SAP vs ROP vs KHOBF Stock Comparison

Sap Se, Roper Technologies and Kheoba Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SAP Sap Se
$235.80 +11.9% 1M -13.4% 1Y
Market cap
$289.68B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.76B
Div. yield
1.25%
ERP Software Technology
5 wins
ROP Roper Technologies Inc
$434.48 +21.2% 1M -6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$42.97B
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.43B
Div. yield
0.84%
ERP Software Technology
2 wins
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sap Se leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sap Se 5, Roper Technologies 2, Kheoba 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSAPROPKHOBFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $289.68B $42.97B $20.23M SAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.8x 16.8x — ROP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.7x 18.9x — ROP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.5% +9.2% — SAP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 35.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.25% 0.84% — SAP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.4% -6.3% 0.0% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.8%/yr -2.2%/yr — SAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.3% 31.3% 0.0% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 44/100 — SAP

Percentile Scorecard

SAPROPKHOBF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSAPROPKHOBF
Valuation 52 #49 of 101 61 #40 of 101 –
Growth 68 #32 of 97 45 #54 of 97 –
Profitability 91 #9 of 94 44 #53 of 94 –
Financial Health 77 #26 of 108 47 #58 of 108 82 #20 of 108
Shareholder Returns 29 #46 of 64 24 #49 of 64 –
Overall 63 44 –
  • SAP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • ROP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSAPROPKHOBFSPY
1 month +11.9%+21.2%0.0% -0.2%
3 months +31.6%+11.1%0.0% +3.9%
6 months +35.9%+22.7%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date -2.9%-2.4%0.0% +12.9%
1 year -13.4%-6.3%0.0% +12.3%
3 years +79.5%-8.6%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +21.5%-3.0%— +23.3%
5 years +59.9%-10.7%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +9.8%-2.2%— +10.9%
10 years +169.0%+157.9%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.4%+9.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSAPROPKHOBFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.3%31.3%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.5%33.7%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.63-0.050.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.34-0.20— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.2%-46.9%-37.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.4%-6.3%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $272.16$463.73$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $146.09$315.53$2.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSAPROPKHOBF
P/E now vs peer median 28.8xmedian 28.3x 16.8xmedian 28.3x —median 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 2.8x 5.1xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 17.3x —median 17.3x —median 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 15.8x 13.2xmedian 15.8x —median 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 3.2x 2.2xmedian 3.2x 122.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.80median 0.85 -9.49median 0.85 —median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSAPROPKHOBF
Revenue $45.76B $8.43B –
Gross profit $33.40B $5.88B –
Operating income $22.06B $2.37B –
Net income $9.47B $2.59B –
Free cash flow $10.40B – –
R&D $8.26B – –
EPS (diluted) $8.11 $25.75 –
Cash & equivalents $10.62B $311.00M $318.16K
Total debt $9.68B – –
Shares (diluted) 1.18B 100.60M 8.09M
Enterprise value $217.66B $42.97B $19.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSAPROPKHOBF
P/E 28.8x 16.8x –
P/FCF 27.9x 13.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 25.2x 16.4x –
P/S 6.3x 5.1x –
P/B 5.5x 2.2x 122.0x
P/Tangible book 5.8x 4.4x 125.8x
EV/EBITDA 11.9x – –
EV/EBIT 12.7x – –
EV/Revenue 6.1x 5.1x –
EV/FCF 26.9x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 24.3x 16.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.80 -9.49 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSAPROPKHOBF
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.5% 9.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.7% 12.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.6% 10.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.1% 12.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 30.9% 8.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 52.1% 11.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 18.5% 65.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.4% -4.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 22.0% 77.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 16.0% -1.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 43.3% 3.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.0% 20.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 43.7% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSAPROPKHOBF
Gross margin 73.0% – –
EBITDA margin 51.5% – –
Operating margin 48.2% – –
Pretax margin 29.2% – –
Net margin 20.8% – –
FCF margin 22.7% – –
Operating cash flow margin 25.1% 31.1% –
Return on equity 18.5% – –
Return on assets 11.2% – –
Return on invested capital 35.6% – –
Return on capital employed 34.0% – –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 2.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSAPROPKHOBF
Debt / assets 11.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – –
Debt / FCF 0.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 39.1% 44.2% 49.8%
Equity / assets 60.9% 55.8% 50.2%
Interest coverage 8.3x – –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.4x 2.0x
Quick ratio 0.9x – 2.0x
Cash ratio 0.9x – 1.9x
Altman Z-score 7.48 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSAPROPKHOBF
Dividend yield 1.2% 0.8% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% – –
Shareholder yield 1.1% 0.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSAPROPKHOBF
Forward P/E 27.7xFY2026 18.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.52FY2026 $22.94FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +16.1%FY2026 +14.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +4.9% +12.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $42.86BFY2026 $8.28BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -2.4%FY2026 +4.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +14.3% +16.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSAPROPKHOBF
Held by institutions 7.2% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 820 1,075 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.0% +6.7% –
Institutions buying 459 415 –
Institutions selling 245 522 –
Buyers to sellers 1.87 0.80 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SAPROPKHOBF
SAP 1.00 0.47 –
ROP 0.47 1.00 –
KHOBF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SAP, ROP and KHOBF?

Sap Se (SAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sap Se (SAP) $289.68B, Roper Technologies (ROP) $42.97B, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, SAP, ROP and KHOBF?

Roper Technologies (ROP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sap Se (SAP) 28.8x, Roper Technologies (ROP) 16.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Roper Technologies (ROP) is cheapest (Sap Se (SAP) 27.7x, Roper Technologies (ROP) 18.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sap Se (SAP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sap Se (SAP) +13.5%, Roper Technologies (ROP) +9.2%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: Sap Se (SAP) -13.4%, Roper Technologies (ROP) -6.3%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%. Over five years, Sap Se (SAP) compounded fastest (Sap Se (SAP) +9.8%/yr, Roper Technologies (ROP) -2.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Sap Se (SAP) has the highest dividend yield: Sap Se (SAP) 1.25%, Roper Technologies (ROP) 0.84%. Kheoba (KHOBF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Sap Se (SAP) 39.3%, Roper Technologies (ROP) 31.3%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SAP, ROP and KHOBF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sap Se (SAP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.