SLI vs ABAT vs LAC Stock Comparison

Standard Lithium, American Battery Technology and Lithium Americas Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SLI Standard Lithium Ltd.
$1.50 -18.0% 1M -61.1% 1Y
Market cap
$359.56M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.02M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
4 wins
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.
$2.17 -19.0% 1M -62.6% 1Y
Market cap
$785.19M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Standard Lithium leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Standard Lithium 4, Lithium Americas 2, American Battery Technology 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSLIABATLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $359.56M $223.64M $785.19M LAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.5x -2.7x -27.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +575.1% +406.8% — SLI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -791.4% -337.5% — ABAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -61.1% -69.3% -62.6% SLI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -33.3%/yr -39.1%/yr — SLI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.5% 94.9% 66.6% LAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 29/100 — SLI

Percentile Scorecard

SLIABATLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSLIABATLAC
Valuation 35 #106 of 162 14 #140 of 162 94 #11 of 162
Growth 67 #49 of 147 36 #94 of 147 –
Profitability 17 #102 of 122 9 #111 of 122 –
Financial Health 80 #33 of 164 79 #36 of 164 45 #91 of 164
Shareholder Returns 96 #5 of 107 9 #98 of 107 –
Overall 59 29 –
  • SLI ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • ABAT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LAC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSLIABATLACSPY
1 month -18.0%-30.4%-19.0% +0.9%
3 months -22.3%-22.9%-19.9% +5.9%
6 months -59.5%-48.7%-56.2% +8.5%
Year to date -66.4%-52.7%-50.2% +13.3%
1 year -61.1%-69.3%-62.6% +12.4%
3 years -45.3%-62.7%-68.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year -18.2%-28.1%-31.8% +23.5%
5 years -86.8%-91.6%— +68.2%
5 years, per year -33.3%-39.1%— +11.0%
10 years —-70.7%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —-11.6%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSLIABATLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.5%94.9%66.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.7%91.4%64.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.183.582.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.91-0.73-0.94 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.5%-97.0%-82.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.5%-70.5%-66.3% -0.9%
52-week high $5.65$5.35$6.44 $779.14
52-week low $1.38$1.28$2.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSLIABATLAC
P/E now vs peer median -6.5xmedian 13.4x -2.7xmedian 13.4x -27.0xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 59.7xmedian 3.2x 10.3xmedian 3.2x —median 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.3x -2.6xmedian 7.3x —median 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -24.6xmedian 14.8x -5.9xmedian 14.8x —median 14.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.3x 1.8xmedian 2.3x 0.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.31 0.64median 0.31 —median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSLIABATLAC
Revenue $6.02M $21.74M –
Gross profit – -$3.09M –
Operating income -$22.81M -$74.71M –
Net income -$47.66M -$73.38M -$73.07M
Free cash flow -$14.63M -$37.81M –
R&D – $17.87M -$1.00K
EPS (diluted) $-0.23 $-0.58 $-0.07
Cash & equivalents $137.30M $49.52M $822.78M
Total debt – $8.00M $988.02M
Shares (diluted) 206.37M 127.58M 401.74M
Enterprise value -$310.44M $56.01M -$967.53M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSLIABATLAC
P/E -6.5x -2.7x -27.0x
P/FCF -24.6x -5.9x –
P/Operating cash flow -24.6x -9.2x –
P/S 59.7x 10.3x –
P/B 1.0x 1.8x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 1.8x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA – -2.6x –
EV/EBIT -7.5x -2.4x –
EV/Revenue 28.3x 8.4x –
EV/FCF -11.7x -4.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow -11.7x -7.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.64 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSLIABATLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 575.1% 406.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 70.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -363.9% -77.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -49.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 69.6% -56.9% -33.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -49.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 72.6% 1.2% 63.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -4.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.4% 16.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -21.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 32.6% -20.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 8.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSLIABATLAC
Gross margin – -14.2% –
EBITDA margin – -320.6% –
Operating margin -378.8% -343.6% –
Pretax margin -867.8% -339.1% –
Net margin -791.4% -337.5% –
FCF margin -242.9% -173.9% –
Operating cash flow margin -242.6% -111.4% –
Return on equity -13.0% -61.7% –
Return on assets -12.1% -58.5% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -5.9% -62.4% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 104.0% 213.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSLIABATLAC
Debt / assets – 6.0% 27.9%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.6x –
Debt / FCF – -0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 7.1% 4.9% 44.9%
Equity / assets 92.9% 95.1% 55.1%
Interest coverage -950.4x -76.2x –
Current ratio 17.9x 9.5x 5.5x
Quick ratio 23.6x 8.9x 3.5x
Cash ratio 23.3x 7.7x 3.5x
Altman Z-score 7.57 16.08 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSLIABATLAC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 3.8% -34.2% –
Shareholder yield 3.8% -34.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSLIABATLAC
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.08FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $0.00FY2026

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSLIABATLAC
Held by institutions 31.0% 36.6% 30.8%
Institutions holding 137 176 274
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.1% +5.9% -0.6%
Institutions buying 60 102 149
Institutions selling 33 33 57
Buyers to sellers 1.82 3.09 2.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SLIABATLAC
SLI 1.00 0.54 0.73
ABAT 0.54 1.00 0.68
LAC 0.73 0.68 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SLI, ABAT and LAC?

Lithium Americas (LAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Standard Lithium (SLI) $359.56M, American Battery Technology (ABAT) $223.64M, Lithium Americas (LAC) $785.19M.

Which company is growing faster?

Standard Lithium (SLI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Standard Lithium (SLI) +575.1%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) +406.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

American Battery Technology (ABAT) has the highest net margin (Standard Lithium (SLI) -791.4%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -337.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Standard Lithium (SLI) returned the most: Standard Lithium (SLI) -61.1%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -69.3%, Lithium Americas (LAC) -62.6%. Over five years, Standard Lithium (SLI) compounded fastest (Standard Lithium (SLI) -33.3%/yr, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -39.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lithium Americas (LAC) has been the steadiest (Standard Lithium (SLI) 67.5%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) 94.9%, Lithium Americas (LAC) 66.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SLI, ABAT and LAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Standard Lithium (SLI) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.