RNGE vs SNT vs ARL Stock Comparison

Range Impact, Senstar Technologies and American Realty Investors Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RNGE Range Impact, Inc.
$0.50 -33.3% 1M +194.1% 1Y
Market cap
$57.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins
SNT Senstar Technologies Corp
$1.56 -3.1% 1M -67.9% 1Y
Market cap
$36.40M
P/E
74.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.80M
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

American Realty Investors leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (American Realty Investors 4, Senstar Technologies 3, Range Impact 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRNGESNTARLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $57.71M $36.40M $270.39M ARL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 74.0x 32.4x ARL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -3.2% +6.8% ARL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.3% 16.4% ARL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.7% -0.9% SNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 28.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +194.1% -67.9% +2.8% RNGE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.8%/yr -16.9%/yr +7.2%/yr RNGE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 131.4% 59.0% 60.3% SNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 50/100 46/100 SNT

Percentile Scorecard

RNGESNTARL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRNGESNTARL
Valuation – 72 #32 of 112 40 #24 of 39
Growth – 3 #93 of 96 52 #16 of 32
Profitability – 36 #59 of 91 39 #18 of 29
Financial Health – 89 #15 of 125 54 #18 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – 50 46
  • RNGE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ARL ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRNGESNTARLSPY
1 month -33.3%-3.1%+2.1% -0.2%
3 months -39.8%-10.9%+11.3% +3.9%
6 months +163.2%-44.5%+15.3% +8.2%
Year to date +233.3%-67.7%+3.9% +12.9%
1 year +194.1%-67.9%+2.8% +12.3%
3 years +212.5%+36.8%+38.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +46.2%+11.0%+11.6% +23.3%
5 years +117.4%-60.3%+41.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +16.8%-16.9%+7.2% +10.9%
10 years -65.5%-65.2%+147.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year -10.1%-10.0%+9.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRNGESNTARLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 131.4%59.0%60.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 154.2%60.6%53.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.250.890.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.48-1.150.05 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.0%-74.7%-66.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.9%-68.2%-28.8% -1.2%
52-week high $0.96$4.91$23.44 $779.14
52-week low $0.13$1.34$13.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRNGESNTARL
P/E now vs peer median —median 7.9x 74.0xmedian 21.2x 32.3xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.7x 1.0xmedian 0.9x 5.3xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.2x —median 11.9x 86.1xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 6.2x —median 13.7x -7.8xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median —median 0.6x 0.9xmedian 2.4x 0.3xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 —median 1.00 -0.45median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRNGESNTARL
Revenue – $36.80M $51.05M
Gross profit – $23.34M –
Operating income – $729.00K -$9.34M
Net income – $378.00K $8.12M
Free cash flow – – -$34.41M
R&D – $3.98M –
EPS (diluted) – $0.02 $0.52
Cash & equivalents – $7.88M $10.85M
Total debt – $1.14M $218.03M
Shares (diluted) 115.42M 23.46M 16.15M
Enterprise value $57.71M -$26.32M -$74.06M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRNGESNTARL
P/E – 74.0x 32.3x
P/FCF – – -7.8x
P/Operating cash flow – – 82.9x
P/S – 1.0x 5.3x
P/B – 0.9x 0.3x
P/Tangible book – 0.9x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA – – 86.1x
EV/EBIT – 39.5x -43.2x
EV/Revenue – 0.8x 7.9x
EV/FCF – – -11.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 124.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRNGESNTARL
Revenue growth (1Y) – -3.2% 6.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -7.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -86.3% -64.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -2.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – -92.6% 168.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -71.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – -90.5% 170.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -71.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 125.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 27.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 68.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 17.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRNGESNTARL
Gross margin – 63.4% –
EBITDA margin – – 9.2%
Operating margin – 2.0% -18.3%
Pretax margin – 2.4% -8.7%
Net margin – 1.3% 16.4%
FCF margin – – -67.4%
Operating cash flow margin – – 6.4%
Return on equity – 0.9% 1.2%
Return on assets – 0.7% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 0.7% -0.9%
Return on capital employed – 1.6% –
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRNGESNTARL
Debt / assets – 0.8% 20.0%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 28.6x
Debt / FCF – – -6.3x
Liabilities / assets – 20.6% 25.4%
Equity / assets – 79.4% 74.6%
Interest coverage – – -1.0x
Current ratio – 3.6x –
Quick ratio – 2.2x –
Cash ratio – 1.0x –
Altman Z-score – 3.12 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRNGESNTARL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRNGESNTARL

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRNGESNTARL
Held by institutions – – 3.4%
Institutions holding – – 42
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +15.7%
Institutions buying – – 18
Institutions selling – – 12
Buyers to sellers – – 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RNGESNTARL
RNGE 1.00 -0.02 0.09
SNT -0.02 1.00 0.03
ARL 0.09 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RNGE, SNT and ARL?

American Realty Investors (ARL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Range Impact (RNGE) $57.71M, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $36.40M, American Realty Investors (ARL) $270.39M.

Which stock is cheaper, RNGE, SNT and ARL?

American Realty Investors (ARL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 74.0x, American Realty Investors (ARL) 32.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

American Realty Investors (ARL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%, American Realty Investors (ARL) +6.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

American Realty Investors (ARL) has the highest net margin (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%, American Realty Investors (ARL) 16.4%). On return on invested capital, Senstar Technologies (SNT) leads (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%, American Realty Investors (ARL) -0.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Range Impact (RNGE) returned the most: Range Impact (RNGE) +194.1%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -67.9%, American Realty Investors (ARL) +2.8%. Over five years, Range Impact (RNGE) compounded fastest (Range Impact (RNGE) +16.8%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -16.9%/yr, American Realty Investors (ARL) +7.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Senstar Technologies (SNT) has been the steadiest (Range Impact (RNGE) 131.4%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%, American Realty Investors (ARL) 60.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RNGE, SNT and ARL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, American Realty Investors (ARL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.