SLVM vs SUZ vs MAGN Stock Comparison

Sylvamo, Suzano and Magnera Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SLVM Sylvamo Corp
$32.54 -11.2% 1M -25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.30B
P/E
17.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.30B
Div. yield
–
Pulp and Paper Basic Materials
3 wins
SUZ Suzano S.A.
$8.64 -6.3% 1M -4.6% 1Y
Market cap
$10.91B
P/E
7.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.04B
Div. yield
–
Pulp and Paper Basic Materials
5 wins
MAGN Magnera Corp
$11.94 +0.9% 1M +27.4% 1Y
Market cap
$429.36M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.28B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Suzano leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Suzano 5, Magnera 3, Sylvamo 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSLVMSUZMAGNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.30B $10.91B $429.36M SUZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.1x 7.0x -3.8x SUZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.7x 6.1x — SUZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -7.1% +0.7% +21.9% MAGN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.3% 17.2% -3.4% SUZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% 7.1% 2.2% SLVM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x 3.1x 5.1x SLVM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.2% -4.6% +27.4% MAGN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.3%/yr -1.5%/yr -43.8%/yr SLVM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.4% 29.8% 56.3% SUZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 57/100 66/100 MAGN

Percentile Scorecard

SLVMSUZMAGN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSLVMSUZMAGN
Valuation 86 #40 of 287 90 #29 of 287 93 #8 of 94
Growth 11 #239 of 267 17 #222 of 267 100 #1 of 92
Profitability 62 #91 of 240 77 #55 of 240 46 #49 of 89
Financial Health 27 #216 of 295 30 #207 of 295 24 #74 of 97
Shareholder Returns 97 #8 of 204 70 #62 of 204 –
Overall 57 57 66
  • SLVM ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials
  • SUZ ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials
  • MAGN ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSLVMSUZMAGNSPY
1 month -11.2%-6.3%+0.9% -1.0%
3 months -15.0%+4.3%-12.8% +2.9%
6 months -21.0%-5.1%+14.3% +6.4%
Year to date -32.4%-7.5%-21.1% +11.4%
1 year -25.2%-4.6%+27.4% +13.1%
3 years -23.0%-17.5%-40.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year -8.3%-6.2%-15.8% +21.5%
5 years +17.7%-7.1%-94.4% +67.7%
5 years, per year +3.3%-1.5%-43.8% +10.9%
10 years —+159.5%-95.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+10.0%-27.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureSLVMSUZMAGNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.4%29.8%56.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.4%27.9%48.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.610.631.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.160.49 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.4%-41.1%-96.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.6%-24.6%-21.8% -2.5%
52-week high $54.74$11.46$15.26 $779.14
52-week low $31.19$7.67$7.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSLVMSUZMAGN
P/E now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 17.9x 6.9xmedian 17.9x -3.8xmedian 21.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.8x 1.2xmedian 1.8x 0.1xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 9.8x 5.7xmedian 9.8x 6.5xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -117.7xmedian 16.0x 12.3xmedian 16.0x 3.8xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.8x 1.1xmedian 1.8x 0.4xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.49median 0.73 -0.19median 0.73 -0.07median 1.70

