SMID vs MAS vs CSL Stock Comparison

Smith Midland, Masco and Carlisle Companies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SMID Smith Midland Corp
$21.26 -12.4% 1M -45.6% 1Y
Market cap
$112.83M
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.50M
Div. yield
–
Building Products Industrials
3 wins
MAS Masco Corp /De/
$75.15 +9.1% 1M +10.0% 1Y
Market cap
$14.82B
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
1.69%
Building Products Industrials
6 wins
CSL Carlisle Companies Inc
$349.13 +6.9% 1M +3.1% 1Y
Market cap
$13.90B
P/E
19.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.10B
Div. yield
1.30%
Building Products Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Masco leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Masco 6, Smith Midland 3, Carlisle Companies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSMIDMASCSLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $112.83M $14.82B $13.90B MAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.6x 16.9x 19.4x SMID
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.7x 16.0x MAS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.6% -0.6% +1.9% CSL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.6% 11.6% 14.2% CSL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.8% 33.9% 17.4% MAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — 1.8x SMID
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.69% 1.30% MAS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.6% +10.0% +3.1% MAS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.8%/yr +2.8%/yr +9.2%/yr CSL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.0% 35.6% 36.7% MAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 80/100 62/100 58/100 SMID

Percentile Scorecard

SMIDMASCSL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSMIDMASCSL
Valuation 84 #10 of 56 71 #17 of 56 44 #32 of 56
Growth 80 #11 of 52 41 #31 of 52 33 #35 of 52
Profitability 65 #18 of 49 94 #4 of 49 92 #5 of 49
Financial Health 93 #5 of 56 44 #32 of 56 49 #29 of 56
Shareholder Returns – 63 #16 of 41 73 #12 of 41
Overall 80 62 58
  • SMID ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • MAS ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • CSL ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSMIDMASCSLSPY
1 month -12.4%+9.1%+6.9% -0.2%
3 months -27.4%-7.9%+0.5% +3.9%
6 months -36.2%+1.1%-2.2% +8.2%
Year to date -41.5%+18.4%+9.2% +12.9%
1 year -45.6%+10.0%+3.1% +12.3%
3 years +9.8%+47.2%+40.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +3.2%+13.8%+12.0% +23.3%
5 years +14.9%+14.7%+55.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +2.8%+2.8%+9.2% +10.9%
10 years +482.5%+146.4%+242.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +19.3%+9.4%+13.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSMIDMASCSLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.0%35.6%36.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.4%33.8%34.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.981.121.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.900.280.08 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.4%-38.9%-38.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.6%-9.2%-16.6% -1.2%
52-week high $39.82$82.77$418.74 $779.14
52-week low $21.20$58.60$295.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSMIDMASCSL
P/E now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 20.1x 16.9xmedian 20.1x 19.4xmedian 20.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.5x 1.9xmedian 1.5x 2.7xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 11.8x —median 11.8x 13.3xmedian 11.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.1xmedian 16.2x 13.2xmedian 16.2x 16.0xmedian 16.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.9x -40.6xmedian 2.9x 8.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.99 2.15median 0.99 2.39median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSMIDMASCSL
Revenue $89.50M $7.62B $5.10B
Gross profit $21.00M $2.82B $1.80B
Operating income $10.80M $1.34B $1.02B
Net income $7.73M $937.00M $724.50M
Free cash flow $4.17M $1.13B $866.60M
R&D – – $48.80M
EPS (diluted) $1.46 $4.45 $17.89
Cash & equivalents $10.66M $548.00M $665.30M
Total debt $17.45M $3.25B $2.88B
Shares (diluted) 5.31M 199.00M 40.50M
Enterprise value $63.69M $12.92B $10.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSMIDMASCSL
P/E 14.6x 16.9x 19.4x
P/FCF 27.1x 13.2x 16.0x
P/Operating cash flow 7.8x 11.5x 13.8x
P/S 1.3x 1.9x 2.7x
P/B 2.0x -40.6x 8.6x
P/Tangible book 3.5x -26.5x 54.7x
EV/EBITDA 7.4x – 13.3x
EV/EBIT 9.8x 13.1x 15.9x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 2.3x 3.2x
EV/FCF 25.5x 15.6x 18.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.3x 13.6x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 2.15 2.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSMIDMASCSL
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.6% -0.6% 1.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.4% -2.5% 1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -18.4% 1.4% -2.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 35.0% 1.7% 3.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -30.8% -0.7% -4.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 134.1% 2.1% 1.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -49.1% 9.7% -10.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 136.0% 3.0% 0.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -35.9% 16.6% -3.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 135.4% 7.9% 8.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 92.5% 33.0% 3.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 97.2% 5.0% -4.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 459.8% 39.2% 0.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 38.5% 10.8% -3.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSMIDMASCSL
Gross margin 23.5% 37.0% 35.3%
EBITDA margin 16.1% – 23.8%
Operating margin 12.1% 17.5% 19.9%
Pretax margin 12.0% 16.2% 18.6%
Net margin 8.6% 11.6% 14.2%
FCF margin 4.7% 14.8% 17.0%
Operating cash flow margin 16.3% 16.9% 19.8%
Return on equity 13.7% – 44.3%
Return on assets 8.6% 17.6% 11.9%
Return on invested capital 12.8% 33.9% 17.4%
Return on capital employed 13.8% 36.4% 19.4%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.4x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSMIDMASCSL
Debt / assets 4.8% 60.1% 46.3%
Debt / equity 0.1x -8.9x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – 1.8x
Debt / FCF 1.0x 2.9x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 34.2% 106.8% 74.1%
Equity / assets 65.8% -6.8% 25.9%
Interest coverage 48.9x 13.0x 9.7x
Current ratio 4.1x 1.9x 2.6x
Quick ratio 3.1x 1.1x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 5.00 3.87 5.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSMIDMASCSL
Dividend yield – 1.7% 1.3%
Net buyback yield – 6.1% 7.5%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 7.8% 8.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 27.5% 25.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 22.9% 21.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.0% 2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.3% 5.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSMIDMASCSL
Forward P/E – 15.7xFY2026 16.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.79FY2026 $21.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +21.0%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -7.5% +15.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.23BFY2026 $4.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -4.3%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.5% +18.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSMIDMASCSL
Held by institutions 57.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 56 921 795
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.1% +0.7% -1.1%
Institutions buying 23 497 367
Institutions selling 17 289 291
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.72 1.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SMIDMASCSL
SMID 1.00 0.31 0.26
MAS 0.31 1.00 0.68
CSL 0.26 0.68 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SMID, MAS and CSL?

