SNT vs RNGE vs ICTSF Stock Comparison

Senstar Technologies, Range Impact and Icts International N V Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RNGE Range Impact, Inc.
$0.50 -33.3% 1M +194.1% 1Y
Market cap
$57.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Range Impact leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Range Impact 2, Icts International N V 1, Senstar Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNTRNGEICTSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $35.81M $57.71M $207.76M ICTSF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 72.8x — -14.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.2% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.3% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.0% +194.1% +27.6% RNGE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.3%/yr +16.8%/yr -6.6%/yr RNGE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.0% 131.4% 79.1% SNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

SNTRNGEICTSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNTRNGEICTSF
Valuation 73 #31 of 112 – 33 #75 of 112
Growth 3 #93 of 96 – –
Profitability 36 #59 of 91 – –
Financial Health 89 #15 of 125 – 52 #60 of 125
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 50 – –
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • RNGE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNTRNGEICTSFSPY
1 month -5.6%-33.3%-5.8% -0.8%
3 months -14.1%-39.8%+0.9% +3.5%
6 months -47.2%+163.2%+27.6% +7.0%
Year to date -68.5%+233.3%+66.2% +12.2%
1 year -69.0%+194.1%+27.6% +13.0%
3 years +33.3%+212.5%+20.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +10.1%+46.2%+6.5% +23.1%
5 years -61.2%+117.4%-28.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.3%+16.8%-6.6% +11.0%
10 years -65.7%-65.5%+681.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year -10.1%-10.1%+22.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSNTRNGEICTSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.0%131.4%79.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.6%154.2%124.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.881.250.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.171.480.35 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.7%-73.0%-68.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.0%-47.9%-13.6% -1.8%
52-week high $4.91$0.96$6.42 $779.14
52-week low $1.34$0.13$3.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNTRNGEICTSF
P/E now vs peer median 72.1xmedian 21.9x —median 7.8x -14.0xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.9x —median 4.9x 0.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.2x —median 11.2x —median 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.3x —median 6.4x -6.3xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.3x —median 0.6x -9.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 —median 0.33 —median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNTRNGEICTSF
Revenue $36.80M – –
Gross profit $23.34M – –
Operating income $729.00K – –
Net income $378.00K – –
R&D $3.98M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.02 – –
Cash & equivalents $7.88M – $16.89M
Total debt $1.14M – $25.53M
Shares (diluted) 23.46M 115.42M 36.18M
Enterprise value -$26.91M $57.71M $95.20M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNTRNGEICTSF
P/E 72.1x – -14.0x
P/FCF – – -6.3x
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 1.0x – 0.4x
P/B 0.8x – -9.8x
P/Tangible book 0.8x – -9.8x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT 38.2x – –
EV/Revenue 0.8x – –
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNTRNGEICTSF
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.2% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.5% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -86.3% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -92.6% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) -90.5% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNTRNGEICTSF
Gross margin 63.4% – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin 2.0% – –
Pretax margin 2.4% – –
Net margin 1.3% – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity 0.9% – –
Return on assets 0.7% – –
Return on invested capital 0.7% – –
Return on capital employed 1.6% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNTRNGEICTSF
Debt / assets 0.8% – 4.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x – -0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 20.6% – 112.8%
Equity / assets 79.4% – -12.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.6x – 1.8x
Quick ratio 2.2x – 1.6x
Cash ratio 1.0x – 0.6x
Altman Z-score 3.07 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNTRNGEICTSF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNTRNGEICTSF

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNTRNGEICTSF
SNT 1.00 -0.02 -0.03
RNGE -0.02 1.00 -0.14
ICTSF -0.03 -0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNT, RNGE and ICTSF?

Icts International N V (ICTSF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Senstar Technologies (SNT) $35.81M, Range Impact (RNGE) $57.71M, Icts International N V (ICTSF) $207.76M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Range Impact (RNGE) returned the most: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -69.0%, Range Impact (RNGE) +194.1%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) +27.6%. Over five years, Range Impact (RNGE) compounded fastest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) -17.3%/yr, Range Impact (RNGE) +16.8%/yr, Icts International N V (ICTSF) -6.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Senstar Technologies (SNT) has been the steadiest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%, Range Impact (RNGE) 131.4%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) 79.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNT, RNGE and ICTSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Range Impact (RNGE) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.