SMID vs URI vs MAS Stock Comparison

Smith Midland, United Rentals and Masco Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SMID Smith Midland Corp
$21.20 -12.7% 1M -47.1% 1Y
Market cap
$112.72M
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.50M
Div. yield
–
Building Products Industrials
3 wins
URI United Rentals, Inc.
$1,122.70 +7.3% 1M +22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$72.29B
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.50B
Div. yield
–
Equipment Rental Industrials
5 wins
MAS Masco Corp /De/
$75.50 +9.6% 1M +10.8% 1Y
Market cap
$14.93B
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.02%
Building Products Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Rentals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (United Rentals 5, Smith Midland 3, Masco 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSMIDURIMASLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $112.72M $72.29B $14.93B URI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.6x 25.3x 16.9x SMID
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.3x 15.8x MAS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.6% +9.4% -0.6% URI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.6% 16.3% 11.6% URI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.8% 14.0% 33.9% MAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 2.3x — SMID
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.1% +22.9% +10.8% URI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.4%/yr +26.5%/yr +3.3%/yr URI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.1% 42.2% 35.7% MAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 58/100 64/100 SMID

Percentile Scorecard

SMIDURIMAS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSMIDURIMAS
Valuation 86 #9 of 56 27 #34 of 46 71 #17 of 56
Growth 78 #12 of 52 90 #5 of 39 41 #31 of 52
Profitability 66 #18 of 51 92 #4 of 40 98 #2 of 51
Financial Health 93 #5 of 58 19 #40 of 49 46 #32 of 58
Shareholder Returns – 61 #13 of 32 65 #15 of 41
Overall 81 58 64
  • SMID ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • URI ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • MAS ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSMIDURIMASSPY
1 month -12.7%+7.3%+9.6% -0.8%
3 months -31.5%-0.4%-7.0% +3.5%
6 months -36.7%+17.0%+1.7% +7.0%
Year to date -41.7%+38.7%+19.0% +12.2%
1 year -47.1%+22.9%+10.8% +13.0%
3 years +9.4%+181.4%+47.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +3.1%+41.2%+14.0% +23.1%
5 years +18.4%+223.0%+17.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.4%+26.5%+3.3% +11.0%
10 years +480.8%+1,373.6%+146.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +19.2%+30.9%+9.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSMIDURIMASSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.1%42.2%35.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.4%39.1%33.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.981.031.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.920.540.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.4%-40.0%-38.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.8%-3.7%-8.8% -1.8%
52-week high $39.82$1,165.29$82.77 $779.14
52-week low $21.20$710.47$58.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSMIDURIMAS
P/E now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 19.4x 24.4xmedian 25.1x 17.0xmedian 19.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.5x 4.0xmedian 1.0x 2.0xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 12.1x 13.3xmedian 13.3x —median 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 16.1x 78.0xmedian 21.5x 13.2xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.9x 7.2xmedian 2.4x -40.8xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.93 2.56median 2.38 2.16median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSMIDURIMAS
Revenue $89.50M $17.50B $7.62B
Gross profit $21.00M $6.84B $2.82B
Operating income $10.80M $4.47B $1.34B
Net income $7.73M $2.86B $937.00M
Free cash flow $4.17M $892.00M $1.13B
EPS (diluted) $1.46 $45.89 $4.45
Cash & equivalents $10.66M $153.00M $548.00M
Total debt $17.45M $14.67B $3.25B
Shares (diluted) 5.31M 62.26M 199.00M
Enterprise value $63.58M $71.41B $12.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSMIDURIMAS
P/E 14.6x 24.4x 17.0x
P/FCF 27.0x 78.0x 13.2x
P/Operating cash flow 7.7x 11.2x 11.5x
P/S 1.3x 4.0x 2.0x
P/B 2.0x 7.2x -40.8x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 7.6x -26.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.4x 13.3x –
EV/EBIT 9.8x 18.8x 13.2x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 4.8x 2.3x
EV/FCF 25.4x 94.3x 15.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.3x 13.6x 13.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 2.56 2.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSMIDURIMAS
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.6% 9.4% -0.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.4% 8.0% -2.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -18.4% 10.4% 1.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 35.0% 6.0% 1.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -30.8% 11.5% -0.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 134.1% 5.7% 2.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -49.1% 12.9% 9.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 136.0% 6.2% 3.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -35.9% 16.6% 16.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 135.4% 9.5% 7.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 92.5% 24.2% 33.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 97.2% 10.9% 5.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 459.8% 98.2% 39.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 38.5% 83.7% 10.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSMIDURIMAS
Gross margin 23.5% 39.1% 37.0%
EBITDA margin 16.1% 36.1% –
Operating margin 12.1% 25.5% 17.5%
Pretax margin 12.0% 21.8% 16.2%
Net margin 8.6% 16.3% 11.6%
FCF margin 4.7% 5.1% 14.8%
Operating cash flow margin 16.3% 35.4% 16.9%
Return on equity 13.7% 30.2% –
Return on assets 8.6% 8.9% 17.6%
Return on invested capital 12.8% 14.0% 33.9%
Return on capital employed 13.8% 16.5% 36.4%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.5x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 2.2x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSMIDURIMAS
Debt / assets 4.8% 44.7% 60.1%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.5x -8.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 1.0x 16.4x 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 34.2% 70.4% 106.8%
Equity / assets 65.8% 29.6% -6.8%
Interest coverage 48.9x – 13.0x
Current ratio 4.1x 0.8x 1.9x
Quick ratio 3.1x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.0x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 5.00 3.51 3.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSMIDURIMAS
Dividend yield – 0.7% 1.7%
Net buyback yield – 2.6% 6.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.3% 7.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 27.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 22.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 0.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSMIDURIMAS
Forward P/E – 20.3xFY2026 15.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $55.27FY2026 $4.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +31.4%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +6.3% -7.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $18.69BFY2026 $7.23BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +16.1%FY2026 -4.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.1% +15.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSMIDURIMAS
Held by institutions 57.0% 95.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 56 1,586 921
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.1% +4.7% +0.7%
Institutions buying 23 803 497
Institutions selling 17 537 289
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.50 1.72

