SCHL vs WLY vs NYT Stock Comparison

Scholastic, John Wiley & Sons and New York Times Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SCHL Scholastic Corp
$38.84 +15.7% 1M +34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$741.45M
P/E
13.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.57B
Div. yield
0.03%
Publishing Communication Services
3 wins
WLY John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
$50.58 +6.2% 1M +34.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.60B
P/E
13.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.67B
Div. yield
0.03%
Publishing Communication Services
3 wins
NYT New York Times Co
$69.18 +7.8% 1M +20.5% 1Y
Market cap
$11.27B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.98B
Div. yield
0.01%
Publishing Communication Services
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

New York Times leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (New York Times 6, Scholastic 3, John Wiley & Sons 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSCHLWLYNYTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $741.45M $2.60B $11.27B NYT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.1x 13.1x 28.7x SCHL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 29.2x 10.2x 25.5x WLY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% -0.3% +10.8% NYT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.6% 11.9% 13.2% NYT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.2% 13.7% — WLY
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 3.1x — SCHL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.03% 0.01% WLY
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +34.5% +34.1% +20.5% SCHL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.4%/yr -1.4%/yr +4.9%/yr NYT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.3% 37.0% 31.9% NYT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 74/100 79/100 NYT

Percentile Scorecard

SCHLWLYNYT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSCHLWLYNYT
Valuation 56 #24 of 53 73 #15 of 53 37 #34 of 53
Growth 33 #30 of 44 98 #2 of 44 95 #3 of 44
Profitability 51 #21 of 42 93 #4 of 42 98 #2 of 42
Financial Health 67 #21 of 61 57 #27 of 61 90 #7 of 61
Shareholder Returns 64 #10 of 26 48 #14 of 26 76 #7 of 26
Overall 54 74 79
  • SCHL ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • WLY ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • NYT ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSCHLWLYNYTSPY
1 month +15.7%+6.2%+7.8% +0.9%
3 months -5.3%-9.3%-11.0% +5.9%
6 months -3.5%+24.5%-12.5% +8.5%
Year to date +31.1%+65.1%-0.3% +13.3%
1 year +34.5%+34.1%+20.5% +12.4%
3 years +4.4%+68.1%+73.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +1.4%+18.9%+20.1% +23.5%
5 years +7.3%-6.6%+26.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +1.4%-1.4%+4.9% +11.0%
10 years +2.2%-0.1%+526.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year +0.2%0.0%+20.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSCHLWLYNYTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.3%37.0%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%35.3%38.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.310.130.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.980.920.64 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.7%-50.0%-50.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.0%-9.3%-19.4% -0.9%
52-week high $47.34$55.74$85.86 $779.14
52-week low $27.00$28.79$56.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSCHLWLYNYT
P/E now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 18.7x 13.0xmedian 18.7x 28.5xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.6x 1.5xmedian 0.6x 3.7xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 10.6x 9.9xmedian 10.6x 18.7xmedian 10.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -47.5xmedian 8.9x 10.7xmedian 8.9x 17.8xmedian 8.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.6x 3.2xmedian 1.6x 5.4xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.72median 0.49 0.16median 0.49 0.92median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSCHLWLYNYT
Revenue $1.57B $1.67B $2.98B
Gross profit $888.70M $1.24B $1.53B
Operating income $15.20M $248.83M $475.01M
Net income $56.60M $198.19M $392.83M
Free cash flow -$14.40M $239.89M $623.02M
R&D – – $274.41M
EPS (diluted) $2.99 $3.91 $2.41
Cash & equivalents $106.80M $106.43M $232.66M
Total debt $184.80M $1.29B –
Shares (diluted) 18.90M 50.75M 163.04M
Enterprise value $295.85M $2.25B $8.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSCHLWLYNYT
P/E 13.0x 13.0x 28.5x
P/FCF -47.5x 10.7x 17.8x
P/Operating cash flow 17.9x 8.8x 16.9x
P/S 0.4x 1.5x 3.7x
P/B 1.0x 3.2x 5.4x
P/Tangible book 1.2x -45.6x 6.1x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 9.9x 18.7x
EV/EBIT 50.1x 15.1x 22.0x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 2.3x 3.5x
EV/FCF -52.9x 15.6x 16.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.0x 12.9x 15.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.72 0.16 0.92

