RSKIA vs SNT Stock Comparison

George Risk Industries and Senstar Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

George Risk Industries leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (George Risk Industries 8). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRSKIASNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $102.61M $35.81M RSKIA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.5x 72.8x RSKIA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.9% -3.2% RSKIA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 37.9% 1.3% RSKIA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.5% -69.0% RSKIA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.7%/yr -17.3%/yr RSKIA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.5% 59.0% RSKIA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 87/100 50/100 RSKIA

Percentile Scorecard

RSKIASNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRSKIASNT
Valuation 78 #26 of 112 73 #31 of 112
Growth 87 #13 of 96 3 #93 of 96
Profitability 86 #14 of 91 36 #59 of 91
Financial Health 99 #2 of 125 89 #15 of 125
Shareholder Returns 86 #10 of 67 –
Overall 87 50
  • RSKIA ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRSKIASNTSPY
1 month -6.2%-5.6% -0.8%
3 months +10.6%-14.1% +3.5%
6 months +13.6%-47.2% +7.0%
Year to date +21.7%-68.5% +12.2%
1 year +23.5%-69.0% +13.0%
3 years +78.7%+33.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +21.4%+10.1% +23.1%
5 years +59.1%-61.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +9.7%-17.3% +11.0%
10 years +190.1%-65.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.2%-10.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRSKIASNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.5%59.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.0%60.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.020.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.92-1.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-74.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-69.0% -1.8%
52-week high $22.75$4.91 $779.14
52-week low $16.30$1.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRSKIASNT
P/E now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 21.9x 72.1xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 0.9x 1.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 12.2x —median 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.3x 0.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.60median 1.02 —median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRSKIASNT
Revenue $25.81M $36.80M
Gross profit $12.15M $23.34M
Operating income $7.06M $729.00K
Net income $9.79M $378.00K
Free cash flow $4.22M –
R&D – $3.98M
EPS (diluted) $1.99 $0.02
Cash & equivalents $6.84M $7.88M
Total debt – $1.14M
Shares (diluted) 4.91M 23.46M
Enterprise value -$85.67M -$26.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRSKIASNT
P/E 10.5x 72.1x
P/FCF 24.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 22.9x –
P/S 4.0x 1.0x
P/B 1.6x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x –
EV/EBIT 7.4x 38.2x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 0.8x
EV/FCF 12.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.60 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRSKIASNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.9% -3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.6% -7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.6% -86.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 19.1% -92.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 17.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 19.2% -90.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRSKIASNT
Gross margin 47.1% 63.4%
EBITDA margin 29.0% –
Operating margin 27.4% 2.0%
Pretax margin 50.9% 2.4%
Net margin 37.9% 1.3%
FCF margin 16.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 17.3% –
Return on equity 15.2% 0.9%
Return on assets 13.4% 0.7%
Return on invested capital – 0.7%
Return on capital employed 10.4% 1.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRSKIASNT
Debt / assets – 0.8%
Debt / equity – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 11.9% 20.6%
Equity / assets 88.1% 79.4%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 14.6x 3.6x
Quick ratio 11.2x 2.2x
Cash ratio 10.3x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 10.02 3.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRSKIASNT
Dividend yield 6.0% –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 6.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRSKIASNT

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RSKIASNT
RSKIA 1.00 0.04
SNT 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RSKIA and SNT?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) is the largest by market capitalisation: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) $102.61M, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $35.81M.

Which stock is cheaper, RSKIA and SNT?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 10.5x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 72.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +13.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has the highest net margin (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 37.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year George Risk Industries (RSKIA) returned the most: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +23.5%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -69.0%. Over five years, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) compounded fastest (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +9.7%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -17.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has been the steadiest (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 25.5%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do RSKIA and SNT move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.04, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, RSKIA and SNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.