SGHC vs FLL vs CDRO Stock Comparison

Super Group (SGHC), Full House Resorts and Codere Online Luxembourg Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Ltd
$10.52 -10.2% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.38B
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.43B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
FLL Full House Resorts Inc
$0.86 -46.3% 1M -67.8% 1Y
Market cap
$29.56M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$305.86M
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Super Group (SGHC) leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Super Group (SGHC) 8, Codere Online Luxembourg 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSGHCFLLCDROLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.38B $29.56M $390.12M SGHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.5x -0.8x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.2x — 27.4x SGHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.3% +2.8% — SGHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.2% -12.1% — SGHC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 39.5% 1.5% — SGHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 8.3x — SGHC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.5% -67.8% +48.6% CDRO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.2%/yr -38.7%/yr -1.9%/yr SGHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.7% 64.4% 32.3% CDRO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 87/100 43/100 — SGHC

Percentile Scorecard

SGHCFLLCDRO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSGHCFLLCDRO
Valuation 70 #14 of 44 74 #12 of 44 –
Growth 98 #2 of 43 83 #8 of 43 –
Profitability 100 #1 of 42 37 #27 of 42 –
Financial Health 98 #2 of 47 15 #40 of 47 83 #9 of 47
Shareholder Returns 70 #9 of 28 7 #26 of 28 –
Overall 87 43 –
  • SGHC ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • FLL ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • CDRO ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSGHCFLLCDROSPY
1 month -10.2%-46.3%-7.7% +0.9%
3 months -29.3%-62.6%-2.4% +5.9%
6 months -17.7%-64.5%+0.8% +8.5%
Year to date -12.0%-67.0%+12.7% +13.3%
1 year -7.5%-67.8%+48.6% +12.4%
3 years +198.9%-76.2%+198.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +44.1%-38.0%+44.0% +23.5%
5 years -6.0%-91.4%-9.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year -1.2%-38.7%-1.9% +11.0%
10 years —-47.2%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —-6.2%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSGHCFLLCDROSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.7%64.4%32.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.5%64.1%30.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.630.920.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.17-1.051.51 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.5%-93.2%-79.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.5%-74.1%-11.3% -0.9%
52-week high $15.58$3.32$10.20 $779.14
52-week low $8.52$0.84$5.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSGHCFLLCDRO
P/E now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 16.8x -0.8xmedian 16.8x —median 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.9x 0.1xmedian 1.9x —median 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 10.2x 8.9xmedian 10.2x —median 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.2x 8.0xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 2.2x -2.4xmedian 2.2x 9.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.21median 0.44 0.10median 0.44 —median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSGHCFLLCDRO
Revenue $2.43B $305.86M –
Gross profit – $157.64M –
Operating income – $7.08M –
Net income $372.40M -$36.89M –
Free cash flow – $3.96M –
EPS (diluted) $0.73 $-1.01 –
Cash & equivalents $548.00M $33.41M $71.43M
Total debt $26.00M $1.89B –
Shares (diluted) 507.84M 36.45M 45.89M
Enterprise value $3.43B -$106.81M $118.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSGHCFLLCDRO
P/E 14.4x -0.8x –
P/FCF – 8.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – 2.2x –
P/S 2.2x 0.1x –
P/B 6.4x -2.4x 9.4x
P/Tangible book 10.5x -0.3x 9.4x
EV/EBITDA 7.7x 8.9x –
EV/EBIT 10.7x 66.1x –
EV/Revenue 2.0x 1.5x –
EV/FCF – 118.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 32.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.21 0.10 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSGHCFLLCDRO
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.3% 2.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.5% 17.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 315.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 43.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 174.9% 9.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 70.3% -10.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 172.1% 10.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 69.8% -8.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 539.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 97.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 117.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSGHCFLLCDRO
Gross margin – 51.5% –
EBITDA margin 25.5% 17.2% –
Operating margin – 2.3% –
Pretax margin 18.3% -11.8% –
Net margin 15.2% -12.1% –
FCF margin – 1.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 4.7% –
Return on equity 47.9% – –
Return on assets 28.7% -5.9% –
Return on invested capital 39.5% 1.5% –
Return on capital employed 35.6% 1.3% –
Asset turnover 1.9x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.7% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSGHCFLLCDRO
Debt / assets 1.9% 74.5% –
Debt / equity 0.0x -35.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.8x 8.3x –
Debt / FCF – 118.5x –
Liabilities / assets 39.2% 102.1% 61.1%
Equity / assets 60.8% -2.1% 38.9%
Interest coverage 149.0x 0.2x –
Current ratio – 0.6x 1.5x
Quick ratio 17.8x 0.4x 1.5x
Cash ratio 13.0x 0.4x 1.3x
Altman Z-score – 0.20 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSGHCFLLCDRO
Dividend yield 4.2% – –
Net buyback yield – -0.9% –
Shareholder yield 4.2% -0.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSGHCFLLCDRO
Forward P/E 13.2xFY2026 – 27.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.80FY2026 $-0.86FY2026 $0.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +86.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +23.7% – +84.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.52BFY2026 $294.72MFY2026 $304.93MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 -2.5%FY2026 +15.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.9% +17.9% -4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSGHCFLLCDRO
Held by institutions 23.8% 38.2% 12.2%
Institutions holding 196 65 20
Change in shares held, QoQ +21.4% +0.7% +0.4%
Institutions buying 118 33 10
Institutions selling 59 15 4
Buyers to sellers 2.00 2.20 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SGHCFLLCDRO
SGHC 1.00 0.18 0.05
FLL 0.18 1.00 0.10
CDRO 0.05 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SGHC, FLL and CDRO?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) $5.38B, Full House Resorts (FLL) $29.56M, Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) $390.12M.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) +17.3%, Full House Resorts (FLL) +2.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) has the highest net margin (Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 15.2%, Full House Resorts (FLL) -12.1%). On return on invested capital, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads (Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 39.5%, Full House Resorts (FLL) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) returned the most: Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) -7.5%, Full House Resorts (FLL) -67.8%, Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) +48.6%. Over five years, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) compounded fastest (Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) -1.2%/yr, Full House Resorts (FLL) -38.7%/yr, Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) -1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) has been the steadiest (Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) 43.7%, Full House Resorts (FLL) 64.4%, Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) 32.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SGHC, FLL and CDRO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.