SNT vs RSKIA Stock Comparison

Senstar Technologies and George Risk Industries Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

George Risk Industries leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (George Risk Industries 8). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNTRSKIALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $35.81M $102.61M RSKIA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 72.8x 10.5x RSKIA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.2% +13.9% RSKIA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.3% 37.9% RSKIA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.0% +23.5% RSKIA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.3%/yr +9.7%/yr RSKIA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.0% 25.5% RSKIA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 87/100 RSKIA

Percentile Scorecard

SNTRSKIA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNTRSKIA
Valuation 73 #31 of 112 78 #26 of 112
Growth 3 #93 of 96 87 #13 of 96
Profitability 36 #59 of 91 86 #14 of 91
Financial Health 89 #15 of 125 99 #2 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 86 #10 of 67
Overall 50 87
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • RSKIA ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNTRSKIASPY
1 month -5.6%-6.2% -0.8%
3 months -14.1%+10.6% +3.5%
6 months -47.2%+13.6% +7.0%
Year to date -68.5%+21.7% +12.2%
1 year -69.0%+23.5% +13.0%
3 years +33.3%+78.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +10.1%+21.4% +23.1%
5 years -61.2%+59.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.3%+9.7% +11.0%
10 years -65.7%+190.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year -10.1%+11.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSNTRSKIASPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.0%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.6%32.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.880.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.170.92 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.7%-39.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.0%-7.7% -1.8%
52-week high $4.91$22.75 $779.14
52-week low $1.34$16.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNTRSKIA
P/E now vs peer median 72.1xmedian 21.9x 10.5xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.9x 4.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.2x 7.0xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.3x 24.3xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.3x 1.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 0.60median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNTRSKIA
Revenue $36.80M $25.81M
Gross profit $23.34M $12.15M
Operating income $729.00K $7.06M
Net income $378.00K $9.79M
Free cash flow – $4.22M
R&D $3.98M –
EPS (diluted) $0.02 $1.99
Cash & equivalents $7.88M $6.84M
Total debt $1.14M –
Shares (diluted) 23.46M 4.91M
Enterprise value -$26.91M -$85.67M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNTRSKIA
P/E 72.1x 10.5x
P/FCF – 24.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 22.9x
P/S 1.0x 4.0x
P/B 0.8x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA – 7.0x
EV/EBIT 38.2x 7.4x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.0x
EV/FCF – 12.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 11.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNTRSKIA
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.2% 13.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.5% 10.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -86.3% 12.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 13.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -92.6% 19.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 17.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -90.5% 19.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 17.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 7.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 29.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 45.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNTRSKIA
Gross margin 63.4% 47.1%
EBITDA margin – 29.0%
Operating margin 2.0% 27.4%
Pretax margin 2.4% 50.9%
Net margin 1.3% 37.9%
FCF margin – 16.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 17.3%
Return on equity 0.9% 15.2%
Return on assets 0.7% 13.4%
Return on invested capital 0.7% –
Return on capital employed 1.6% 10.4%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNTRSKIA
Debt / assets 0.8% –
Debt / equity 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 20.6% 11.9%
Equity / assets 79.4% 88.1%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 3.6x 14.6x
Quick ratio 2.2x 11.2x
Cash ratio 1.0x 10.3x
Altman Z-score 3.07 10.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNTRSKIA
Dividend yield – 6.0%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNTRSKIA

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNTRSKIA
SNT 1.00 0.04
RSKIA 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNT and RSKIA?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Senstar Technologies (SNT) $35.81M, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) $102.61M.

Which stock is cheaper, SNT and RSKIA?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 72.8x, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 10.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +13.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has the highest net margin (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 37.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year George Risk Industries (RSKIA) returned the most: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -69.0%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +23.5%. Over five years, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) compounded fastest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) -17.3%/yr, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +9.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has been the steadiest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do SNT and RSKIA move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.04, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, SNT and RSKIA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.