RXO vs GXO vs CHRW Stock Comparison

Rxo, GXO Logistics and C. H. Robinson Worldwide Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RXO RXO, Inc.
$27.66 +33.5% 1M +58.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.65B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.54B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
1 win
GXO GXO Logistics, Inc.
$49.91 +11.5% 1M -7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$5.79B
P/E
44.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.64B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

GXO Logistics leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (GXO Logistics 6, C. H. Robinson Worldwide 4, Rxo 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRXOGXOCHRWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.65B $5.79B $14.66B CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -52.8x 44.2x 21.9x CHRW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 212.8x 16.1x 20.8x GXO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% +7.6% +10.4% CHRW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.3% 1.0% — GXO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.2% 3.3% — GXO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 8.4x 3.1x — GXO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +58.9% -7.6% -1.5% RXO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -10.9%/yr +5.6%/yr CHRW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.8% 40.7% 48.4% GXO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 36/100 36/100 GXO

Percentile Scorecard

RXOGXOCHRW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRXOGXOCHRW
Valuation 15 #116 of 136 38 #85 of 136 27 #100 of 136
Growth 13 #105 of 121 75 #31 of 121 53 #58 of 121
Profitability 21 #89 of 112 29 #80 of 112 41 #66 of 112
Financial Health 43 #80 of 140 20 #112 of 140 22 #110 of 140
Shareholder Returns – 20 #64 of 80 35 #52 of 80
Overall 23 36 36
  • RXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRXOGXOCHRWSPY
1 month +33.5%+11.5%-14.9% +0.7%
3 months +34.5%-1.1%-13.3% +3.7%
6 months +38.5%-12.6%-29.9% +7.1%
Year to date +118.8%-5.2%-20.7% +12.8%
1 year +58.9%-7.6%-1.5% +11.9%
3 years +54.1%-1.1%+58.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +15.5%-0.4%+16.5% +22.8%
5 years —-43.8%+31.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-10.9%+5.6% +10.9%
10 years ——+88.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+6.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRXOGXOCHRWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.8%40.7%48.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.5%44.3%53.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.821.500.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.19-0.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.1%-69.6%-43.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.7%-23.9%-39.2% -1.2%
52-week high $29.32$65.59$209.42 $779.14
52-week low $10.48$44.15$127.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRXOGXOCHRW
P/E now vs peer median -53.3xmedian 16.5x 43.8xmedian 16.5x 22.6xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.9x 0.4xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 89.9xmedian 8.8x 10.2xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -62.5xmedian 11.9x 31.8xmedian 11.9x 26.2xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x 9.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 0.84 -3.62median 0.84 1.15median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRXOGXOCHRW
Revenue $6.54B $13.64B $18.22B
Gross profit $1.16B $2.08B –
Operating income -$52.00M $328.00M $884.59M
Net income -$88.00M $139.00M $668.81M
Free cash flow -$73.00M $180.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.51 $1.13 $5.58
Cash & equivalents $25.00M $769.00M $193.13M
Total debt $496.00M $3.20B –
Shares (diluted) 172.01M 115.72M 119.75M
Enterprise value $4.57B $3.03B $14.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRXOGXOCHRW
P/E -53.3x 43.8x 22.6x
P/FCF -62.5x 31.8x 26.2x
P/Operating cash flow -304.2x 11.3x 27.9x
P/S 0.7x 0.4x 0.8x
P/B 3.0x 1.9x 9.4x
P/Tangible book 4.2x 2.6x 9.4x
EV/EBITDA 89.9x 10.2x –
EV/EBIT -96.8x 24.9x –
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.6x 0.8x
EV/FCF -69.0x 45.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow -335.6x 16.0x 27.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 -3.62 1.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRXOGXOCHRW
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% 7.6% 10.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.1% 12.9% -0.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.7% 9.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 7.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.8% 52.6% 10.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -60.9% 4.6% 15.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -11.4% 107.5% 11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -253.0% -11.7% 19.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -9.2% 106.7% 12.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -210.5% -12.1% 19.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -140.5% 22.4% -39.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.1% 4.8% -28.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -305.6% 93.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.4% 20.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRXOGXOCHRW
Gross margin 17.7% 15.3% –
EBITDA margin 0.9% 5.9% –
Operating margin -0.8% 2.4% –
Pretax margin -1.6% 1.6% –
Net margin -1.3% 1.0% –
FCF margin -1.1% 1.3% –
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% 3.7% 2.9%
Return on equity -5.8% 4.5% –
Return on assets -2.5% 1.1% –
Return on invested capital -2.2% 3.3% –
Return on capital employed -2.3% 4.0% –
Asset turnover 1.9x 1.1x 3.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 3.7x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 0.3% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRXOGXOCHRW
Debt / assets 14.2% 25.9% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 8.4x 3.1x –
Debt / FCF -6.8x 17.8x –
Liabilities / assets 56.6% 75.6% 75.3%
Equity / assets 43.4% 24.4% 24.7%
Interest coverage – 2.5x –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.8x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score 3.15 1.56 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRXOGXOCHRW
Dividend yield – – 2.0%
Net buyback yield – 0.2% –
Shareholder yield – 0.2% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRXOGXOCHRW
Forward P/E 212.8xFY2026 16.1xFY2026 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.13FY2026 $3.10FY2026 $6.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +23.5%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +384.6% +9.0% +19.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.20BFY2026 $13.03BFY2026 $18.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.5%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.1% +17.6% +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRXOGXOCHRW
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 304 480 892
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.3% +5.8% -1.7%
Institutions buying 165 237 445
Institutions selling 83 153 319
Buyers to sellers 1.99 1.55 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RXOGXOCHRW
RXO 1.00 0.40 0.47
GXO 0.40 1.00 0.36
CHRW 0.47 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RXO, GXO and CHRW?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rxo (RXO) $4.65B, GXO Logistics (GXO) $5.79B, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, RXO, GXO and CHRW?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rxo (RXO) -52.8x, GXO Logistics (GXO) 44.2x, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, GXO Logistics (GXO) is cheapest (Rxo (RXO) 212.8x, GXO Logistics (GXO) 16.1x, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 20.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rxo (RXO) +10.1%, GXO Logistics (GXO) +7.6%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

GXO Logistics (GXO) has the highest net margin (Rxo (RXO) -1.3%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 1.0%). On return on invested capital, GXO Logistics (GXO) leads (Rxo (RXO) -2.2%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rxo (RXO) returned the most: Rxo (RXO) +58.9%, GXO Logistics (GXO) -7.6%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -1.5%. Over five years, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) compounded fastest (GXO Logistics (GXO) -10.9%/yr, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +5.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, GXO Logistics (GXO) has been the steadiest (Rxo (RXO) 75.8%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 40.7%, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 48.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RXO, GXO and CHRW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, GXO Logistics (GXO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.