RNGE vs OPEN vs OZ Stock Comparison

Range Impact, Opendoor Technologies and Belpointe PREP Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RNGE Range Impact, Inc.
$0.50 -33.3% 1M +194.1% 1Y
Market cap
$57.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins
OZ Belpointe PREP, LLC
$35.58 -19.7% 1M -44.0% 1Y
Market cap
$135.40M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Range Impact leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Range Impact 2, Opendoor Technologies 1, Belpointe PREP 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRNGEOPENOZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $57.71M $1.85B $135.40M OPEN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -1.2x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -37.2% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -46.7% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -20.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +194.1% -75.8% -44.0% RNGE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.8%/yr -39.6%/yr -18.7%/yr RNGE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 131.4% 79.4% 32.6% OZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 12/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

RNGEOPENOZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRNGEOPENOZ
Valuation – 0 #39 of 39 –
Growth – 19 #27 of 33 –
Profitability – 17 #25 of 30 –
Financial Health – 22 #30 of 38 –
Shareholder Returns – 0 #14 of 14 –
Overall – 12 –
  • RNGE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OPEN ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OZ ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRNGEOPENOZSPY
1 month -33.3%-24.9%-19.7% -0.8%
3 months -39.8%-49.9%-21.2% +3.5%
6 months +163.2%-64.2%-28.9% +7.0%
Year to date +233.3%-66.9%-45.3% +12.2%
1 year +194.1%-75.8%-44.0% +13.0%
3 years +212.5%-7.2%-48.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +46.2%-2.5%-19.8% +23.1%
5 years +117.4%-91.9%-64.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.8%-39.6%-18.7% +11.0%
10 years -65.5%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year -10.1%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRNGEOPENOZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 131.4%79.4%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 154.2%81.0%38.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.253.020.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.48-0.95-1.35 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.0%-97.9%-65.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.9%-79.4%-47.7% -1.8%
52-week high $0.96$9.37$67.99 $779.14
52-week low $0.13$1.93$35.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRNGEOPENOZ
P/E now vs peer median —median 7.8x -1.2xmedian 7.8x —median 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.9x 0.6xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.2x -6.1xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 6.4x -3.9xmedian 6.4x —median 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median —median 0.6x 2.0xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.33 -0.13median 0.33 —median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRNGEOPENOZ
Revenue – $3.25B –
Gross profit – $281.00M –
Operating income – -$521.00M –
Net income – -$1.52B –
Free cash flow – -$474.00M –
R&D – $88.00M –
EPS (diluted) – $-1.57 –
Cash & equivalents – $896.00M –
Total debt – $1.96B –
Shares (diluted) 115.42M 965.78M 3.90M
Enterprise value $57.71M -$1.97B $135.40M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRNGEOPENOZ
P/E – -1.2x –
P/FCF – -3.9x –
P/Operating cash flow – -4.1x –
P/S – 0.6x –
P/B – 2.0x –
P/Tangible book – 2.0x –
EV/EBITDA – -6.1x –
EV/EBIT – -5.6x –
EV/Revenue – 0.9x –
EV/FCF – -6.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow – -6.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.13 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRNGEOPENOZ
Revenue growth (1Y) – -37.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -34.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -32.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 115.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -126.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -398.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -2.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -276.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 9.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -187.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -192.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRNGEOPENOZ
Gross margin – 8.6% –
EBITDA margin – -14.8% –
Operating margin – -16.0% –
Pretax margin – -46.7% –
Net margin – -46.7% –
FCF margin – -14.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – -14.1% –
Return on equity – -162.9% –
Return on assets – -57.3% –
Return on invested capital – -20.2% –
Return on capital employed – -30.9% –
Asset turnover – 1.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 11.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRNGEOPENOZ
Debt / assets – 66.1% –
Debt / equity – 2.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.2x –
Debt / FCF – -4.1x –
Liabilities / assets – 69.1% –
Equity / assets – 30.9% –
Interest coverage – -4.6x –
Current ratio – 2.9x –
Quick ratio – 0.9x –
Cash ratio – 0.9x –
Altman Z-score – -0.71 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRNGEOPENOZ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -13.1% –
Shareholder yield – -13.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRNGEOPENOZ
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.61FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $3.69BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -15.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +102.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRNGEOPENOZ
Held by institutions – 57.7% 31.8%
Institutions holding – 393 45
Change in shares held, QoQ – +18.5% -6.0%
Institutions buying – 227 8
Institutions selling – 83 13
Buyers to sellers – 2.73 0.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RNGEOPENOZ
RNGE 1.00 0.15 -0.01
OPEN 0.15 1.00 0.02
OZ -0.01 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RNGE, OPEN and OZ?

Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Range Impact (RNGE) $57.71M, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) $1.85B, Belpointe PREP (OZ) $135.40M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Range Impact (RNGE) returned the most: Range Impact (RNGE) +194.1%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -75.8%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -44.0%. Over five years, Range Impact (RNGE) compounded fastest (Range Impact (RNGE) +16.8%/yr, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -39.6%/yr, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -18.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Belpointe PREP (OZ) has been the steadiest (Range Impact (RNGE) 131.4%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) 79.4%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RNGE, OPEN and OZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Range Impact (RNGE) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.