SNA vs SWK vs EMR Stock Comparison

Snap-on, Stanley Black & Decker and Emerson Electric Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SNA Snap-on Inc
$358.26 -2.4% 1M +6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$18.53B
P/E
18.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
4 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$170.76 +8.6% 1M +25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$92.00B
P/E
35.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Emerson Electric leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Emerson Electric 5, Snap-on 4, Stanley Black & Decker 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNASWKEMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.53B $15.50B $92.00B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.3x 25.0x 35.7x SNA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.5x 17.8x 25.3x SWK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.6% +4.8% EMR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 4.1% 13.8% EMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.6% 10.9% EMR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.3x 1.8x EMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.01% SWK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.3% +48.1% +25.2% SWK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.0%/yr -10.4%/yr +12.0%/yr SNA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.0% 36.5% 31.8% SNA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 59/100 45/100 SNA

Percentile Scorecard

SNASWKEMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNASWKEMR
Valuation 55 #93 of 203 88 #25 of 203 33 #136 of 203
Growth 36 #120 of 188 81 #37 of 188 41 #112 of 188
Profitability 67 #62 of 183 52 #89 of 183 87 #24 of 183
Financial Health 86 #31 of 216 28 #156 of 216 30 #152 of 216
Shareholder Returns 89 #18 of 152 48 #80 of 152 35 #99 of 152
Overall 66 59 45
  • SNA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SWK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNASWKEMRSPY
1 month -2.4%+16.7%+8.6% +0.7%
3 months -12.4%+8.4%+14.9% +3.7%
6 months -6.6%+32.5%+21.6% +7.1%
Year to date +4.0%+39.5%+28.7% +12.8%
1 year +6.3%+48.1%+25.2% +11.9%
3 years +40.8%+23.0%+93.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +12.1%+7.1%+24.5% +22.8%
5 years +76.3%-42.4%+76.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +12.0%-10.4%+12.0% +10.9%
10 years +133.8%-9.4%+240.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +8.9%-1.0%+13.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSNASWKEMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.0%36.5%31.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 19.3%32.3%33.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.571.401.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.331.320.79 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -21.3%-71.6%-29.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.5%-0.4%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $419.26$104.00$170.76 $779.14
52-week low $328.69$62.12$123.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNASWKEMR
P/E now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 25.8x 25.1xmedian 25.8x 37.0xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x 5.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.6x 10.9xmedian 14.6x 17.2xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 22.2x 12.1xmedian 22.2x 27.5xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 2.2x 1.7xmedian 2.2x 4.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 12.85median 1.45 -4.76median 1.45 -0.89median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNASWKEMR
Revenue – $15.25B $18.64B
Gross profit – $4.86B $9.91B
Operating income $1.31B $1.32B $4.68B
Net income $1.04B $620.50M $2.58B
Free cash flow – $1.29B $3.46B
EPS (diluted) $19.25 $4.12 $4.59
Cash & equivalents $1.67B $592.40M $2.18B
Total debt – $4.76B $13.11B
Shares (diluted) 52.52M 150.65M 561.10M
Enterprise value $18.53B $14.03B $84.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNASWKEMR
P/E 18.3x 25.1x 37.0x
P/FCF 17.2x 12.1x 27.5x
P/Operating cash flow 16.0x 10.1x 24.3x
P/S 3.6x 1.0x 5.1x
P/B 3.0x 1.7x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 3.2x 2.6x 8.1x
EV/EBITDA – 10.9x 17.2x
EV/EBIT – 15.0x 22.7x
EV/Revenue – 1.3x 5.7x
EV/FCF – 15.4x 30.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x 12.8x 27.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.85 -4.76 -0.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNASWKEMR
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.6% 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -2.0% 7.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.3% 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.2% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.7% 51.4% 9.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.4% 149.6% 13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -0.3% 29.7% -3.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% -7.7% -42.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 0.4% 30.7% -2.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.4% -5.3% -41.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 104.3% 4.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 96.8% 10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 211.7% 4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 110.2% 9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNASWKEMR
Gross margin – 31.9% 53.2%
EBITDA margin – 11.9% 33.1%
Operating margin – 8.6% 25.1%
Pretax margin – 5.6% 17.6%
Net margin – 4.1% 13.8%
FCF margin – 8.5% 18.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 10.2% 21.0%
Return on equity 17.0% 6.9% 12.7%
Return on assets 12.0% 3.0% 6.1%
Return on invested capital – 6.6% 10.9%
Return on capital employed – 8.0% 14.9%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 2.5x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNASWKEMR
Debt / assets – 23.7% 31.1%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.3x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 3.7x 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 29.3% 55.4% 51.7%
Equity / assets 70.7% 44.6% 48.3%
Interest coverage – 2.8x –
Current ratio 3.5x 1.4x 0.9x
Quick ratio – 0.5x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 2.52 4.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNASWKEMR
Dividend yield 2.7% 3.2% 1.3%
Net buyback yield – 1.7% 1.0%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 4.9% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 81.0% 47.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 39.0% 35.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.3% 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% 0.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNASWKEMR
Forward P/E 19.5xFY2026 17.8xFY2026 25.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $18.35FY2026 $5.81FY2026 $6.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -4.4%FY2026 +24.4%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.5% +5.2% +15.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.58BFY2026 $16.13BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.4%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.2% +0.4% +15.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNASWKEMR
Held by institutions 96.3% 95.7% 82.1%
Institutions holding 1,070 772 2,292
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +5.3% +0.9%
Institutions buying 498 417 1,081
Institutions selling 370 244 799
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.71 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNASWKEMR
SNA 1.00 0.60 0.56
SWK 0.60 1.00 0.59
EMR 0.56 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNA, SWK and EMR?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Snap-on (SNA) $18.53B, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) $15.50B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $92.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, SNA, SWK and EMR?

Snap-on (SNA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Snap-on (SNA) 18.3x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 25.0x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 35.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is cheapest (Snap-on (SNA) 19.5x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 17.8x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 25.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Emerson Electric (EMR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +0.6%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest net margin (Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 4.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Emerson Electric (EMR) leads (Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 6.6%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) returned the most: Snap-on (SNA) +6.3%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +48.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +25.2%. Over five years, Snap-on (SNA) compounded fastest (Snap-on (SNA) +12.0%/yr, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) -10.4%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +12.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) has the highest dividend yield: Snap-on (SNA) 0.00%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 0.03%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%. Snap-on (SNA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Snap-on (SNA) has been the steadiest (Snap-on (SNA) 19.0%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 36.5%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNA, SWK and EMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Emerson Electric (EMR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.