RUN vs ZEO vs FGL Stock Comparison

Sunrun, Zeo Energy and Founder Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RUN Sunrun Inc.
$7.58 -9.2% 1M -61.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.75B
P/E
4.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.48B
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
7 wins
ZEO Zeo Energy Corp.
$0.27 -32.5% 1M -85.8% 1Y
Market cap
$9.41M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$71.82M
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
1 win
FGL Founder Group Ltd
$1.81 -59.1% 1M -94.5% 1Y
Market cap
$522.44K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Sunrun leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Sunrun 7, Zeo Energy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRUNZEOFGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.75B $9.41M $522.44K RUN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.4x -0.8x -0.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +63.2% +10.2% — RUN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.6% -15.4% — RUN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.5% -67.1% — RUN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 17.3x -0.4x — ZEO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -61.8% -85.8% -94.5% RUN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -31.9%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 82.1% 119.6% 515.9% RUN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 31/100 — RUN

Percentile Scorecard

RUNZEOFGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRUNZEOFGL
Valuation 75 #14 of 52 20 #42 of 52 73 #15 of 52
Growth 92 #4 of 37 8 #34 of 37 –
Profitability 31 #26 of 37 14 #32 of 37 –
Financial Health 5 #54 of 57 30 #40 of 57 29 #41 of 57
Shareholder Returns 15 #23 of 27 85 #5 of 27 –
Overall 44 31 –
  • RUN ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • ZEO ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • FGL ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRUNZEOFGLSPY
1 month -9.2%-32.5%-59.1% -1.0%
3 months -23.7%-50.0%+74.0% +2.9%
6 months -40.5%-70.7%-1.6% +6.4%
Year to date -58.8%-75.2%-88.8% +11.4%
1 year -61.8%-85.8%-94.5% +13.1%
3 years -21.6%-97.6%— +79.4%
3 years, per year -7.8%-71.2%— +21.5%
5 years -85.3%—— +67.7%
5 years, per year -31.9%—— +10.9%
10 years +20.9%—— +255.2%
10 years, per year +1.9%—— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureRUNZEOFGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 82.1%119.6%515.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 90.8%113.5%205.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.772.42-0.72 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.75-0.72-0.18 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.4%-98.2%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.6%-86.4%-96.5% -2.5%
52-week high $21.41$1.99$52.09 $779.14
52-week low $6.89$0.21$0.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRUNZEOFGL
P/E now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 25.6x -0.9xmedian 25.6x -0.3xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.8x 0.3xmedian 0.8x 0.0xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 12.7x -2.5xmedian 12.7x —median 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 22.4x -3.4xmedian 22.4x -0.1xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.3x 2.3xmedian 2.3x 0.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 0.57 0.02median 0.57 —median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRUNZEOFGL
Revenue $3.48B $71.82M –
Gross profit $1.23B $36.70M –
Operating income $92.29M -$11.92M –
Net income -$958.46M -$11.05M –
Free cash flow $287.45M -$6.29M –
R&D $38.46M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.47 $-0.31 –
Cash & equivalents – $2.50M $19.76M
Total debt $56.51B $17.94M $42.13M
Shares (diluted) 274.00M 35.84M 330.34K
Enterprise value $1.75B -$4.87M $522.44K

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRUNZEOFGL
P/E 4.5x -0.9x -0.3x
P/FCF 6.3x -3.4x -0.1x
P/Operating cash flow -9.1x -3.9x –
P/S 0.5x 0.3x 0.0x
P/B 0.4x 2.3x 0.1x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 2.3x 0.1x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x -2.5x –
EV/EBIT 177.2x -2.1x –
EV/Revenue 4.7x 0.3x –
EV/FCF 56.9x -4.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow -81.7x -4.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 0.02 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRUNZEOFGL
Revenue growth (1Y) 63.2% 10.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 192.3% 1.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 70.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 102.6% 41.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.5% -144.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 74.8% 44.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.5% -47.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 115.0% 29.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 54.4% -39.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 75.3% -497.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.2% -44.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 128.3% -257.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% -46.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRUNZEOFGL
Gross margin 35.3% 51.1% –
EBITDA margin 24.2% -14.0% –
Operating margin 2.7% -16.6% –
Pretax margin -26.4% -15.5% –
Net margin 11.6% -15.4% –
FCF margin 8.3% -8.8% –
Operating cash flow margin -5.8% -7.6% –
Return on equity -22.2% -96.1% –
Return on assets -4.2% -19.6% –
Return on invested capital 0.5% -67.1% –
Return on capital employed 0.4% -27.3% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 2.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRUNZEOFGL
Debt / assets 62.2% 11.0% 33.4%
Debt / equity 3.3x 0.7x 2.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 17.3x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 50.5x -1.0x –
Liabilities / assets 81.2% 83.4% 84.1%
Equity / assets 18.8% 16.6% 15.9%
Interest coverage – -60.1x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.6x 1.2x
Quick ratio – 1.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio – 0.2x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 0.04 -0.41 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRUNZEOFGL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.7% 4.9% –
Shareholder yield -0.7% 4.9% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRUNZEOFGL
Forward P/E 5.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.40FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -18.1%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -54.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.22BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +8.8%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -2.8% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRUNZEOFGL
Held by institutions 100.0% – –
Institutions holding 396 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.4% – –
Institutions buying 225 – –
Institutions selling 107 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.10 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RUNZEOFGL
RUN 1.00 0.21 -0.02
ZEO 0.21 1.00 -0.08
FGL -0.02 -0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RUN, ZEO and FGL?

Sunrun (RUN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sunrun (RUN) $1.75B, Zeo Energy (ZEO) $9.41M, Founder (FGL) $522.44K.

Which company is growing faster?

Sunrun (RUN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sunrun (RUN) +63.2%, Zeo Energy (ZEO) +10.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sunrun (RUN) has the highest net margin (Sunrun (RUN) 11.6%, Zeo Energy (ZEO) -15.4%). On return on invested capital, Sunrun (RUN) leads (Sunrun (RUN) 0.5%, Zeo Energy (ZEO) -67.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sunrun (RUN) returned the most: Sunrun (RUN) -61.8%, Zeo Energy (ZEO) -85.8%, Founder (FGL) -94.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sunrun (RUN) has been the steadiest (Sunrun (RUN) 82.1%, Zeo Energy (ZEO) 119.6%, Founder (FGL) 515.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RUN, ZEO and FGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sunrun (RUN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.