SNTL vs ICTSF vs SNT Stock Comparison

Sentinel Holdings, Icts International N V and Senstar Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SNTL Sentinel Holdings Ltd.
$1.35 -22.0% 1M -76.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.08M
P/E
0.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.58M
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
3 wins
SNT Senstar Technologies Corp
$1.52 -5.6% 1M -69.0% 1Y
Market cap
$35.46M
P/E
72.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.80M
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Icts International N V leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Icts International N V 3, Sentinel Holdings 3, Senstar Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNTLICTSFSNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.08M $207.76M $35.46M ICTSF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.9x -14.0x 72.1x SNTL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +250.7% — -3.2% SNTL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 311.9% — 1.3% SNTL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.3% +27.6% -69.0% ICTSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.6%/yr -6.6%/yr -17.3%/yr ICTSF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 136.7% 79.1% 59.0% SNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 — 50/100 SNT

Percentile Scorecard

SNTLICTSFSNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNTLICTSFSNT
Valuation 54 #52 of 112 33 #75 of 112 73 #31 of 112
Growth 97 #4 of 96 – 3 #93 of 96
Profitability 46 #50 of 91 – 36 #59 of 91
Financial Health 10 #113 of 125 52 #60 of 125 89 #15 of 125
Shareholder Returns 2 #66 of 67 – –
Overall 42 – 50
  • SNTL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNTLICTSFSNTSPY
1 month -22.0%-5.8%-5.6% -0.8%
3 months -64.5%+0.9%-14.1% +3.5%
6 months -75.5%+27.6%-47.2% +7.0%
Year to date -78.1%+66.2%-68.5% +12.2%
1 year -76.3%+27.6%-69.0% +13.0%
3 years -77.5%+20.7%+33.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year -39.2%+6.5%+10.1% +23.1%
5 years -32.5%-28.8%-61.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -7.6%-6.6%-17.3% +11.0%
10 years +1,025.0%+681.7%-65.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +27.4%+22.8%-10.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSNTLICTSFSNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 136.7%79.1%59.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 166.0%124.9%60.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.600.310.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.560.35-1.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -80.5%-68.3%-74.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -78.7%-13.6%-69.0% -1.8%
52-week high $6.35$6.42$4.91 $779.14
52-week low $1.27$3.10$1.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNTLICTSFSNT
P/E now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 21.9x -14.0xmedian 21.9x 72.1xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 0.9x 0.4xmedian 0.9x 1.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -3.2xmedian 12.2x —median 12.2x —median 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 14.3x -6.3xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median -3.6xmedian 2.3x -9.8xmedian 2.3x 0.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 1.02 —median 1.02 —median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNTLICTSFSNT
Revenue $4.58M – $36.80M
Gross profit $340.92K – $23.34M
Operating income -$4.61M – $729.00K
Net income -$881.22K – $378.00K
Free cash flow $2.17M – –
R&D – – $3.98M
EPS (diluted) $1.47 – $0.02
Cash & equivalents $146.09K $16.89M $7.88M
Total debt $3.26M $25.53M $1.14M
Shares (diluted) 9.69M 36.18M 23.46M
Enterprise value $11.74M $95.20M -$27.26M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFSNT
P/E 0.9x -14.0x 72.1x
P/FCF 6.0x -6.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 5.6x – –
P/S 2.9x 0.4x 1.0x
P/B -3.6x -9.8x 0.8x
P/Tangible book -2.9x -9.8x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA -3.2x – –
EV/EBIT -2.9x – 38.2x
EV/Revenue 2.9x – 0.8x
EV/FCF 6.2x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 5.8x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFSNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 250.7% – -3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -19.0% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 156.9% – -7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -38.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 43.4% – -86.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.3% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 90.2% – -92.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 322.4% – -90.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 104.3% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 328.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 245.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 312.6% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 237.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFSNT
Gross margin 7.4% – 63.4%
EBITDA margin -91.9% – –
Operating margin -100.8% – 2.0%
Pretax margin -18.1% – 2.4%
Net margin 311.9% – 1.3%
FCF margin 47.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin 50.6% – –
Return on equity – – 0.9%
Return on assets -40.8% – 0.7%
Return on invested capital – – 0.7%
Return on capital employed – – 1.6%
Asset turnover 2.1x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFSNT
Debt / assets 27.8% 4.7% 0.8%
Debt / equity -0.2x -0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x – –
Debt / FCF 0.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 279.9% 112.8% 20.6%
Equity / assets -179.9% -12.8% 79.4%
Interest coverage -9.2x – –
Current ratio 0.2x 1.8x 3.6x
Quick ratio 0.2x 1.6x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.6x 1.0x
Altman Z-score -24.05 – 3.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNTLICTSFSNT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -15.6% – –
Shareholder yield -15.6% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNTLICTSFSNT

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNTLICTSFSNT
SNTL 1.00 -0.07 -0.01
ICTSF -0.07 1.00 -0.03
SNT -0.01 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNTL, ICTSF and SNT?

Icts International N V (ICTSF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) $13.08M, Icts International N V (ICTSF) $207.76M, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $35.46M.

Which stock is cheaper, SNTL, ICTSF and SNT?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 0.9x, Icts International N V (ICTSF) -14.0x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 72.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) +250.7%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) has the highest net margin (Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 311.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icts International N V (ICTSF) returned the most: Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -76.3%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) +27.6%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -69.0%. Over five years, Icts International N V (ICTSF) compounded fastest (Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -7.6%/yr, Icts International N V (ICTSF) -6.6%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -17.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Senstar Technologies (SNT) has been the steadiest (Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 136.7%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) 79.1%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNTL, ICTSF and SNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Icts International N V (ICTSF) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.