SBSW vs GWAV vs WPM Stock Comparison

Sibanye Stillwater, Greenwave Technology Solutions and Wheaton Precious Metals Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Ltd
$9.20 -12.6% 1M -17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.58B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Platinum and Palladium Basic Materials
1 win
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
$120.87 -16.9% 1M +23.0% 1Y
Market cap
$55.54B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
-$35.66M
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Wheaton Precious Metals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Wheaton Precious Metals 5, Greenwave Technology Solutions 2, Sibanye Stillwater 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSBSWGWAVWPMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.58B $2.00M $55.54B WPM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -0.1x 27.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.1x — 27.7x SBSW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +71.8% -6.5% GWAV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -27.7% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 18.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.1x 0.7x GWAV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.5% -73.7% +23.0% WPM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.7%/yr -90.6%/yr +23.9%/yr WPM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.3% 103.4% 50.7% WPM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 37/100 78/100 WPM

Percentile Scorecard

SBSWGWAVWPM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSBSWGWAVWPM
Valuation – 40 #98 of 162 75 #46 of 183
Growth – 65 #52 of 147 92 #10 of 113
Profitability – 31 #85 of 122 98 #4 of 131
Financial Health – 12 #146 of 166 76 #41 of 168
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 107 – 48 #40 of 76
Overall – 37 78
  • SBSW ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • GWAV ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • WPM ranked among 212 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSBSWGWAVWPMSPY
1 month -12.6%-13.3%-16.9% -1.0%
3 months +9.8%-12.9%+8.4% +2.9%
6 months -27.7%-35.3%-13.3% +6.4%
Year to date -35.4%-56.3%+2.9% +11.4%
1 year -17.5%-73.7%+23.0% +13.1%
3 years +77.9%-100.0%+176.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +21.2%-93.8%+40.4% +21.5%
5 years -36.4%-100.0%+192.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year -8.7%-90.6%+23.9% +10.9%
10 years -21.0%-100.0%+396.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year -2.3%-76.1%+17.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureSBSWGWAVWPMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.3%103.4%50.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.8%106.1%54.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.580.841.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.27-0.710.45 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.4%-100.0%-43.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.4%-73.7%-27.1% -2.5%
52-week high $21.12$8.70$165.72 $779.14
52-week low $8.00$2.29$94.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSBSWGWAVWPM
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.7x -0.1xmedian 12.7x 26.9xmedian 33.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x 0.0xmedian 3.1x -1,539xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 6.9x -2.5xmedian 6.9x 21.6xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.1x -0.6xmedian 15.1x 21.6xmedian 13.4x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.1x 0.1xmedian 2.1x 5.7xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.27 0.00median 0.27 0.46median 0.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSBSWGWAVWPM
Revenue – $60.56M -$35.66M
Gross profit – $19.15M $2.40B
Operating income – -$15.21M $2.28B
Net income – -$16.76M $2.05B
Free cash flow – -$3.45M $2.54B
EPS (diluted) – $-20.20 $4.48
Cash & equivalents – $654.99K $100.19M
Total debt $2.24B $33.77M $1.99B
Shares (diluted) 707.64M 829.63K 454.69M
Enterprise value $6.58B -$2.51M $50.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSBSWGWAVWPM
P/E – -0.1x 26.9x
P/FCF – -0.6x 21.6x
P/Operating cash flow – -0.9x 21.6x
P/S – 0.0x -1,539x
P/B – 0.1x 5.7x
P/Tangible book – 0.2x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA – -2.5x 21.6x
EV/EBIT – -0.8x 24.9x
EV/Revenue – 0.2x -1,592x
EV/FCF – -3.5x 22.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – -5.8x 22.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.00 0.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSBSWGWAVWPM
Revenue growth (1Y) – 71.8% -6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 23.9% -17.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 46.8% 114.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.4% 69.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 51.0% 149.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -3.4% 73.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – 48.8% 159.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 8.7% 49.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 69.1% 158.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -64.7% 58.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 65.6% 88.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% 56.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 79.3% 88.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.0% 56.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSBSWGWAVWPM
Gross margin – 31.6% –
EBITDA margin – -8.1% –
Operating margin – -25.1% –
Pretax margin – -27.7% –
Net margin – -27.7% –
FCF margin – -5.7% –
Operating cash flow margin – -3.5% -7,135%
Return on equity – -73.5% 21.5%
Return on assets – -31.4% 18.5%
Return on invested capital – – 18.7%
Return on capital employed – -64.6% 21.2%
Asset turnover – 1.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.1x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – -67.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSBSWGWAVWPM
Debt / assets – 20.6% 16.3%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.1x 0.7x
Debt / FCF – -3.1x 0.8x
Liabilities / assets – 59.8% 20.3%
Equity / assets – 40.2% 79.7%
Interest coverage – -10.0x 61.9x
Current ratio – 0.2x 0.5x
Quick ratio – 0.1x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – -14.24 14.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSBSWGWAVWPM
Dividend yield 8.7% – 0.6%
Net buyback yield – – 0.0%
Shareholder yield 8.7% – 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 23.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 19.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 11.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 7.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSBSWGWAVWPM
Forward P/E 4.1xFY2026 – 27.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.24FY2026 – $4.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +44.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -8.5% – +24.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.53BFY2026 – $3.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.4%FY2026 – +46.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.1% – +24.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSBSWGWAVWPM
Held by institutions 18.3% 1.8% 63.9%
Institutions holding 255 7 846
Change in shares held, QoQ -6.9% -52.2% +2.8%
Institutions buying 127 2 419
Institutions selling 89 1 266
Buyers to sellers 1.43 2.00 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SBSWGWAVWPM
SBSW 1.00 0.09 0.85
GWAV 0.09 1.00 0.03
WPM 0.85 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SBSW, GWAV and WPM?

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW) $6.58B, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) $2.00M, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) $55.54B.

Which company is growing faster?

Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) +71.8%, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) -6.5%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) returned the most: Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW) -17.5%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -73.7%, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) +23.0%. Over five years, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) compounded fastest (Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW) -8.7%/yr, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -90.6%/yr, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) +23.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW) 0.00%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) 0.00%, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 0.01%. Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW) and Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) has been the steadiest (Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW) 65.3%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) 103.4%, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 50.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SBSW, GWAV and WPM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.