SND vs SQM vs LOGC Stock Comparison

Smart Sand, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile and ContextLogic Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SND Smart Sand, Inc.
$4.84 -7.5% 1M +116.1% 1Y
Market cap
$194.73M
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$386.99M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 5, Smart Sand 4, ContextLogic Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNDSQMLOGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $194.73M $17.23B $704.35M SQM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.6x 12.4x -306.2x SQM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.5% +59.0% +20.3% SQM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.7% 20.6% -2.9% SQM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.1% 22.8% — SQM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.2x 6.0x SND
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +116.1% +25.0% +99.2% SND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.5%/yr +1.2%/yr -36.6%/yr SND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.8% 47.0% 27.3% LOGC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 70/100 30/100 SND

Percentile Scorecard

SNDSQMLOGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNDSQMLOGC
Valuation 96 #7 of 162 81 #31 of 162 44 #91 of 162
Growth 75 #37 of 147 62 #56 of 147 10 #133 of 147
Profitability 55 #55 of 122 81 #24 of 122 38 #76 of 122
Financial Health 45 #92 of 165 32 #112 of 165 29 #118 of 165
Shareholder Returns 94 #7 of 107 92 #10 of 107 28 #77 of 107
Overall 73 70 30
  • SND ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SQM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LOGC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNDSQMLOGCSPY
1 month -7.5%-14.8%+3.3% -0.8%
3 months +2.5%-17.2%+62.5% +3.5%
6 months -10.5%-37.6%+79.3% +7.0%
Year to date +21.0%-17.2%+101.1% +12.2%
1 year +116.1%+25.0%+99.2% +13.0%
3 years +139.6%+11.5%+315.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +33.8%+3.7%+60.8% +23.1%
5 years +105.1%+5.9%-89.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +15.5%+1.2%-36.6% +11.0%
10 years —+94.6%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+6.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSNDSQMLOGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.8%47.0%27.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 80.9%43.9%25.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.100.960.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.640.533.63 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.3%-73.5%-97.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.8%-40.2%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $5.82$95.31$15.24 $779.14
52-week low $2.09$44.36$7.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNDSQMLOGC
P/E now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 12.8x 11.7xmedian 12.8x -303.1xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 3.1x 2.4xmedian 3.1x 8.8xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 7.0x 4.8xmedian 7.0x 27.0xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 15.2x —median 15.2x -16.0xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.1x 1.9xmedian 2.1x 0.9xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.88median 0.29 -0.75median 0.29 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNDSQMLOGC
Revenue $386.99M $6.73B $79.50M
Gross profit $52.09M $2.83B $41.90M
Operating income $7.85M $3.11B -$9.90M
Net income $10.49M $1.39B -$300.00K
Free cash flow $34.63M – -$43.60M
EPS (diluted) $0.25 $4.86 $-0.05
Cash & equivalents $10.20M $3.38B $11.00M
Total debt $14.66M $19.72B $211.50M
Shares (diluted) 41.37M 285.64M 45.74M
Enterprise value $137.45M $3.89B $311.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNDSQMLOGC
P/E 18.1x 11.7x -303.1x
P/FCF 5.4x – -16.0x
P/Operating cash flow 4.0x – -17.6x
P/S 0.5x 2.4x 8.8x
P/B 0.8x 1.9x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 1.9x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 5.0x 4.8x 27.0x
EV/EBIT 24.6x 5.5x -90.7x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 2.5x 11.3x
EV/FCF 5.6x – -20.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.1x – -22.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.88 -0.75 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNDSQMLOGC
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.5% 59.0% 20.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.6% -4.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 64.5% 150.2% 63.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.5% -9.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 193.0% 134.4% -186.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.3% -17.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 1,206% 190.5% -106.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.4% -7.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 1,143% 190.5% -129.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.3% -15.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 350.4% – -590.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16,392% – -1,218%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNDSQMLOGC
Gross margin 13.5% 42.1% 52.7%
EBITDA margin 10.0% 52.7% 41.8%
Operating margin 2.0% 46.2% -12.5%
Pretax margin 1.9% 36.6% -19.6%
Net margin 2.7% 20.6% -2.9%
FCF margin 8.9% – -54.8%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% – -49.9%
Return on equity 4.4% 16.4% -2.1%
Return on assets 3.1% 8.6% -1.6%
Return on invested capital 3.1% 22.8% –
Return on capital employed 2.7% 23.4% -1.0%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.4x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.5x – 132.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% – 14.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNDSQMLOGC
Debt / assets 4.2% 31.3% 21.8%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.6x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.2x 6.0x
Debt / FCF 0.4x – -4.9x
Liabilities / assets 31.4% 47.9% 24.0%
Equity / assets 68.6% 52.1% 76.0%
Interest coverage – 15.3x –
Current ratio 1.7x 2.6x 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.8x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.5x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 2.64 – -2.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNDSQMLOGC
Dividend yield 5.2% 4.2% –
Net buyback yield 0.8% – -3.7%
Shareholder yield 6.0% 4.2% -3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNDSQMLOGC
Forward P/E – 8.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.27FY2026 $7.12FY2026 $-0.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -1,000.0%FY2026 +245.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -2.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $380.19MFY2026 $8.37BFY2026 $0.00FY2025
Revenue growth, next FY +15.2%FY2026 +82.7%FY2026 -100.0%FY2025
Revenue growth, the year after – +2.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNDSQMLOGC
Held by institutions 49.7% 13.4% –
Institutions holding 91 316 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.9% -3.0% –
Institutions buying 69 166 –
Institutions selling 17 100 –
Buyers to sellers 4.06 1.66 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNDSQMLOGC
SND 1.00 0.09 0.01
SQM 0.09 1.00 0.05
LOGC 0.01 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SND, SQM and LOGC?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Smart Sand (SND) $194.73M, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $17.23B, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) $704.35M.

Which stock is cheaper, SND, SQM and LOGC?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Smart Sand (SND) 18.6x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 12.4x, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -306.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Smart Sand (SND) +26.5%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +59.0%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +20.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has the highest net margin (Smart Sand (SND) 2.7%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 20.6%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -2.9%). On return on invested capital, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads (Smart Sand (SND) 3.1%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 22.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Smart Sand (SND) returned the most: Smart Sand (SND) +116.1%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +25.0%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +99.2%. Over five years, Smart Sand (SND) compounded fastest (Smart Sand (SND) +15.5%/yr, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +1.2%/yr, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -36.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) has been the steadiest (Smart Sand (SND) 70.8%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.0%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 27.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SND, SQM and LOGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.