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSLVMSUZMAGN
Revenue $3.30B $9.04B $3.28B
Gross profit $679.00M $2.58B $392.00M
Operating income $261.00M $1.91B $63.00M
Net income $76.00M $1.56B -$112.00M
Free cash flow -$11.00M $888.28M $113.00M
EPS (diluted) $1.91 $1.25 $-3.12
Cash & equivalents $227.00M $3.21B $280.00M
Total debt $3.55B $17.89B $1.90B
Shares (diluted) 39.80M 1.24B 35.90M
Enterprise value $1.18B -$7.42B -$722.64M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSLVMSUZMAGN
P/E 17.0x 6.9x -3.8x
P/FCF -117.7x 12.3x 3.8x
P/Operating cash flow 6.2x 3.5x 2.5x
P/S 0.4x 1.2x 0.1x
P/B 1.4x 1.1x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.1x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA 4.9x 5.7x 6.5x
EV/EBIT 8.2x 12.4x 32.5x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 2.6x 0.6x
EV/FCF -194.2x 26.7x 18.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x 7.5x 11.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.49 -0.19 -0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSLVMSUZMAGN
Revenue growth (1Y) -7.1% 0.7% 21.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.2% -1.5% 30.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.7% -23.8% 37.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.8% -17.1% 43.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -32.2% -20.3% 2,646%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -23.2% -30.5% 44.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -65.1% 11.8% 17.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% -29.7% 5.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -64.0% 14.2% 17.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -35.0% -36.5% 56.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -49.5% -11.0% 762.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.7% -13.2% 126.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -105.7% -70.7% 399.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -27.1% -47.6% 66.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSLVMSUZMAGN
Gross margin 20.6% 28.6% 11.9%
EBITDA margin 13.3% 46.0% 9.6%
Operating margin 7.9% 21.1% 1.9%
Pretax margin 4.3% 25.9% -3.0%
Net margin 2.3% 17.2% -3.4%
FCF margin -0.3% 9.8% 3.4%
Operating cash flow margin 6.3% 34.8% 5.2%
Return on equity 7.9% 16.6% -10.9%
Return on assets 2.7% 4.8% -2.9%
Return on invested capital 7.4% 7.1% 2.2%
Return on capital employed 12.4% 6.4% 1.9%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.3x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x 2.0x -1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSLVMSUZMAGN
Debt / assets 33.5% 54.2% 49.6%
Debt / equity 1.0x 1.9x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x 3.1x 5.1x
Debt / FCF -87.6x 20.1x 16.8x
Liabilities / assets 66.8% 70.9% 73.5%
Equity / assets 33.2% 29.1% 26.5%
Interest coverage – 1.4x 0.4x
Current ratio 1.5x 3.4x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 2.3x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.9x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 3.20 1.03 1.18

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSLVMSUZMAGN
Dividend yield 5.5% 2.4% –
Net buyback yield 3.2% – –
Shareholder yield 8.8% 2.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSLVMSUZMAGN
Forward P/E 24.7xFY2026 6.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.32FY2026 $1.41FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -62.7%FY2026 -32.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +303.0% -28.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.45BFY2026 $10.38BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.0%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% +11.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSLVMSUZMAGN
Held by institutions 99.6% 5.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 335 136 176
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +0.6% +0.4%
Institutions buying 162 77 94
Institutions selling 88 46 42
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.67 2.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SLVMSUZMAGN
SLVM 1.00 0.28 0.31
SUZ 0.28 1.00 0.17
MAGN 0.31 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SLVM, SUZ and MAGN?

Suzano (SUZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sylvamo (SLVM) $1.30B, Suzano (SUZ) $10.91B, Magnera (MAGN) $429.36M.

Which stock is cheaper, SLVM, SUZ and MAGN?

Suzano (SUZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sylvamo (SLVM) 17.1x, Suzano (SUZ) 7.0x, Magnera (MAGN) -3.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Suzano (SUZ) is cheapest (Sylvamo (SLVM) 24.7x, Suzano (SUZ) 6.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Magnera (MAGN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sylvamo (SLVM) -7.1%, Suzano (SUZ) +0.7%, Magnera (MAGN) +21.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Suzano (SUZ) has the highest net margin (Sylvamo (SLVM) 2.3%, Suzano (SUZ) 17.2%, Magnera (MAGN) -3.4%). On return on invested capital, Sylvamo (SLVM) leads (Sylvamo (SLVM) 7.4%, Suzano (SUZ) 7.1%, Magnera (MAGN) 2.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magnera (MAGN) returned the most: Sylvamo (SLVM) -25.2%, Suzano (SUZ) -4.6%, Magnera (MAGN) +27.4%. Over five years, Sylvamo (SLVM) compounded fastest (Sylvamo (SLVM) +3.3%/yr, Suzano (SUZ) -1.5%/yr, Magnera (MAGN) -43.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Suzano (SUZ) has been the steadiest (Sylvamo (SLVM) 38.4%, Suzano (SUZ) 29.8%, Magnera (MAGN) 56.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SLVM, SUZ and MAGN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Suzano (SUZ) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.