RNG vs NICE vs SANG Stock Comparison

RingCentral, Nice and Sangoma Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$86.35 +13.4% 1M +188.1% 1Y
Market cap
$7.29B
P/E
10.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
0.31%
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins
NICE NICE Ltd.
$122.41 +8.5% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$7.40B
P/E
8.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.91B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
6 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.65 +31.0% 1M -11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$155.03M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Nice leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Nice 6, Sangoma Technologies 3, RingCentral 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRNGNICESANGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.29B $7.40B $155.03M NICE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.9x 8.0x -2.0x NICE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.6x 11.2x — NICE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.5% +22.9% -14.2% NICE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.3% 16.2% -39.0% RNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.1% — 54.0% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.5x — 0.2x SANG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.31% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +188.1% -7.5% -11.3% RNG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.3%/yr -15.0%/yr -26.5%/yr NICE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.7% 55.3% 51.2% SANG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 59/100 40/100 NICE

Percentile Scorecard

RNGNICESANG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRNGNICESANG
Valuation 54 #7 of 14 100 #1 of 14 85 #3 of 14
Growth 64 #5 of 12 82 #3 of 12 0 #12 of 12
Profitability 80 #3 of 11 90 #2 of 11 50 #6 of 11
Financial Health 14 #13 of 15 21 #12 of 15 36 #10 of 15
Shareholder Returns 71 #3 of 8 0 #8 of 8 29 #6 of 8
Overall 57 59 40
  • RNG ranked among 16 companies in Workplace Software
  • NICE ranked among 16 companies in Workplace Software
  • SANG ranked among 16 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRNGNICESANGSPY
1 month +13.4%+8.5%+31.0% -0.8%
3 months +60.5%+28.8%+11.8% +3.5%
6 months +113.5%+21.2%+7.1% +7.0%
Year to date +199.0%+8.3%-8.3% +12.2%
1 year +188.1%-7.5%-11.3% +13.0%
3 years +241.3%-19.5%+63.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +50.6%-7.0%+17.7% +23.1%
5 years -63.6%-55.6%-78.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -18.3%-15.0%-26.5% +11.0%
10 years +300.7%+83.7%+121.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +14.9%+6.3%+8.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRNGNICESANGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.7%55.3%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.0%59.5%42.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.140.230.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.78-0.14-0.22 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -92.4%-73.6%-89.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-10.6%-13.9% -1.8%
52-week high $86.35$136.90$5.40 $779.14
52-week low $24.82$83.15$3.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRNGNICESANG
P/E now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 31.9x 8.0xmedian 31.9x -2.0xmedian 31.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 2.3x 1.3xmedian 2.3x 0.8xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 7.7x 4.6xmedian 7.7x 1.7xmedian 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 12.2x 6.9xmedian 12.2x 7.1xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median -588.8xmedian 1.7x —median 1.7x 0.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.20median 1.00 0.14median 1.00 0.05median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRNGNICESANG
Revenue $2.62B $5.91B $203.08M
Gross profit $1.89B $3.89B $143.68M
Operating income $196.64M $1.14B $66.76M
Net income $662.40M $955.10M -$81.09M
Free cash flow $667.24M $1.08B $21.92M
R&D $330.14M $745.97M $42.90M
EPS (diluted) $7.55 $15.08 $-2.38
Cash & equivalents $110.12M $315.38M $10.43M
Total debt $1.01B – $89.10M
Shares (diluted) 87.69M 63.32M 33.24M
Enterprise value $6.82B $5.86B $96.53M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRNGNICESANG
P/E 10.9x 8.0x -2.0x
P/FCF 10.9x 6.9x 7.1x
P/Operating cash flow 10.4x 5.4x 6.5x
P/S 2.8x 1.3x 0.8x
P/B -588.8x – 0.9x
P/Tangible book -129.3x – 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.1x 4.6x 1.7x
EV/EBIT 41.7x 6.2x 2.6x
EV/Revenue 3.1x 1.2x 0.8x
EV/FCF 12.3x 6.5x 7.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x 5.2x 7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.20 0.14 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRNGNICESANG
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.5% 22.9% -14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 50.0% -7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.0% 21.5% -11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 48.5% -6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 109.8% 16.2% -18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 55.1% -18.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 4,905% 5.6% -1,519%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 53.9% 56.6% -40.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 5,149% 9.2% -1,493%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 55.7% 59.1% -39.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.3% -1.4% -43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.1% 59.1% -9.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.5% -16.3% -50.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 38.2% -8.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRNGNICESANG
Gross margin 72.2% 65.8% 70.7%
EBITDA margin 22.2% 26.2% 50.3%
Operating margin 7.5% 19.2% 32.9%
Pretax margin 5.0% 21.3% -41.7%
Net margin 25.3% 16.2% -39.0%
FCF margin 25.5% 18.3% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 26.7% 23.1% 11.7%
Return on equity – – -87.1%
Return on assets 40.7% 18.9% –
Return on invested capital 26.1% – 54.0%
Return on capital employed 20.7% 28.8% –
Asset turnover 1.6x 1.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.4x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 9.2% 5.4% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRNGNICESANG
Debt / assets 53.9% – 11.6%
Debt / equity -81.6x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.5x – 0.2x
Debt / FCF 1.5x – 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 100.7% – 25.8%
Equity / assets -0.7% – 74.2%
Interest coverage 3.1x – 33.0x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.1x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.27 – 1.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRNGNICESANG
Dividend yield 0.3% – –
Net buyback yield 4.4% -18.8% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 4.7% -18.8% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRNGNICESANG
Forward P/E 16.6xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.20FY2026 $10.91FY2026 $-0.17FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +19.3%FY2026 -11.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +3.3% +19.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.75BFY2026 $3.32BFY2026 $192.47MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +9.3%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -4.3% -2.0% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRNGNICESANG
Held by institutions 100.0% 56.3% –
Institutions holding 379 320 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% +7.0% –
Institutions buying 212 145 –
Institutions selling 121 131 –
Buyers to sellers 1.75 1.11 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RNGNICESANG
RNG 1.00 0.54 0.03
NICE 0.54 1.00 0.03
SANG 0.03 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RNG, NICE and SANG?

Nice (NICE) is the largest by market capitalisation: RingCentral (RNG) $7.29B, Nice (NICE) $7.40B, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $155.03M.

Which stock is cheaper, RNG, NICE and SANG?

Nice (NICE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (RingCentral (RNG) 10.9x, Nice (NICE) 8.0x, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -2.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nice (NICE) is cheapest (RingCentral (RNG) 16.6x, Nice (NICE) 11.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nice (NICE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%, Nice (NICE) +22.9%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

RingCentral (RNG) has the highest net margin (RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%, Nice (NICE) 16.2%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RingCentral (RNG) returned the most: RingCentral (RNG) +188.1%, Nice (NICE) -7.5%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -11.3%. Over five years, Nice (NICE) compounded fastest (RingCentral (RNG) -18.3%/yr, Nice (NICE) -15.0%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: RingCentral (RNG) 0.31%, Nice (NICE) 0.00%. Nice (NICE) and Sangoma Technologies (SANG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) has been the steadiest (RingCentral (RNG) 67.7%, Nice (NICE) 55.3%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RNG, NICE and SANG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nice (NICE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.