Masco (MAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Smith Midland (SMID) $112.83M, Masco (MAS) $14.82B, Carlisle Companies (CSL) $13.90B.

Which stock is cheaper, SMID, MAS and CSL?

Smith Midland (SMID) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Smith Midland (SMID) 14.6x, Masco (MAS) 16.9x, Carlisle Companies (CSL) 19.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Masco (MAS) is cheapest (Masco (MAS) 15.7x, Carlisle Companies (CSL) 16.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Carlisle Companies (CSL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Smith Midland (SMID) -1.6%, Masco (MAS) -0.6%, Carlisle Companies (CSL) +1.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Carlisle Companies (CSL) has the highest net margin (Smith Midland (SMID) 8.6%, Masco (MAS) 11.6%, Carlisle Companies (CSL) 14.2%). On return on invested capital, Masco (MAS) leads (Smith Midland (SMID) 12.8%, Masco (MAS) 33.9%, Carlisle Companies (CSL) 17.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Masco (MAS) returned the most: Smith Midland (SMID) -45.6%, Masco (MAS) +10.0%, Carlisle Companies (CSL) +3.1%. Over five years, Carlisle Companies (CSL) compounded fastest (Smith Midland (SMID) +2.8%/yr, Masco (MAS) +2.8%/yr, Carlisle Companies (CSL) +9.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Masco (MAS) has the highest dividend yield: Smith Midland (SMID) 0.00%, Masco (MAS) 1.69%, Carlisle Companies (CSL) 1.30%. Smith Midland (SMID) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Masco (MAS) has been the steadiest (Smith Midland (SMID) 51.0%, Masco (MAS) 35.6%, Carlisle Companies (CSL) 36.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SMID, MAS and CSL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Masco (MAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.