SFL vs ECO vs CMBT Stock Comparison

Sfl, Okeanis Eco Tankers and Cmb.Tech Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SFL SFL Corp Ltd.
$12.76 -0.2% 1M +81.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.69B
P/E
26.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
1 win
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
$96.86 +24.4% 1M +198.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.03B
P/E
7.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$706.47M
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
6 wins
CMBT Cmb.Tech Nv
$18.35 -3.4% 1M +96.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.17B
P/E
4.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.89B
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Okeanis Eco Tankers leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Okeanis Eco Tankers 6, Cmb.Tech 3, Sfl 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSFLECOCMBTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.69B $3.03B $4.17B CMBT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.0x 7.5x 4.9x CMBT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.2x 5.5x 7.2x ECO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +105.2% +84.9% ECO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 56.9% 29.6% ECO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.1x 1.0x 4.8x ECO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +81.3% +198.0% +96.7% ECO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.7%/yr — +11.3%/yr CMBT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.1% 45.9% 40.3% SFL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 82/100 61/100 ECO

Percentile Scorecard

SFLECOCMBT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSFLECOCMBT
Valuation 31 #94 of 136 42 #79 of 136 59 #57 of 136
Growth 56 #54 of 122 100 #1 of 122 94 #8 of 122
Profitability – 100 #1 of 116 76 #29 of 116
Financial Health 6 #135 of 144 71 #42 of 144 16 #121 of 144
Shareholder Returns 90 #9 of 82 96 #4 of 82 62 #32 of 82
Overall 46 82 61
  • SFL ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • ECO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CMBT ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSFLECOCMBTSPY
1 month -0.2%+24.4%-3.4% -0.8%
3 months +6.9%+67.8%+19.4% +3.5%
6 months +14.2%+78.6%+39.3% +7.0%
Year to date +63.4%+186.2%+90.2% +12.2%
1 year +81.3%+198.0%+96.7% +13.0%
3 years +18.0%+252.3%+2.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.7%+52.2%+0.9% +23.1%
5 years +58.7%—+70.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +9.7%—+11.3% +11.0%
10 years -4.3%—+135.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year -0.4%—+8.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSFLECOCMBTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.1%45.9%40.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.2%44.0%37.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.380.300.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.614.322.40 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.6%-49.0%-62.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.1%-2.4%-12.3% -1.8%
52-week high $13.74$99.28$20.92 $779.14
52-week low $7.03$31.96$9.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSFLECOCMBT
P/E now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 16.1x 7.8xmedian 16.1x 4.9xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.0x 4.9xmedian 1.0x 2.0xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 8.7x 8.1xmedian 8.7x 10.0xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.5x 9.5xmedian 11.5x 7.4xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.2x 3.9xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.45median 0.81 —median 0.81 0.42median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSFLECOCMBT
Revenue – $706.47M $2.89B
Gross profit – $657.71M $2.22B
Operating income – $440.43M $1.21B
Net income $64.88M $402.14M $839.57M
Free cash flow – $360.91M $787.73M
EPS (diluted) $0.49 $12.34 $3.73
Cash & equivalents $113.10M $222.59M $151.57M
Total debt $2.38B $2.67B $5.45B
Shares (diluted) 133.06M 32.58M 229.44M
Enterprise value -$144.44B $2.51B $3.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSFLECOCMBT
P/E 26.2x 7.8x 4.9x
P/FCF – 9.5x 7.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.5x 7.4x
P/S – 4.9x 2.0x
P/B 1.8x 3.9x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 3.9x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 8.1x 10.0x
EV/EBIT 29.1x 8.9x 9.1x
EV/Revenue – 5.6x 3.8x
EV/FCF – 10.9x 14.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 10.9x 14.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.45 – 0.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSFLECOCMBT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 105.2% 84.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 31.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 118.4% 80.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 30.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 288.4% 146.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 20.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 82.4% 498.6% 274.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -18.9% – 12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 78.2% 491.6% -20.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -18.0% – 11.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 316.0% 184.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 316.0% 184.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSFLECOCMBT
Gross margin – 93.1% 76.7%
EBITDA margin – 69.0% 38.5%
Operating margin – 62.3% 42.0%
Pretax margin – 67.0% 28.5%
Net margin – 56.9% 29.6%
FCF margin – 51.1% 27.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 51.1% 27.3%
Return on equity – 50.2% –
Return on assets – 26.0% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 30.3% –
Asset turnover – 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.9x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSFLECOCMBT
Debt / assets 67.8% 43.8% 61.8%
Debt / equity 2.3x 0.8x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.1x 1.0x 4.8x
Debt / FCF – 2.0x 6.9x
Liabilities / assets 70.6% 46.8% 64.6%
Equity / assets 29.4% 53.2% 35.4%
Interest coverage – – 2.3x
Current ratio 0.4x 4.4x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.4x 3.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 2.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 4.76 1.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSFLECOCMBT
Dividend yield 6.6% 9.9% 4.6%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 6.6% 9.9% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSFLECOCMBT
Forward P/E 23.2xFY2026 5.5xFY2026 7.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.55FY2026 $17.61FY2026 $2.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +450.0%FY2026 +367.1%FY2026 +262.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +76.4% -49.7% -21.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $691.35MFY2026 $912.99MFY2026 $2.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.7%FY2026 +244.0%FY2026 +27.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.5% -35.5% +1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSFLECOCMBT
Held by institutions 43.5% 29.9% 20.1%
Institutions holding 223 116 169
Change in shares held, QoQ +15.8% +2.4% +8.7%
Institutions buying 133 75 78
Institutions selling 55 29 51
Buyers to sellers 2.42 2.59 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SFLECOCMBT
SFL 1.00 0.60 0.57
ECO 0.60 1.00 0.66
CMBT 0.57 0.66 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SFL, ECO and CMBT?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sfl (SFL) $1.69B, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) $3.03B, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) $4.17B.

Which stock is cheaper, SFL, ECO and CMBT?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sfl (SFL) 26.0x, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 7.5x, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 4.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) is cheapest (Sfl (SFL) 23.2x, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 5.5x, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 7.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +105.2%, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +84.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) has the highest net margin (Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 56.9%, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 29.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) returned the most: Sfl (SFL) +81.3%, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +198.0%, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +96.7%. Over five years, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) compounded fastest (Sfl (SFL) +9.7%/yr, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +11.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sfl (SFL) has been the steadiest (Sfl (SFL) 31.1%, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 45.9%, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 40.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SFL, ECO and CMBT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.