SKT vs FRT vs KIM Stock Comparison

Tanger, Federal Realty Investment Trust and Kimco Realty Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SKT Tanger Inc.
$37.01 +6.1% 1M +12.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.20B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
–
Retail REITs Real Estate
5 wins
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$24.41 +8.9% 1M +14.1% 1Y
Market cap
$16.29B
P/E
22.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.20B
Div. yield
0.05%
Retail REITs Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Tanger leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Tanger 5, Federal Realty Investment Trust 3, Kimco Realty 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSKTFRTKIMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.20B $9.47B $16.29B KIM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.0x 22.1x 22.7x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 33.6x 25.5x 30.1x FRT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.4% +8.0% +3.5% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.3% 32.1% 32.7% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 4.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 4.5x 5.2x SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.05% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.2% +16.8% +14.1% FRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.1%/yr -1.5%/yr +1.6%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.1% 16.7% 18.3% FRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 41/100 68/100 KIM

Percentile Scorecard

SKTFRTKIM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSKTFRTKIM
Valuation 69 #46 of 145 14 #125 of 145 53 #69 of 145
Growth 78 #33 of 143 47 #76 of 143 76 #35 of 143
Profitability 98 #4 of 136 82 #25 of 136 79 #30 of 136
Financial Health 46 #75 of 138 43 #79 of 138 63 #52 of 138
Shareholder Returns 11 #117 of 131 21 #104 of 131 69 #42 of 131
Overall 60 41 68
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • FRT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSKTFRTKIMSPY
1 month +6.1%+1.9%+8.9% +0.7%
3 months -9.7%-10.2%-4.3% +3.7%
6 months -0.2%+0.6%+3.3% +7.1%
Year to date +10.9%+10.6%+20.4% +12.8%
1 year +12.2%+16.8%+14.1% +11.9%
3 years +72.1%+27.1%+41.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +19.9%+8.3%+12.2% +22.8%
5 years +120.3%-7.3%+8.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +17.1%-1.5%+1.6% +10.9%
10 years +7.9%-22.4%-7.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year +0.8%-2.5%-0.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSKTFRTKIMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.1%16.7%18.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 19.3%15.4%16.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.230.110.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.581.010.77 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.8%-40.0%-37.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.1%-12.3%-7.5% -1.2%
52-week high $42.10$127.13$26.39 $779.14
52-week low $31.63$94.87$19.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSKTFRTKIM
P/E now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 25.7x 22.4xmedian 25.7x 22.6xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 4.1x 7.3xmedian 4.1x 7.4xmedian 4.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 14.3x 13.9xmedian 14.3x 15.7xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 23.5x -26.1xmedian 23.5x 24.7xmedian 23.5x
P/B now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 1.3x 2.8xmedian 1.3x 1.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.96median 1.86 10.94median 1.86 1.54median 1.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSKTFRTKIM
Revenue $612.31M $1.34B $2.20B
Operating income – $638.97M $881.20M
Net income $246.96M $446.74M $755.69M
Free cash flow $323.28M -$371.04M $657.16M
EPS (diluted) $2.13 $4.97 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $176.88M $107.25M $544.92M
Total debt $1.62B $19.28B $8.47B
Shares (diluted) 115.73M 86.18M 669.19M
Enterprise value $3.75B $9.03B $14.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSKTFRTKIM
P/E 17.2x 22.4x 22.6x
P/FCF 13.2x -26.1x 24.7x
P/Operating cash flow 7.1x 15.4x 13.1x
P/S 6.9x 7.3x 7.4x
P/B 6.1x 2.8x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 6.1x 2.8x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 12.3x 13.9x 15.7x
EV/EBIT 19.2x 22.5x 27.4x
EV/Revenue 9.3x 10.7x 11.0x
EV/FCF 17.5x -38.7x 36.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.5x 22.7x 19.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.96 10.94 1.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSKTFRTKIM
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.4% 8.0% 3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 6.4% 7.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 21.5% 19.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 5.5% 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.3% 24.7% 24.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 4.0% 16.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 19.5% 27.3% 28.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.8% 2.1% 14.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% 6.3% 12.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 4.8% 6.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.7% -323.9% 39.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% -17.8% 19.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSKTFRTKIM
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 75.4% 77.2% 70.0%
Operating margin – 47.9% 40.1%
Pretax margin 36.4% 33.4% 27.1%
Net margin 40.3% 32.1% 32.7%
FCF margin 52.8% -27.8% 29.9%
Operating cash flow margin 97.5% 47.3% 56.3%
Return on equity 18.9% 13.1% 7.3%
Return on assets 4.6% 4.9% 3.8%
Return on invested capital – – 4.6%
Return on capital employed – – 4.4%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 1.4x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 4.3% 1.1% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSKTFRTKIM
Debt / assets 56.6% 52.6% 43.0%
Debt / equity 2.3x 1.4x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 4.5x 5.2x
Debt / FCF 5.0x -12.9x 12.9x
Liabilities / assets 75.5% 62.1% 47.7%
Equity / assets 24.5% 37.9% 52.3%
Interest coverage 4.1x 3.3x 2.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – 13.7x
Cash ratio – – 8.0x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSKTFRTKIM
Dividend yield 3.3% 4.1% 4.3%
Net buyback yield -1.2% -0.6% 2.4%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 3.5% 6.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 98.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 113.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSKTFRTKIM
Forward P/E 33.6xFY2026 25.5xFY2026 30.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.10FY2026 $4.38FY2026 $0.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.1%FY2026 -6.4%FY2026 -1.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.0% -31.5% +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $638.63MFY2026 $1.28BFY2026 $2.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.9%FY2026 +2.5%FY2026 +0.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.1% +14.8% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSKTFRTKIM
Held by institutions 93.8% 98.5% 99.4%
Institutions holding 362 622 694
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +9.4% +1.8%
Institutions buying 173 364 369
Institutions selling 122 162 202
Buyers to sellers 1.42 2.25 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SKTFRTKIM
SKT 1.00 0.65 0.68
FRT 0.65 1.00 0.76
KIM 0.68 0.76 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SKT, FRT and KIM?

Kimco Realty (KIM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tanger (SKT) $4.20B, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) $9.47B, Kimco Realty (KIM) $16.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, SKT, FRT and KIM?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tanger (SKT) 17.0x, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 22.1x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 22.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is cheapest (Tanger (SKT) 33.6x, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 25.5x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 30.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tanger (SKT) +11.4%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +8.0%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Tanger (SKT) 40.3%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 32.1%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) returned the most: Tanger (SKT) +12.2%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +16.8%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +14.1%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Tanger (SKT) +17.1%/yr, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) -1.5%/yr, Kimco Realty (KIM) +1.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Tanger (SKT) 0.00%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 0.00%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 0.05%. Tanger (SKT) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has been the steadiest (Tanger (SKT) 21.1%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 16.7%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SKT, FRT and KIM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tanger (SKT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.