ROP vs BRSL vs KHOBF Stock Comparison

Roper Technologies, Brightstar Lottery and Kheoba Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ROP Roper Technologies Inc
$441.65 +23.2% 1M -7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$43.63B
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.43B
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
4 wins
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Roper Technologies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Roper Technologies 4, Brightstar Lottery 2, Kheoba 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionROPBRSLKHOBFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $43.63B $1.87B $20.23M ROP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.8x 7.5x — BRSL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.3x 17.0x — BRSL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.2% +0.7% — ROP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 10.0% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.8% -42.7% 0.0% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.7%/yr -20.4%/yr — ROP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.3% 32.7% 0.0% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 41/100 — ROP

Percentile Scorecard

ROPBRSLKHOBF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisROPBRSLKHOBF
Valuation 61 #40 of 102 60 #41 of 102 –
Growth 45 #54 of 98 24 #75 of 98 –
Profitability 45 #53 of 95 60 #39 of 95 –
Financial Health 48 #57 of 109 29 #78 of 109 82 #20 of 109
Shareholder Returns 24 #49 of 64 35 #42 of 64 –
Overall 45 41 –
  • ROP ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • BRSL ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • KHOBF ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodROPBRSLKHOBFSPY
1 month +23.2%-4.4%0.0% -0.8%
3 months +17.8%-9.2%0.0% +3.5%
6 months +25.3%-26.0%0.0% +7.0%
Year to date -0.8%-38.6%0.0% +12.2%
1 year -7.8%-42.7%0.0% +13.0%
3 years -7.1%-64.7%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -2.4%-29.4%— +23.1%
5 years -8.2%-68.1%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.7%-20.4%— +11.0%
10 years +160.2%-66.5%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.0%-10.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureROPBRSLKHOBFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.3%32.7%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.7%34.3%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.040.840.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.25-1.31— 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.9%-72.7%-37.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.8%-44.1%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $463.73$17.00$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $315.53$9.22$2.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleROPBRSLKHOBF
P/E now vs peer median 17.1xmedian 28.8x 7.6xmedian 28.8x —median 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 2.8x 0.7xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.7x 3.5xmedian 17.7x —median 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 15.8x -1.2xmedian 15.8x —median 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.2x 0.9xmedian 3.2x 122.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -9.65median 0.85 -0.81median 0.85 —median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsROPBRSLKHOBF
Revenue $8.43B $2.47B –
Gross profit $5.88B $1.32B –
Operating income $2.37B $1.07B –
Net income $2.59B $366.00M –
Free cash flow – -$1.47B –
R&D – $52.00M –
EPS (diluted) $25.75 $1.26 –
Cash & equivalents $311.00M $558.00M $318.16K
Total debt – $19.09B –
Shares (diluted) 100.60M 197.00M 8.09M
Enterprise value $43.63B -$2.98B $19.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricROPBRSLKHOBF
P/E 17.1x 7.6x –
P/FCF 13.2x -1.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 16.7x -1.0x –
P/S 5.2x 0.7x –
P/B 2.3x 0.9x 122.0x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 0.9x 125.8x
EV/EBITDA – 3.5x –
EV/EBIT – 5.2x –
EV/Revenue 5.2x 2.3x –
EV/FCF – -3.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 16.7x -3.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -9.65 -0.81 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricROPBRSLKHOBF
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.2% 0.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.1% 9.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.4% -4.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 151.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.9% 88.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.8% -2.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 65.0% 8.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -4.0% -4.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 77.8% 33.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -1.8% -9.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.8% -265.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.8% -60.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -207.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -58.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricROPBRSLKHOBF
Gross margin – 53.5% –
EBITDA margin – 65.3% –
Operating margin – 43.2% –
Pretax margin – 24.4% –
Net margin – 10.0% –
FCF margin – -59.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 31.1% -74.7% –
Return on equity – 17.7% –
Return on assets – 4.2% –
Return on invested capital – 14.1% –
Return on capital employed – 14.2% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x -5.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricROPBRSLKHOBF
Debt / assets – 54.2% –
Debt / equity – 2.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.4x –
Debt / FCF – -3.0x –
Liabilities / assets 44.2% 74.9% 49.8%
Equity / assets 55.8% 25.1% 50.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.4x 1.1x 2.0x
Quick ratio – 0.5x 2.0x
Cash ratio – 0.5x 1.9x
Altman Z-score – 0.86 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricROPBRSLKHOBF
Dividend yield 0.8% 9.6% –
Net buyback yield – -17.7% –
Shareholder yield 0.8% -8.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusROPBRSLKHOBF
Forward P/E 19.3xFY2026 17.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $22.94FY2026 $0.56FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +14.7%FY2026 -38.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.3% +28.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.28BFY2026 $2.56BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +4.8%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +16.4% -2.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersROPBRSLKHOBF
Held by institutions 100.0% 44.1% –
Institutions holding 1,075 200 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.7% +3.8% –
Institutions buying 415 97 –
Institutions selling 522 58 –
Buyers to sellers 0.80 1.67 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ROPBRSLKHOBF
ROP 1.00 0.29 –
BRSL 0.29 1.00 –
KHOBF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ROP, BRSL and KHOBF?

Roper Technologies (ROP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Roper Technologies (ROP) $43.63B, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) $1.87B, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, ROP, BRSL and KHOBF?

Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Roper Technologies (ROP) 16.8x, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 7.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is cheapest (Roper Technologies (ROP) 19.3x, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 17.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Roper Technologies (ROP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Roper Technologies (ROP) +9.2%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) +0.7%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: Roper Technologies (ROP) -7.8%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -42.7%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%. Over five years, Roper Technologies (ROP) compounded fastest (Roper Technologies (ROP) -1.7%/yr, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -20.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Roper Technologies (ROP) 31.3%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 32.7%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ROP, BRSL and KHOBF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Roper Technologies (ROP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.