SAN vs UBS vs MUFG Stock Comparison

Banco Santander, UBS Group AG and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SAN Banco Santander, S.A.
$11.69 -17.9% 1M +16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$175.11B
P/E
9.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$71.89B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
UBS UBS Group AG
$46.72 -3.9% 1M +19.5% 1Y
Market cap
$151.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 6, Banco Santander 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSANUBSMUFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $175.11B $151.72B $250.11B MUFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 9.3x — 16.6x SAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.7x 12.2x 12.6x SAN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% — -12.0% SAN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.2% — 47.7% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 3.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -5.9x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.2% +19.5% +42.3% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.3%/yr +20.8%/yr +31.3%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.8% 26.9% 26.3% MUFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 — 37/100 MUFG

Percentile Scorecard

SANUBSMUFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSANUBSMUFG
Valuation 23 #280 of 361 – 20 #289 of 361
Growth 39 #106 of 172 – 81 #33 of 172
Profitability 18 #122 of 149 – 61 #59 of 149
Financial Health 2 #155 of 158 25 #119 of 158 7 #147 of 158
Shareholder Returns 43 #194 of 338 11 #302 of 338 16 #283 of 338
Overall 25 – 37
  • SAN ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UBS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSANUBSMUFGSPY
1 month -17.9%-3.9%-8.1% +0.9%
3 months -12.5%-9.9%-2.2% +5.9%
6 months -2.4%+9.4%+23.1% +8.5%
Year to date -0.3%+0.9%+35.4% +13.3%
1 year +16.2%+19.5%+42.3% +12.4%
3 years +223.8%+100.0%+160.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +48.0%+26.0%+37.6% +23.5%
5 years +208.4%+157.4%+289.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +25.3%+20.8%+31.3% +11.0%
10 years +151.0%+225.3%+319.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.6%+12.5%+15.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSANUBSMUFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.8%26.9%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.1%28.1%26.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.691.270.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.470.731.61 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.0%-34.3%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.2%-16.2%-11.1% -0.9%
52-week high $15.03$55.73$24.14 $779.14
52-week low $10.01$36.41$14.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSANUBSMUFG
P/E now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x 16.2xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 3.4x —median 3.4x 8.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -9.4xmedian 5.1x —median 5.1x —median 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.9xmedian 10.8x —median 10.8x —median 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 1.8xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.39median 1.32 —median 1.32 0.27median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSANUBSMUFG
Revenue $71.89B – $31.62B
Gross profit -$3.71B – $29.85B
Operating income -$51.48B – $18.02B
Net income $20.00B – $13.97B
EPS (diluted) $1.26 – $1.32
Cash & equivalents – $215.72B –
Total debt $384.25B $29.83B $494.43B
Shares (diluted) 14.98B 3.29B 11.40B
Enterprise value -$510.29B -$778.40B -$91.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSANUBSMUFG
P/E 9.3x – 16.2x
P/FCF -4.9x – –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 2.4x – 8.1x
P/B 1.3x 1.8x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 1.8x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA -9.4x – –
EV/EBIT -9.0x – 5.5x
EV/Revenue 6.5x – 3.1x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.39 – 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSANUBSMUFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% – -12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.1% – -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 38.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -100.7% – 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.2% – 62.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 17.5% – 32.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -83.5% – 104.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.8% – 59.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSANUBSMUFG
Gross margin -5.2% – 94.4%
EBITDA margin -68.9% – –
Operating margin -71.6% – 57.0%
Pretax margin 31.9% – 59.6%
Net margin 26.2% – 47.7%
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity 27.7% – 11.7%
Return on assets 0.9% – 0.5%
Return on invested capital – – 3.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSANUBSMUFG
Debt / assets 16.1% 1.7% 4.7%
Debt / equity 2.9x 0.3x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -5.9x – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 94.4% 94.8% 96.0%
Equity / assets 5.6% 5.2% 4.0%
Interest coverage – – 0.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSANUBSMUFG
Dividend yield 2.4% 1.2% 1.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 2.4% 1.2% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSANUBSMUFG
Forward P/E 10.7xFY2026 12.2xFY2026 12.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.09FY2026 $3.82FY2026 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.8%FY2026 +38.9%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.9% +14.7% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.20BFY2026 $52.09BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.5%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.8% +12.6% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSANUBSMUFG
Held by institutions 3.4% – 3.0%
Institutions holding 660 – 574
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% – -0.1%
Institutions buying 403 – 324
Institutions selling 149 – 160
Buyers to sellers 2.70 – 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SANUBSMUFG
SAN 1.00 0.60 0.50
UBS 0.60 1.00 0.45
MUFG 0.50 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SAN, UBS and MUFG?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander (SAN) $175.11B, UBS Group AG (UBS) $151.72B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $250.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, SAN, UBS and MUFG?

Banco Santander (SAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Banco Santander (SAN) 9.3x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Banco Santander (SAN) is cheapest (Banco Santander (SAN) 10.7x, UBS Group AG (UBS) 12.2x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Banco Santander (SAN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Banco Santander (SAN) +9.5%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Banco Santander (SAN) 26.2%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Banco Santander (SAN) +16.2%, UBS Group AG (UBS) +19.5%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +42.3%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Banco Santander (SAN) +25.3%/yr, UBS Group AG (UBS) +20.8%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander (SAN) 34.8%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 26.9%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SAN, UBS and MUFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.