SLB vs STX vs BKR Stock Comparison

Slb, Seagate Technology Holdings and Baker Hughes Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SLB Slb Limited/Nv
$54.08 +4.9% 1M +49.6% 1Y
Market cap
$80.14B
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.37B
Div. yield
–
Oilfield Services Energy
1 win
BKR Baker Hughes Co
$59.00 +2.0% 1M +26.6% 1Y
Market cap
$54.38B
P/E
18.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.74B
Div. yield
–
Oilfield Services Energy
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Seagate Technology Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Seagate Technology Holdings 5, Baker Hughes 2, Slb 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSLBSTXBKRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $80.14B $152.10B $54.38B STX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.8x 34.6x 18.8x BKR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.5x 17.3x 23.2x STX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.5% +44.4% +3.7% STX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.5% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +49.6% +190.0% +26.6% STX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.2%/yr +49.5%/yr +18.4%/yr STX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.6% 75.9% 33.6% BKR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 57/100 46/100 SLB

Percentile Scorecard

SLBSTXBKR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSLBSTXBKR
Valuation 28 #34 of 47 24 #85 of 112 24 #36 of 47
Growth 45 #24 of 43 99 #2 of 109 64 #16 of 43
Profitability 85 #7 of 40 93 #8 of 104 62 #16 of 40
Financial Health 57 #20 of 45 25 #87 of 116 –
Shareholder Returns 81 #7 of 32 43 #47 of 81 36 #21 of 32
Overall 59 57 46
  • SLB ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • STX ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • BKR ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSLBSTXBKRSPY
1 month +4.9%-27.2%+2.0% -0.2%
3 months +8.2%-10.6%+0.9% +3.9%
6 months -2.8%+15.3%-12.8% +8.2%
Year to date +40.9%+142.5%+29.6% +12.9%
1 year +49.6%+190.0%+26.6% +12.3%
3 years -3.1%+879.3%+69.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -1.1%+114.1%+19.2% +23.3%
5 years +62.4%+645.8%+132.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year +10.2%+49.5%+18.4% +10.9%
10 years -32.1%+1,850.5%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -3.8%+34.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSLBSTXBKRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.6%75.9%33.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.4%76.2%34.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.742.520.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.352.500.79 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.9%-58.2%-47.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.0%-39.0%-15.3% -1.2%
52-week high $60.12$1,094.04$69.67 $779.14
52-week low $35.19$223.00$44.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSLBSTXBKR
P/E now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 26.1x 33.3xmedian 33.2x 20.2xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.3x 11.0xmedian 2.8x 2.0xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 8.8x —median 20.0x —median 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 14.9x 69.1xmedian 29.8x 17.7xmedian 14.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.7x 43.9xmedian 3.0x 2.8xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -2.89median 0.49 0.35median 1.17 0.98median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSLBSTXBKR
Revenue $36.37B $13.80B $28.74B
Gross profit $6.01B – –
Operating income $4.68B $5.46B –
Net income $3.15B $4.40B $2.93B
Free cash flow $4.81B – –
R&D $692.00M $769.00M $573.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.06 $19.20 $2.91
Cash & equivalents $2.74B $1.26B $4.07B
Total debt $12.80B – –
Shares (diluted) 1.51B 229.00M 997.00M
Enterprise value $76.07B $152.10B $54.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSLBSTXBKR
P/E 26.0x 33.3x 20.2x
P/FCF 16.7x 69.1x 17.7x
P/Operating cash flow 12.3x 31.3x 13.0x
P/S 2.2x 11.0x 2.0x
P/B 2.9x 43.9x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 43.9x 5.4x
EV/EBITDA 12.0x – –
EV/EBIT 19.0x – –
EV/Revenue 2.4x 11.0x 2.0x
EV/FCF 18.5x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.6x 31.3x 13.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.89 0.35 0.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSLBSTXBKR
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.5% 44.4% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 26.6% 5.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -15.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.5% 150.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.2% 125.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -25.2% 156.6% 0.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -7.6% 99.4% 19.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -31.3% 153.3% -0.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -9.0% 94.7% 20.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% 217.9% 35.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 80.3% 14.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 0.1% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.2% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSLBSTXBKR
Gross margin 16.5% – –
EBITDA margin 20.5% – –
Operating margin 12.9% – –
Pretax margin 10.8% – –
Net margin 8.5% – –
FCF margin 13.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 18.0% 35.0% 15.7%
Return on equity 11.5% 156.4% 14.4%
Return on assets 5.7% 43.3% 5.2%
Return on invested capital 9.5% – –
Return on capital employed 11.4% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.1x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 1.7% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSLBSTXBKR
Debt / assets 23.0% – –
Debt / equity 0.5x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x – –
Debt / FCF 2.7x – –
Liabilities / assets 50.9% 66.6% –
Equity / assets 49.1% 33.4% 34.8%
Interest coverage 9.1x – –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.8x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.9x – –
Cash ratio 0.3x – –
Altman Z-score 3.24 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSLBSTXBKR
Dividend yield 2.1% 0.4% 1.6%
Net buyback yield 1.1% – –
Shareholder yield 3.2% 0.4% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSLBSTXBKR
Forward P/E 21.5xFY2026 17.3xFY2027 23.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.52FY2026 $38.53FY2027 $2.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -14.0%FY2026 +147.3%FY2027 -2.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.1% +63.8% +10.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $38.38BFY2026 $19.55BFY2027 $30.90BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.5%FY2026 +60.2%FY2027 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.5% +29.7% -1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSLBSTXBKR
Held by institutions 89.8% 83.8% 97.3%
Institutions holding 1,698 1,955 1,148
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +1.4% +5.2%
Institutions buying 783 1,207 576
Institutions selling 663 590 429
Buyers to sellers 1.18 2.05 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SLBSTXBKR
SLB 1.00 0.10 0.68
STX 0.10 1.00 0.23
BKR 0.68 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SLB, STX and BKR?

Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Slb (SLB) $80.14B, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) $152.10B, Baker Hughes (BKR) $54.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, SLB, STX and BKR?

Baker Hughes (BKR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Slb (SLB) 25.8x, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) 34.6x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 18.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) is cheapest (Slb (SLB) 21.5x, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) 17.3x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 23.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Slb (SLB) +2.5%, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) +44.4%, Baker Hughes (BKR) +3.7%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) returned the most: Slb (SLB) +49.6%, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) +190.0%, Baker Hughes (BKR) +26.6%. Over five years, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) compounded fastest (Slb (SLB) +10.2%/yr, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) +49.5%/yr, Baker Hughes (BKR) +18.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Baker Hughes (BKR) has been the steadiest (Slb (SLB) 36.6%, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) 75.9%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 33.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SLB, STX and BKR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.