RTNTF vs LBSR vs AVPMF Stock Comparison

Rio Tinto, Liberty Star Uranium & Metals and Avrupa Minerals Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RTNTF Rio Tinto Ltd
$101.00 -11.9% 1M +18.8% 1Y
Market cap
$161.67B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Iron Ore Basic Materials
4 wins
AVPMF Avrupa Minerals Ltd.
$0.01 0.0% 1M -50.0% 1Y
Market cap
$646.75K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Iron Ore Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Rio Tinto leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Rio Tinto 4, Avrupa Minerals 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRTNTFLBSRAVPMFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $161.67B $1.78M $646.75K RTNTF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -1.6x -2.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.8% -77.8% -50.0% RTNTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.6%/yr -48.7%/yr -32.3%/yr RTNTF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.3% 225.9% 307.4% RTNTF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 8/100 33/100 AVPMF

Percentile Scorecard

RTNTFLBSRAVPMF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
Valuation – 1 #160 of 162 24 #124 of 162
Growth – 20 #118 of 147 25 #111 of 147
Profitability – – –
Financial Health 27 #121 of 165 4 #158 of 165 51 #81 of 165
Shareholder Returns – 8 #99 of 107 –
Overall – 8 33
  • RTNTF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LBSR ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • AVPMF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRTNTFLBSRAVPMFSPY
1 month -11.9%0.0%0.0% -0.8%
3 months -5.9%0.0%-50.0% +3.5%
6 months -20.2%0.0%-75.0% +7.0%
Year to date +2.1%-60.0%-75.0% +12.2%
1 year +18.8%-77.8%-50.0% +13.0%
3 years +38.0%-50.0%-50.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +11.3%-20.6%-20.6% +23.1%
5 years +44.3%-96.4%-85.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +7.6%-48.7%-32.3% +11.0%
10 years +159.9%-98.0%-97.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.0%-32.4%-32.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRTNTFLBSRAVPMFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.3%225.9%307.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.0%495.0%1,002.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.881.741.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.42-0.34-0.16 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.4%-98.8%-90.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.3%-75.0%-88.9% -1.8%
52-week high $133.44$0.08$0.09 $779.14
52-week low $81.39$0.01$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.8x -2.0xmedian 12.8x -2.9xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x —median 3.1x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.0x -6.1xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.2x -2.8xmedian 15.2x -2.2xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.1x -4.4xmedian 2.1x 0.6xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.29 -0.09median 0.29 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
Operating income – -$1.09M –
Net income – -$1.09M -$196.60K
Free cash flow – -$844.33K -$296.29K
R&D – $174.76K –
EPS (diluted) – $-0.01 –
Cash & equivalents $8.91B $42.27K $360.26K
Total debt $78.67B $1.98M –
Shares (diluted) 1.64B 111.24M –
Enterprise value $124.47B $958.94K -$29.06K

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
P/E – -2.0x -2.9x
P/FCF – -2.8x -2.2x
P/Operating cash flow – -2.8x -2.2x
P/S – – –
P/B 2.3x -4.4x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 2.5x -4.4x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA – -6.1x –
EV/EBIT – -2.5x –
EV/Revenue – – –
EV/FCF – -3.2x -1.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -3.2x -1.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.09 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
Revenue growth (1Y) – – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 4.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -18.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -1,123% -477.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -28.7% 8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – -711.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 22.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -19.5% -339.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -19.2% 10.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -19.5% -336.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -19.2% 10.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets – -1,789% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
Debt / assets 16.3% 486.9% –
Debt / equity 0.3x -0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.9x –
Debt / FCF – -0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 46.3% 691.1% 24.7%
Equity / assets 53.7% -591.1% 75.3%
Interest coverage – -1.4x –
Current ratio 1.4x 0.2x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.1x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.1x 1.7x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -41.2% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% -41.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRTNTFLBSRAVPMF
Forward P/E 12.2xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.30FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +24.1%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -3.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $66.01BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -4.1% – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RTNTFLBSRAVPMF
RTNTF 1.00 -0.01 0.01
LBSR -0.01 1.00 0.02
AVPMF 0.01 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RTNTF, LBSR and AVPMF?

Rio Tinto (RTNTF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rio Tinto (RTNTF) $161.67B, Liberty Star Uranium & Metals (LBSR) $1.78M, Avrupa Minerals (AVPMF) $646.75K.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rio Tinto (RTNTF) returned the most: Rio Tinto (RTNTF) +18.8%, Liberty Star Uranium & Metals (LBSR) -77.8%, Avrupa Minerals (AVPMF) -50.0%. Over five years, Rio Tinto (RTNTF) compounded fastest (Rio Tinto (RTNTF) +7.6%/yr, Liberty Star Uranium & Metals (LBSR) -48.7%/yr, Avrupa Minerals (AVPMF) -32.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rio Tinto (RTNTF) has been the steadiest (Rio Tinto (RTNTF) 45.3%, Liberty Star Uranium & Metals (LBSR) 225.9%, Avrupa Minerals (AVPMF) 307.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RTNTF, LBSR and AVPMF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rio Tinto (RTNTF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.