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -5.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sohu.com (SOHU) returned the most: Sohu.com (SOHU) -18.0%, NetEase (NTES) -21.9%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -45.8%. Over five years, NetEase (NTES) compounded fastest (Sohu.com (SOHU) -9.4%/yr, NetEase (NTES) +2.7%/yr, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -41.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Playtika Holding (PLTK) has the highest dividend yield: NetEase (NTES) 2.57%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) 4.85%. Sohu.com (SOHU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sohu.com (SOHU) has been the steadiest (Sohu.com (SOHU) 32.5%, NetEase (NTES) 33.2%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) 60.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SOHU, NTES and PLTK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetEase (NTES) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.