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SMIDURIMAS
SMID 1.00 0.19 0.31
URI 0.19 1.00 0.41
MAS 0.31 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SMID, URI and MAS?

United Rentals (URI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Smith Midland (SMID) $112.72M, United Rentals (URI) $72.29B, Masco (MAS) $14.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, SMID, URI and MAS?

Smith Midland (SMID) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Smith Midland (SMID) 14.6x, United Rentals (URI) 25.3x, Masco (MAS) 16.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Masco (MAS) is cheapest (United Rentals (URI) 20.3x, Masco (MAS) 15.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Rentals (URI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Smith Midland (SMID) -1.6%, United Rentals (URI) +9.4%, Masco (MAS) -0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Rentals (URI) has the highest net margin (Smith Midland (SMID) 8.6%, United Rentals (URI) 16.3%, Masco (MAS) 11.6%). On return on invested capital, Masco (MAS) leads (Smith Midland (SMID) 12.8%, United Rentals (URI) 14.0%, Masco (MAS) 33.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Rentals (URI) returned the most: Smith Midland (SMID) -47.1%, United Rentals (URI) +22.9%, Masco (MAS) +10.8%. Over five years, United Rentals (URI) compounded fastest (Smith Midland (SMID) +3.4%/yr, United Rentals (URI) +26.5%/yr, Masco (MAS) +3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Smith Midland (SMID) 0.00%, United Rentals (URI) 0.00%, Masco (MAS) 0.02%. Smith Midland (SMID) and United Rentals (URI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Masco (MAS) has been the steadiest (Smith Midland (SMID) 51.1%, United Rentals (URI) 42.2%, Masco (MAS) 35.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SMID, URI and MAS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Rentals (URI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.