SNT vs SNTL vs BCO Stock Comparison

Senstar Technologies, Sentinel Holdings and Brinks Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SNTL Sentinel Holdings Ltd.
$1.35 -22.0% 1M -76.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.08M
P/E
0.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.58M
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
4 wins
BCO Brinks Co
$110.86 +3.8% 1M -3.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.44B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.48B
Div. yield
0.01%
Security Services Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Brinks leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Brinks 6, Sentinel Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNTSNTLBCOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $35.81M $13.08M $4.44B BCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 72.8x 0.9x 24.5x SNTL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 13.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.2% +250.7% +8.1% SNTL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.3% 311.9% 3.3% SNTL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.7% — 6.9% BCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x 3.3x SNTL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.0% -76.3% -3.9% BCO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.3%/yr -7.6%/yr +11.0%/yr BCO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.0% 136.7% 34.1% BCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 42/100 52/100 BCO

Percentile Scorecard

SNTSNTLBCO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNTSNTLBCO
Valuation 73 #31 of 112 54 #52 of 112 64 #41 of 112
Growth 3 #93 of 96 97 #4 of 96 63 #36 of 96
Profitability 36 #59 of 91 46 #50 of 91 67 #31 of 91
Financial Health 89 #15 of 125 10 #113 of 125 24 #95 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 2 #66 of 67 41 #40 of 67
Overall 50 42 52
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SNTL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BCO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNTSNTLBCOSPY
1 month -5.6%-22.0%+3.8% -0.8%
3 months -14.1%-64.5%-6.0% +3.5%
6 months -47.2%-75.5%+3.8% +7.0%
Year to date -68.5%-78.1%-5.0% +12.2%
1 year -69.0%-76.3%-3.9% +13.0%
3 years +33.3%-77.5%+68.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +10.1%-39.2%+19.1% +23.1%
5 years -61.2%-32.5%+68.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.3%-7.6%+11.0% +11.0%
10 years -65.7%+1,025.0%+182.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year -10.1%+27.4%+10.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSNTSNTLBCOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.0%136.7%34.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.6%166.0%33.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.88-0.600.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.17-0.56-0.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.7%-80.5%-33.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.0%-78.7%-18.2% -1.8%
52-week high $4.91$6.35$135.58 $779.14
52-week low $1.34$1.27$92.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNTSNTLBCO
P/E now vs peer median 72.1xmedian 21.9x 0.9xmedian 21.9x 25.4xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.9x 2.9xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.2x -3.2xmedian 12.2x 8.4xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.3x 6.0xmedian 14.3x 11.6xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.3x -3.6xmedian 2.3x 10.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 0.01median 1.02 1.11median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNTSNTLBCO
Revenue $36.80M $4.58M $5.48B
Gross profit $23.34M $340.92K $1.45B
Operating income $729.00K -$4.61M $576.00M
Net income $378.00K -$881.22K $191.00M
Free cash flow – $2.17M $393.60M
R&D $3.98M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.02 $1.47 $4.36
Cash & equivalents $7.88M $146.09K $1.66B
Total debt $1.14M $3.26M $4.59B
Shares (diluted) 23.46M 9.69M 41.50M
Enterprise value -$26.91M $11.74M -$1.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNTSNTLBCO
P/E 72.1x 0.9x 25.4x
P/FCF – 6.0x 11.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 5.6x 8.1x
P/S 1.0x 2.9x 0.8x
P/B 0.8x -3.6x 10.3x
P/Tangible book 0.8x -2.9x 51.4x
EV/EBITDA – -3.2x 8.4x
EV/EBIT 38.2x -2.9x 13.0x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.9x 1.4x
EV/FCF – 6.2x 19.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 5.8x 13.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.01 1.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNTSNTLBCO
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.2% 250.7% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -19.0% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.5% 156.9% 13.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -38.0% 9.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -86.3% 43.4% 22.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 2.3% 14.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -92.6% 90.2% 9.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 22.2% 15.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -90.5% 322.4% 13.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 104.3% 22.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 328.9% -1.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 245.0% 1.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 312.6% 13.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 237.5% 3.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNTSNTLBCO
Gross margin 63.4% 7.4% 26.4%
EBITDA margin – -91.9% 16.3%
Operating margin 2.0% -100.8% 10.5%
Pretax margin 2.4% -18.1% 5.9%
Net margin 1.3% 311.9% 3.3%
FCF margin – 47.4% 7.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 50.6% 10.2%
Return on equity 0.9% – 45.7%
Return on assets 0.7% -40.8% 2.6%
Return on invested capital 0.7% – 6.9%
Return on capital employed 1.6% – 11.0%
Asset turnover 0.7x 2.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -2.6x 2.9x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNTSNTLBCO
Debt / assets 0.8% 27.8% 62.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x -0.2x 10.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x 3.3x
Debt / FCF – 0.3x 11.7x
Liabilities / assets 20.6% 279.9% 94.0%
Equity / assets 79.4% -179.9% 6.0%
Interest coverage – -9.2x 2.3x
Current ratio 3.6x 0.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 2.2x 0.2x 1.2x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.0x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 3.07 -24.05 1.67

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNTSNTLBCO
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield – -15.6% 2.4%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -15.6% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 22.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 10.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -0.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNTSNTLBCO
Forward P/E – – 13.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $8.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -0.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +24.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $5.22BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – -0.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +4.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNTSNTLBCO
Held by institutions – – 100.0%
Institutions holding – – 359
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +12.1%
Institutions buying – – 182
Institutions selling – – 122
Buyers to sellers – – 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNTSNTLBCO
SNT 1.00 -0.01 -0.04
SNTL -0.01 1.00 -0.07
BCO -0.04 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNT, SNTL and BCO?

Brinks (BCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Senstar Technologies (SNT) $35.81M, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) $13.08M, Brinks (BCO) $4.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, SNT, SNTL and BCO?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 72.8x, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 0.9x, Brinks (BCO) 24.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) +250.7%, Brinks (BCO) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) has the highest net margin (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 311.9%, Brinks (BCO) 3.3%). On return on invested capital, Brinks (BCO) leads (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%, Brinks (BCO) 6.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brinks (BCO) returned the most: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -69.0%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -76.3%, Brinks (BCO) -3.9%. Over five years, Brinks (BCO) compounded fastest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) -17.3%/yr, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -7.6%/yr, Brinks (BCO) +11.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.00%, Brinks (BCO) 0.01%. Senstar Technologies (SNT) and Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brinks (BCO) has been the steadiest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 136.7%, Brinks (BCO) 34.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNT, SNTL and BCO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brinks (BCO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.