SIFY vs SLB vs WULF Stock Comparison

Sify Technologies, Slb and Terawulf Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SIFY Sify Technologies Ltd
$12.30 -7.9% 1M +1.6% 1Y
Market cap
$890.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$384.50M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
2 wins
SLB Slb Limited/Nv
$54.08 +4.9% 1M +49.6% 1Y
Market cap
$80.26B
P/E
26.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.37B
Div. yield
2.14%
Oilfield Services Energy
8 wins
WULF Terawulf Inc.
$12.66 -19.6% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.32B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$165.19M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Slb leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Slb 8, Sify Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSIFYSLBWULFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $890.95M $80.26B $6.32B SLB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -57.6x 26.0x -3.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 615.0x 21.5x — SLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.7% +2.5% +4.1% SIFY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.0% 8.5% -1,179.9% SLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.4% 9.5% -9.2% SLB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -9.4x 1.2x -8.4x SIFY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 2.14% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.6% +49.6% -7.2% SLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.8%/yr +10.2%/yr -14.7%/yr SLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.0% 36.6% 92.8% SLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 59/100 11/100 SLB

Percentile Scorecard

SIFYSLBWULF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSIFYSLBWULF
Valuation 68 #13 of 38 28 #34 of 47 3 #37 of 38
Growth 31 #25 of 36 45 #24 of 43 6 #34 of 36
Profitability 61 #14 of 34 85 #7 of 40 6 #32 of 34
Financial Health – 57 #20 of 45 27 #28 of 38
Shareholder Returns – 81 #7 of 32 15 #18 of 21
Overall 53 59 11
  • SIFY ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • SLB ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • WULF ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSIFYSLBWULFSPY
1 month -7.9%+4.9%-19.6% -0.2%
3 months -13.1%+8.2%-25.9% +3.9%
6 months -18.8%-2.8%-39.1% +8.2%
Year to date +0.9%+40.9%+10.2% +12.9%
1 year +1.6%+49.6%-7.2% +12.3%
3 years +41.4%-3.1%+1,030.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +12.2%-1.1%+124.5% +23.3%
5 years -40.2%+62.4%-54.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -9.8%+10.2%-14.7% +10.9%
10 years +95.2%-32.1%+17.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +6.9%-3.8%+1.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSIFYSLBWULFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.0%36.6%92.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.0%33.4%90.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.130.743.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.031.35-0.08 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.8%-48.9%-98.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.7%-10.0%-56.3% -1.2%
52-week high $17.24$60.12$28.98 $779.14
52-week low $10.37$35.19$10.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSIFYSLBWULF
P/E now vs peer median -57.6xmedian 29.5x 26.0xmedian 26.1x -3.2xmedian 29.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 4.5x 2.2xmedian 1.3x 38.2xmedian 4.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -23.3xmedian 23.9x 12.0xmedian 8.8x -28.8xmedian 23.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.0x 16.7xmedian 14.9x -2.3xmedian 15.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 4.3x 2.9xmedian 1.7x 42.8xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.16median 0.38 -2.89median 0.49 0.03median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSIFYSLBWULF
Revenue $384.50M $36.37B $165.19M
Gross profit $206.52M $6.01B $114.42M
Operating income $39.31M $4.68B -$413.59M
Net income -$15.57M $3.15B -$1.95B
Free cash flow – $4.81B -$2.74B
R&D – $692.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.21 $2.06 $-4.01
Cash & equivalents – $2.74B $2.62B
Total debt $599.45M $12.80B $5.21B
Shares (diluted) 72.46M 1.51B 485.73M
Enterprise value $890.95M $77.37B -$2.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSIFYSLBWULF
P/E -57.6x 26.0x -3.2x
P/FCF – 16.7x -2.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.3x -22.6x
P/S 2.3x 2.2x 38.2x
P/B 4.4x 2.9x 42.8x
P/Tangible book 4.4x 3.6x 42.9x
EV/EBITDA -23.3x 12.0x -28.8x
EV/EBIT 37.9x 19.0x -21.5x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 2.4x 53.9x
EV/FCF – 18.5x -3.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.6x -31.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.16 -2.89 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSIFYSLBWULF
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.7% 2.5% 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -65.1% 5.3% 59.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.2% -15.3% 47.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 65.9% -0.2% 79.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.9% -16.5% -190.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -10.7% -2.2% -114.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.3% -25.2% -942.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -73.4% -7.6% -166.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 31.2% -31.3% -728.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -49.8% -9.0% -101.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.6% -350.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% -141.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 0.1% -508.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 21.2% -276.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSIFYSLBWULF
Gross margin 53.7% 16.5% 69.3%
EBITDA margin -16.7% 20.5% -187.4%
Operating margin 10.2% 12.9% -250.4%
Pretax margin 3.1% 10.8% -1,164%
Net margin -4.0% 8.5% -1,180%
FCF margin – 13.2% -1,656%
Operating cash flow margin – 18.0% -169.0%
Return on equity -10.8% 11.5% -5,567%
Return on assets – 5.7% -25.8%
Return on invested capital 5.4% 9.5% -9.2%
Return on capital employed – 11.4% -11.0%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.9% 118.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSIFYSLBWULF
Debt / assets – 23.0% 64.8%
Debt / equity 3.0x 0.5x 35.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -9.4x 1.2x -8.4x
Debt / FCF – 2.7x -1.9x
Liabilities / assets – 50.9% 98.2%
Equity / assets – 49.1% 1.8%
Interest coverage 2.0x 9.1x -2.1x
Current ratio – 1.4x 0.7x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 3.24 -0.22

