RTO vs FSV vs LGN Stock Comparison

Rentokil Initial, FirstService and Legence Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RTO Rentokil Initial Plc /Fi
$22.60 +9.4% 1M -22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$11.42B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.79%
Facility Services Industrials
3 wins
FSV FirstService Corp
$144.16 +12.1% 1M -12.4% 1Y
Market cap
$6.59B
P/E
56.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
1.02%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins
LGN Legence Corp.
$37.03 -29.5% 1M +2.5% 1Y
Market cap
$4.00B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.31B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

FirstService leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (FirstService 6, Rentokil Initial 3, Legence 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRTOFSVLGNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.42B $6.59B $4.00B RTO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 56.9x -42.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.8x 24.7x 26.8x RTO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +3.7% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 2.0% -2.0% FSV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.0% 2.1% FSV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.6x 4.7x FSV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.79% 1.02% — RTO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.9% -12.4% +2.5% LGN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.3%/yr -6.2%/yr — FSV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.8% 30.6% 73.2% FSV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 48/100 42/100 FSV

Percentile Scorecard

RTOFSVLGN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRTOFSVLGN
Valuation – 58 #21 of 49 37 #13 of 20
Growth – 56 #16 of 35 –
Profitability – 74 #9 of 32 50 #9 of 17
Financial Health – 40 #37 of 61 38 #14 of 22
Shareholder Returns 50 #11 of 21 10 #19 of 21 –
Overall – 48 42
  • RTO ranked among 64 companies in Business Services
  • FSV ranked among 64 companies in Business Services
  • LGN ranked among 22 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRTOFSVLGNSPY
1 month +9.4%+12.1%-29.5% -0.8%
3 months -21.2%+2.8%-45.2% +3.5%
6 months -32.5%-1.8%-54.5% +7.0%
Year to date -23.3%-7.3%-14.0% +12.2%
1 year -22.9%-12.4%+2.5% +13.0%
3 years -11.3%+5.2%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.9%+1.7%— +23.1%
5 years -45.1%-27.5%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -11.3%-6.2%— +11.0%
10 years +54.3%+240.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +4.4%+13.0%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRTOFSVLGNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.8%30.6%73.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.2%31.1%78.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.320.662.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.410.03 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.2%-44.0%-64.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.5%-12.7%-63.8% -1.8%
52-week high $34.52$165.10$102.27 $779.14
52-week low $19.75$125.66$33.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRTOFSVLGN
P/E now vs peer median —median 20.2x 56.9xmedian 20.2x -42.4xmedian 18.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.0x 1.2xmedian 1.0x 1.2xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.3x 14.8xmedian 12.3x 29.8xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 22.6x 12.3xmedian 22.6x —median 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.7x 7.0xmedian 1.7x 4.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.83 152.74median 1.83 —median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRTOFSVLGN
Revenue – $5.68B $3.31B
Gross profit – $1.88B $644.45M
Operating income – $339.62M $38.41M
Net income – $199.45M -$90.65M
Free cash flow – $536.84M –
EPS (diluted) – $2.52 $-0.87
Cash & equivalents $2.47B $160.76M $291.98M
Total debt -$7.31B $1.55B $4.30B
Shares (diluted) 507.00M 45.75M 76.03M
Enterprise value $4.93B $6.45B $3.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRTOFSVLGN
P/E – 56.9x -42.4x
P/FCF – 12.3x –
P/Operating cash flow – 15.8x –
P/S – 1.2x 1.2x
P/B – 7.0x 4.1x
P/Tangible book – 7.0x 21.6x
EV/EBITDA – 14.8x 29.8x
EV/EBIT – 23.5x 123.5x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 1.4x
EV/FCF – 14.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 19.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 152.74 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRTOFSVLGN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 3.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 9.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -0.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 8.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 4.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 6.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 12.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 0.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRTOFSVLGN
Gross margin – 33.1% 19.5%
EBITDA margin – 9.5% 4.8%
Operating margin – 6.0% 1.2%
Pretax margin – 4.8% -1.9%
Net margin – 2.0% -2.0%
FCF margin – 9.4% –
Operating cash flow margin – 7.4% –
Return on equity – 18.5% -10.5%
Return on assets – 4.5% -2.9%
Return on invested capital – 10.0% 2.1%
Return on capital employed – 9.8% 1.9%
Asset turnover – 1.3x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRTOFSVLGN
Debt / assets -13.4% 34.9% 27.7%
Debt / equity – 1.7x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.6x 4.7x
Debt / FCF – 2.9x –
Liabilities / assets – 78.9% 73.9%
Equity / assets – 21.1% 26.1%
Interest coverage – – 0.4x
Current ratio -683.2x 1.7x 1.3x
Quick ratio -411.8x 1.2x 1.3x
Cash ratio -411.8x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 1.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRTOFSVLGN
Dividend yield 2.8% 1.0% –
Net buyback yield – -9.2% –
Shareholder yield 2.8% -8.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRTOFSVLGN
Forward P/E 15.8xFY2026 24.7xFY2026 26.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.43FY2026 $5.84FY2026 $1.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.9%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +2.8% +8.9% +78.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.00BFY2026 $5.39BFY2026 $4.58BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.3%FY2026 -1.5%FY2026 +79.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.9% +19.9% +22.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRTOFSVLGN
Held by institutions 15.4% 69.9% 78.9%
Institutions holding 287 275 265
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.9% +7.2% +17.6%
Institutions buying 161 147 194
Institutions selling 90 101 58
Buyers to sellers 1.79 1.46 3.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RTOFSVLGN
RTO 1.00 0.26 -0.08
FSV 0.26 1.00 -0.08
LGN -0.08 -0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RTO, FSV and LGN?

Rentokil Initial (RTO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rentokil Initial (RTO) $11.42B, FirstService (FSV) $6.59B, Legence (LGN) $4.00B.

Which company is more profitable?

FirstService (FSV) has the highest net margin (FirstService (FSV) 2.0%, Legence (LGN) -2.0%). On return on invested capital, FirstService (FSV) leads (FirstService (FSV) 10.0%, Legence (LGN) 2.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Legence (LGN) returned the most: Rentokil Initial (RTO) -22.9%, FirstService (FSV) -12.4%, Legence (LGN) +2.5%. Over five years, FirstService (FSV) compounded fastest (Rentokil Initial (RTO) -11.3%/yr, FirstService (FSV) -6.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rentokil Initial (RTO) has the highest dividend yield: Rentokil Initial (RTO) 2.79%, FirstService (FSV) 1.02%. Legence (LGN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstService (FSV) has been the steadiest (Rentokil Initial (RTO) 34.8%, FirstService (FSV) 30.6%, Legence (LGN) 73.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RTO, FSV and LGN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, FirstService (FSV) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.