SBET vs ZETA vs MCHX Stock Comparison

Sharplink, Zeta Global Holdings and Marchex Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SBET Sharplink, Inc.
$6.42 -32.4% 1M -47.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.31B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$50.20M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
1 win
MCHX Marchex Inc
$1.29 -5.1% 1M -24.6% 1Y
Market cap
$58.05M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$43.98M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Zeta Global Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Zeta Global Holdings 6, Sharplink 1, Marchex 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSBETZETAMCHXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.31B $7.61B $58.05M ZETA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.8x -3,509x -10.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 28.9x 32.2x ZETA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1,496.9% +35.9% -7.5% SBET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3,406.3% -0.1% -12.4% ZETA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.1% +47.8% -24.6% ZETA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -57.7%/yr +26.2%/yr -18.1%/yr ZETA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.5% 62.6% 50.2% MCHX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 29/100 61/100 41/100 ZETA

Percentile Scorecard

SBETZETAMCHX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSBETZETAMCHX
Valuation 4 #96 of 100 38 #62 of 100 42 #58 of 100
Growth 8 #91 of 99 99 #2 of 99 28 #72 of 99
Profitability 5 #91 of 96 51 #48 of 96 36 #62 of 96
Financial Health 100 #1 of 112 85 #18 of 112 78 #26 of 112
Shareholder Returns – 32 #46 of 67 23 #52 of 67
Overall 29 61 41
  • SBET ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • ZETA ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • MCHX ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSBETZETAMCHXSPY
1 month -32.4%-10.6%-5.1% -5.9%
3 months +2.1%+15.3%-28.7% -4.6%
6 months -13.8%+70.5%-19.4% +0.2%
Year to date -28.2%+44.8%-22.3% +7.5%
1 year -47.1%+47.8%-24.6% +8.2%
3 years -67.0%+262.5%-9.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year -30.9%+53.7%-3.4% +19.0%
5 years -98.6%+220.3%-63.1% +56.5%
5 years, per year -57.7%+26.2%-18.1% +9.4%
10 years -99.2%—-48.0% +251.5%
10 years, per year -38.0%—-6.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureSBETZETAMCHXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.5%62.6%50.2% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 78.5%60.2%52.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.122.130.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.600.76-0.49 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.5%-70.0%-65.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.1%-13.6%-32.1% -5.9%
52-week high $12.13$34.12$1.90 $779.14
52-week low $4.56$14.55$1.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSBETZETAMCHX
P/E now vs peer median -0.8xmedian 24.7x -3,333xmedian 24.7x -10.5xmedian 24.7x
P/S now vs peer median 27.7xmedian 2.8x 4.3xmedian 2.8x 1.2xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.5x 60.9xmedian 16.5x —median 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -42.6xmedian 15.3x 29.8xmedian 15.3x -67.6xmedian 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.7x 7.2xmedian 2.7x 1.8xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 -40.57median 0.77 -0.42median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSBETZETAMCHX
Revenue $50.20M $1.57B $43.98M
Gross profit – $934.32M $26.92M
Operating income -$1.71B $24.68M -$5.02M
Net income -$1.71B -$2.17M -$5.47M
Free cash flow -$32.71M $224.41M -$757.00K
R&D – $146.97M $8.97M
EPS (diluted) $-8.15 $-0.01 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $56.20M $309.95M $8.15M
Total debt – $197.48M –
Shares (diluted) 209.78M 256.58M 48.98M
Enterprise value $1.20B $6.31B $20.62M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSBETZETAMCHX
P/E -0.8x -3,333x -10.5x
P/FCF -42.6x 29.8x -67.6x
P/Operating cash flow -42.0x 27.7x -68.1x
P/S 27.7x 4.3x 1.2x
P/B 1.0x 7.2x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 26.5x 9.0x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – 60.9x –
EV/EBIT -0.8x 266.2x -8.6x
EV/Revenue 26.6x 4.2x 1.0x
EV/FCF -40.9x 29.3x -56.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -40.3x 27.3x -57.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -40.57 -0.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSBETZETAMCHX
Revenue growth (1Y) 1,497% 35.9% -7.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 33.7% -4.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 32.8% -12.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 30.9% -2.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,507% 192.5% -4.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 28.4% 25.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,510% 94.1% -17.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 78.9% 23.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -85.8% 95.0% -16.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 82.2% 24.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -730.6% 55.5% -33.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 42.4% 53.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -718.3% 64.2% 12.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 52.2% 56.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSBETZETAMCHX
Gross margin – 59.5% 61.2%
EBITDA margin – 6.9% –
Operating margin -3,402% 1.6% -11.4%
Pretax margin -3,400% -0.6% -11.8%
Net margin -3,406% -0.1% -12.4%
FCF margin -65.2% 14.3% -1.7%
Operating cash flow margin -66.1% 15.3% -1.7%
Return on equity -108.6% -0.2% -18.9%
Return on assets -108.2% -0.1% -14.4%
Return on invested capital – 0.5% –
Return on capital employed -108.5% 2.1% -16.5%
Asset turnover 0.0x 1.1x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x -111.1x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 6.2% 12.4% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSBETZETAMCHX
Debt / assets – 13.5% –
Debt / equity – 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.0x –
Debt / FCF – 0.9x –
Liabilities / assets 0.4% 36.9% 22.9%
Equity / assets 99.6% 63.1% 77.1%
Interest coverage – 16.1x –
Current ratio 10.5x 2.4x 2.3x
Quick ratio 10.3x 2.3x 2.2x
Cash ratio 10.2x 1.1x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 144.23 7.84 -7.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSBETZETAMCHX
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -199.1% 1.6% -0.1%
Shareholder yield -199.1% 1.6% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSBETZETAMCHX
Forward P/E – 28.9xFY2026 32.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-5.25FY2026 $1.02FY2026 $0.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +39.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +23.5% +300.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $45.31MFY2026 $1.93BFY2026 $57.01MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +61.2%FY2026 +48.2%FY2026 +25.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +56.5% +3.5% +29.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSBETZETAMCHX
Held by institutions 49.9% 82.6% 48.0%
Institutions holding 165 414 29
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.1% +3.9% +0.2%
Institutions buying 112 245 8
Institutions selling 30 117 9
Buyers to sellers 3.73 2.09 0.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SBETZETAMCHX
SBET 1.00 0.38 0.09
ZETA 0.38 1.00 0.06
MCHX 0.09 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SBET, ZETA and MCHX?

Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sharplink (SBET) $1.31B, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) $7.61B, Marchex (MCHX) $58.05M.

Which company is growing faster?

Sharplink (SBET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sharplink (SBET) +1,496.9%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +35.9%, Marchex (MCHX) -7.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) has the highest net margin (Sharplink (SBET) -3,406.3%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) -0.1%, Marchex (MCHX) -12.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) returned the most: Sharplink (SBET) -47.1%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +47.8%, Marchex (MCHX) -24.6%. Over five years, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) compounded fastest (Sharplink (SBET) -57.7%/yr, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) +26.2%/yr, Marchex (MCHX) -18.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Marchex (MCHX) has been the steadiest (Sharplink (SBET) 78.5%, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) 62.6%, Marchex (MCHX) 50.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SBET, ZETA and MCHX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zeta Global Holdings (ZETA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.