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSIFYSLBWULF
Dividend yield – 2.1% –
Net buyback yield – 1.1% -19.2%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.2% -19.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSIFYSLBWULF
Forward P/E 615.0xFY2026 21.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.02FY2026 $2.52FY2026 $-3.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -14.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +150.0% +17.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $765.58MFY2026 $38.38BFY2026 $247.09MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.7%FY2026 +7.5%FY2026 +46.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +30.6% +0.5% +255.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSIFYSLBWULF
Held by institutions 4.6% 89.8% 79.4%
Institutions holding 42 1,698 495
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +1.6% +25.2%
Institutions buying 27 783 307
Institutions selling 4 663 137
Buyers to sellers 6.75 1.18 2.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SIFYSLBWULF
SIFY 1.00 0.17 0.32
SLB 0.17 1.00 0.17
WULF 0.32 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SIFY, SLB and WULF?

Slb (SLB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sify Technologies (SIFY) $890.95M, Slb (SLB) $80.26B, Terawulf (WULF) $6.32B.

Which company is growing faster?

Sify Technologies (SIFY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sify Technologies (SIFY) +5.7%, Slb (SLB) +2.5%, Terawulf (WULF) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Slb (SLB) has the highest net margin (Sify Technologies (SIFY) -4.0%, Slb (SLB) 8.5%, Terawulf (WULF) -1,179.9%). On return on invested capital, Slb (SLB) leads (Sify Technologies (SIFY) 5.4%, Slb (SLB) 9.5%, Terawulf (WULF) -9.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Slb (SLB) returned the most: Sify Technologies (SIFY) +1.6%, Slb (SLB) +49.6%, Terawulf (WULF) -7.2%. Over five years, Slb (SLB) compounded fastest (Sify Technologies (SIFY) -9.8%/yr, Slb (SLB) +10.2%/yr, Terawulf (WULF) -14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Sify Technologies (SIFY) 0.00%, Slb (SLB) 2.14%, Terawulf (WULF) 0.00%. Sify Technologies (SIFY) and Terawulf (WULF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Slb (SLB) has been the steadiest (Sify Technologies (SIFY) 61.0%, Slb (SLB) 36.6%, Terawulf (WULF) 92.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SIFY, SLB and WULF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Slb (SLB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.