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSCHLWLYNYT
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% -0.3% 10.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.0% – 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.2% 0.3% 13.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.3% – 10.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.6% 11.4% 22.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -38.5% – 27.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 639.0% 103.7% 22.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -0.6% 76.1% 30.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 818.7% 116.6% 23.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 18.0% 79.4% 31.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -54.8% 40.7% 34.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.4% 0.6% 37.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -134.2% 62.8% 36.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.8% 6.0% 40.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSCHLWLYNYT
Gross margin 56.5% 74.6% 51.4%
EBITDA margin 6.2% 22.6% 18.8%
Operating margin 1.0% 14.9% 16.0%
Pretax margin 5.6% 11.1% 16.8%
Net margin 3.6% 11.9% 13.2%
FCF margin -0.9% 14.4% 20.9%
Operating cash flow margin 2.4% 17.4% 22.1%
Return on equity 8.0% 24.1% 19.4%
Return on assets 3.3% 6.9% 13.4%
Return on invested capital 1.2% 13.7% –
Return on capital employed 1.3% 11.4% 20.9%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.5x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 1.2% 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSCHLWLYNYT
Debt / assets 10.7% 41.2% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 3.1x –
Debt / FCF -12.8x 5.4x –
Liabilities / assets 61.9% 74.6% 31.4%
Equity / assets 38.1% 25.4% 68.6%
Interest coverage – 5.3x –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.6x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.5x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 2.21 2.12 10.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSCHLWLYNYT
Dividend yield 2.2% 2.8% 1.3%
Net buyback yield 38.8% 4.0% 1.6%
Shareholder yield 41.0% 6.8% 2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 32.9% 37.1% 32.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) -129.2% 30.7% 20.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) -15.8% -3.0% 33.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -11.7% -1.6% 26.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSCHLWLYNYT
Forward P/E 29.2xFY2026 10.2xFY2026 25.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.33FY2026 $4.95FY2026 $2.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -28.9%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +78.2% +4.4% +18.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.66BFY2026 $1.63BFY2026 $3.24BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.1%FY2026 -2.8%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.8% +13.6% +6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSCHLWLYNYT
Held by institutions 73.2% 99.1% 100.0%
Institutions holding 226 264 630
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.2% -0.6% +2.3%
Institutions buying 109 142 313
Institutions selling 89 77 223
Buyers to sellers 1.22 1.84 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SCHLWLYNYT
SCHL 1.00 0.25 0.05
WLY 0.25 1.00 0.20
NYT 0.05 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SCHL, WLY and NYT?

New York Times (NYT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Scholastic (SCHL) $741.45M, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) $2.60B, New York Times (NYT) $11.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, SCHL, WLY and NYT?

Scholastic (SCHL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Scholastic (SCHL) 13.1x, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 13.1x, New York Times (NYT) 28.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) is cheapest (Scholastic (SCHL) 29.2x, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 10.2x, New York Times (NYT) 25.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

New York Times (NYT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Scholastic (SCHL) -2.5%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) -0.3%, New York Times (NYT) +10.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

New York Times (NYT) has the highest net margin (Scholastic (SCHL) 3.6%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 11.9%, New York Times (NYT) 13.2%). On return on invested capital, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) leads (Scholastic (SCHL) 1.2%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 13.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Scholastic (SCHL) returned the most: Scholastic (SCHL) +34.5%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) +34.1%, New York Times (NYT) +20.5%. Over five years, New York Times (NYT) compounded fastest (Scholastic (SCHL) +1.4%/yr, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) -1.4%/yr, New York Times (NYT) +4.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

John Wiley & Sons (WLY) has the highest dividend yield: Scholastic (SCHL) 0.03%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 0.03%, New York Times (NYT) 0.01%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, New York Times (NYT) has been the steadiest (Scholastic (SCHL) 35.3%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 37.0%, New York Times (NYT) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SCHL, WLY and NYT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, New York Times (NYT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.