RSKIA vs SNTL vs BCO Stock Comparison

George Risk Industries, Sentinel Holdings and Brinks Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SNTL Sentinel Holdings Ltd.
$1.35 -22.0% 1M -76.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.08M
P/E
0.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.58M
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
4 wins
BCO Brinks Co
$107.18 +0.3% 1M -7.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.42B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.48B
Div. yield
0.96%
Security Services Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

George Risk Industries leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (George Risk Industries 5, Sentinel Holdings 4, Brinks 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRSKIASNTLBCOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $102.61M $13.08M $4.42B BCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.5x 0.9x 24.5x SNTL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 13.4x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.9% +250.7% +8.1% SNTL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 37.9% 311.9% 3.3% SNTL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x 3.3x SNTL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.96% — 0.96% RSKIA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.5% -76.3% -7.4% RSKIA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.6%/yr -7.6%/yr +9.4%/yr RSKIA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.4% 136.7% 34.2% RSKIA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 87/100 42/100 52/100 RSKIA

Percentile Scorecard

RSKIASNTLBCO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRSKIASNTLBCO
Valuation 78 #26 of 112 54 #52 of 112 63 #42 of 112
Growth 87 #13 of 96 97 #4 of 96 63 #36 of 96
Profitability 86 #14 of 91 46 #50 of 91 67 #31 of 91
Financial Health 99 #2 of 125 10 #113 of 125 24 #95 of 125
Shareholder Returns 85 #11 of 67 2 #66 of 67 41 #40 of 67
Overall 87 42 52
  • RSKIA ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SNTL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BCO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRSKIASNTLBCOSPY
1 month -6.3%-22.0%+0.3% -0.2%
3 months +10.5%-64.5%-9.3% +3.9%
6 months +13.5%-75.5%-1.4% +8.2%
Year to date +21.7%-78.1%-8.2% +12.9%
1 year +23.5%-76.3%-7.4% +12.3%
3 years +78.6%-77.5%+63.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +21.4%-39.2%+17.7% +23.3%
5 years +57.8%-32.5%+56.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +9.6%-7.6%+9.4% +10.9%
10 years +182.1%+1,025.0%+163.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.9%+27.4%+10.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRSKIASNTLBCOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.4%136.7%34.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.7%166.0%33.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.02-0.600.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.92-0.56-0.22 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-80.5%-33.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-78.7%-20.9% -1.2%
52-week high $22.75$6.35$135.58 $779.14
52-week low $16.30$1.27$92.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRSKIASNTLBCO
P/E now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 21.2x 0.9xmedian 21.2x 24.5xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 0.9x 2.9xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 11.9x -3.2xmedian 11.9x 8.2xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 13.7x 6.0xmedian 13.7x 11.2xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.4x -3.6xmedian 2.4x 10.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.60median 1.00 0.01median 1.00 1.08median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRSKIASNTLBCO
Revenue $25.81M $4.58M $5.48B
Gross profit $12.15M $340.92K $1.45B
Operating income $7.06M -$4.61M $576.00M
Net income $9.79M -$881.22K $191.00M
Free cash flow $4.22M $2.17M $393.60M
EPS (diluted) $1.99 $1.47 $4.36
Cash & equivalents $6.84M $146.09K $1.66B
Total debt – $3.26M $4.59B
Shares (diluted) 4.91M 9.69M 41.50M
Enterprise value -$85.67M $11.74M -$1.72B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTLBCO
P/E 10.5x 0.9x 24.5x
P/FCF 24.3x 6.0x 11.2x
P/Operating cash flow 22.9x 5.6x 7.9x
P/S 4.0x 2.9x 0.8x
P/B 1.6x -3.6x 10.0x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -2.9x 49.7x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x -3.2x 8.2x
EV/EBIT 7.4x -2.9x 12.8x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 2.9x 1.3x
EV/FCF 12.4x 6.2x 18.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x 5.8x 13.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.60 0.01 1.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTLBCO
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.9% 250.7% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.8% -19.0% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.6% 156.9% 13.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.2% -38.0% 9.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.6% 43.4% 22.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% 2.3% 14.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.1% 90.2% 9.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 17.2% 22.2% 15.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 19.2% 322.4% 13.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 104.3% 22.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.8% 328.9% -1.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.7% 245.0% 1.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% 312.6% 13.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.3% 237.5% 3.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTLBCO
Gross margin 47.1% 7.4% 26.4%
EBITDA margin 29.0% -91.9% 16.3%
Operating margin 27.4% -100.8% 10.5%
Pretax margin 50.9% -18.1% 5.9%
Net margin 37.9% 311.9% 3.3%
FCF margin 16.4% 47.4% 7.2%
Operating cash flow margin 17.3% 50.6% 10.2%
Return on equity 15.2% – 45.7%
Return on assets 13.4% -40.8% 2.6%
Return on invested capital – – 6.9%
Return on capital employed 10.4% – 11.0%
Asset turnover 0.4x 2.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x -2.6x 2.9x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTLBCO
Debt / assets – 27.8% 62.6%
Debt / equity – -0.2x 10.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x 3.3x
Debt / FCF – 0.3x 11.7x
Liabilities / assets 11.9% 279.9% 94.0%
Equity / assets 88.1% -179.9% 6.0%
Interest coverage – -9.2x 2.3x
Current ratio 14.6x 0.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 11.2x 0.2x 1.2x
Cash ratio 10.3x 0.0x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 10.02 -24.05 1.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTLBCO
Dividend yield 6.0% – 1.0%
Net buyback yield – -15.6% 2.5%
Shareholder yield 6.0% -15.6% 3.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 22.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 10.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -0.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRSKIASNTLBCO
Forward P/E – – 13.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $8.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -0.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +24.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $5.22BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – -0.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +4.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRSKIASNTLBCO
Held by institutions – – 100.0%
Institutions holding – – 359
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +12.1%
Institutions buying – – 182
Institutions selling – – 122
Buyers to sellers – – 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RSKIASNTLBCO
RSKIA 1.00 -0.11 0.07
SNTL -0.11 1.00 -0.07
BCO 0.07 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RSKIA, SNTL and BCO?

Brinks (BCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) $102.61M, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) $13.08M, Brinks (BCO) $4.42B.

Which stock is cheaper, RSKIA, SNTL and BCO?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 10.5x, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 0.9x, Brinks (BCO) 24.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +13.9%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) +250.7%, Brinks (BCO) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) has the highest net margin (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 37.9%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 311.9%, Brinks (BCO) 3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year George Risk Industries (RSKIA) returned the most: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +23.5%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -76.3%, Brinks (BCO) -7.4%. Over five years, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) compounded fastest (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +9.6%/yr, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -7.6%/yr, Brinks (BCO) +9.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has the highest dividend yield: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 5.96%, Brinks (BCO) 0.96%. Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has been the steadiest (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 25.4%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 136.7%, Brinks (BCO) 34.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RSKIA, SNTL and BCO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.